Staging Disability: Shakespeare’s Richard Ⅲ across Stage, Screen, and Digital Afterlives
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This essay examines shifting representations of Shakespeare’s Richard Ⅲ across stage, screen, and in dialogue with the recent AI-assisted voice reconstruction of the historical king, to trace evolving notions of disability in representation. Shakespeare’s text foregrounds Richard’s corporeality as both a mark of villainy and a source of theatrical power, a view reinforced by early commentators such as Thomas More and Francis Bacon, who connected bodily irregularity to moral corruption. This tradition casts Richard as a monstrous figure whose physical difference anchored his social alienation. Recent disability studies, however, challenge such static readings by emphasizing the mutability of disability as a cultural category. Scholars including Rosemarie Garland-Thomson, David Mitchell and Sharon Snyder show how physical difference functions not as a fixed emblem of vice but as a shifting cultural sign, reinterpreted through changing ideological frameworks. Building on this, the essay reconsiders how Richard’s body has been staged and theorized across periods, and demonstrates that his extraordinary body consistently reflects cultural anxieties about embodiment and power. That mutability persists into the present, as the 2024 digital voice reconstruction reimagines Richard’s embodiment sonically, which shows how audibility reconfigures identity and disability across media.
Abstract
This essay examines shifting representations of Shakespeare’s Richard Ⅲ across stage, screen, and in dialogue with the recent AI-assisted voice reconstruction of the historical king, to trace evolving notions of disability in representation. Shakespeare’s text foregrounds Richard’s corporeality as both a mark of villainy and a source of theatrical power, a view reinforced by early commentators such as Thomas More and Francis Bacon, who connected bodily irregularity to moral corruption. This tradition casts Richard as a monstrous figure whose physical difference anchored his social alienation. Recent disability studies, however, challenge such static readings by emphasizing the mutability of disability as a cultural category. Scholars including Rosemarie Garland-Thomson, David Mitchell and Sharon Snyder show how physical difference functions not as a fixed emblem of vice but as a shifting cultural sign, reinterpreted through changing ideological frameworks. Building on this, the essay reconsiders how Richard’s body has been staged and theorized across periods, and demonstrates that his extraordinary body consistently reflects cultural anxieties about embodiment and power. That mutability persists into the present, as the 2024 digital voice reconstruction reimagines Richard’s embodiment sonically, which shows how audibility reconfigures identity and disability across media.