김춘수 시에 있어서의‘천사’의 시적 변용
The Poetic Acculturation of‘ Angel’ in Kim-Chunsu’s Poems
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Being a modernist as well as a specific stylist in korean world of poetry, Kim-Chunsu made angels ‘epistemological topic’by introducing‘ angels’in his poetic activities constantly and repeatedly for over 60 years . The first angel was ‘the angel of creation’, ‘the angel of transfiguration’as ‘the angel of childhood’that brings on changes to all things under the sun. The poet takes note of ‘the space of eternal silence’which the angel owns. This means it contains the dark fear of the Only Self in front of(facing) the world. It tells the epistemological ground of his early poetic world. The second angel of the poet accepts pantheistic angel of Rilke. It is not the symbol of the Christian, the one and only God, but the angel of the whole of creation scattered in all nature. It is a pantheistic angel of Rilke. but there is another aspect in the angel of Kim-Chunsu.:Namely, the angel of Rilke is the narcissistic being which is disconnected with a human being, on the other hand, the angel of Kim-Chunsu is the angel of mutual helping being who makes a little heart revive behind the back of the dead boy. Besides, there are ‘flames of world’and ‘a dead boy’and ‘night of darkness in the background of the angel Kim Chun-su had introduced. Therefore, Kim Chun-su had brought on an angel to grasp the limit and the tragedy of human being’s life through the relationship with the heavenly(eternal) existence. The third angel of the poet is‘ an angel whose whole body is made of eye’said by theologist Cestoff in Russian Orthodox Church. Therefore, the ‘angel’is a device to show the pain of the world, and transcendency of the heaven when it watches the death of Jesus. The poet also called Sonja ‘an angel’in the novel, 『Crime and Punishment 』of Dostoevsky to investigate the tragedy of human body and the transcendency surpassing the limit of human body. And the poet says the angel’s eye is still watching Raskolinikov. This is an allegory to reveal ontological uneasiness. for the subject standing in front of the world. The last angel as‘ the angel of everyday lives’became harmonious with all the past angels. Sometimes it appears with the shape of ‘the eye of the mirror’, it sometimes awakens him with the verse:“ there is the word,‘ Dear!’for me, instead of the word,‘ an angel.”(『two still objects』)An ideological(abstract) topic becomes harmonious in daily life. The angel covered with ideological skin leaves the cocoon and instead the voice of the subject is filled in the place. ‘The angel of everyday lives’speaks for his last criticism of poems. : Feeling is the truth.
Abstract
Being a modernist as well as a specific stylist in korean world of poetry, Kim-Chunsu made angels ‘epistemological topic’by introducing‘ angels’in his poetic activities constantly and repeatedly for over 60 years . The first angel was ‘the angel of creation’, ‘the angel of transfiguration’as ‘the angel of childhood’that brings on changes to all things under the sun. The poet takes note of ‘the space of eternal silence’which the angel owns. This means it contains the dark fear of the Only Self in front of(facing) the world. It tells the epistemological ground of his early poetic world. The second angel of the poet accepts pantheistic angel of Rilke. It is not the symbol of the Christian, the one and only God, but the angel of the whole of creation scattered in all nature. It is a pantheistic angel of Rilke. but there is another aspect in the angel of Kim-Chunsu.:Namely, the angel of Rilke is the narcissistic being which is disconnected with a human being, on the other hand, the angel of Kim-Chunsu is the angel of mutual helping being who makes a little heart revive behind the back of the dead boy. Besides, there are ‘flames of world’and ‘a dead boy’and ‘night of darkness in the background of the angel Kim Chun-su had introduced. Therefore, Kim Chun-su had brought on an angel to grasp the limit and the tragedy of human being’s life through the relationship with the heavenly(eternal) existence. The third angel of the poet is‘ an angel whose whole body is made of eye’said by theologist Cestoff in Russian Orthodox Church. Therefore, the ‘angel’is a device to show the pain of the world, and transcendency of the heaven when it watches the death of Jesus. The poet also called Sonja ‘an angel’in the novel, 『Crime and Punishment 』of Dostoevsky to investigate the tragedy of human body and the transcendency surpassing the limit of human body. And the poet says the angel’s eye is still watching Raskolinikov. This is an allegory to reveal ontological uneasiness. for the subject standing in front of the world. The last angel as‘ the angel of everyday lives’became harmonious with all the past angels. Sometimes it appears with the shape of ‘the eye of the mirror’, it sometimes awakens him with the verse:“ there is the word,‘ Dear!’for me, instead of the word,‘ an angel.”(『two still objects』)An ideological(abstract) topic becomes harmonious in daily life. The angel covered with ideological skin leaves the cocoon and instead the voice of the subject is filled in the place. ‘The angel of everyday lives’speaks for his last criticism of poems. : Feeling is the truth.
참고문헌 (26)
- 김춘수, "꽃과여우" (1977), 민음사
- 김춘수, "김춘수전집2" (1986), 문장사
- 김춘수, "김춘수 시 전집" (1994), 민음사
- 김춘수, "들림, 도스토예프스키" (1997), 민음사
- 김춘수, "의자와 계단" (1999), 문학세계사
- 김춘수, "거울속의 천사" (2001), 민음사
- 김춘수, "쉰한편의 悲歌" (2002), 현대문학
- 라이너 마리아 릴케, "릴케 전집 2" (2000), 책세상
- "공동번역 성서(가톨릭용)" (1999), 대한성서공회
- 김승희, "김춘수시새로읽기: Abjection, 이미지, 상호텍스트성, 파쇄된주체. in: 코라기호학과 한국시 : 탈구조주의로 한국시 읽기" (2008), 서강대 출판부
- 김용하, "언어의 위기 극복과 미적 윤리성의 발견김춘수와 릴케의 시어 ‘꽃’과 ‘천사’를 중심으로", 어문학, 82, pp.101~121 (2003), 한국어문학회
- 김자성, "릴케의‘두이노의 비가’에 나타난 천사의 본질", 헤세연구, 9 (2003), 한국헤세학회
- 김현자, "김춘수 시의 구조와 청자의 반응. in: 한국시의 감각과 미적 거리" (1997), 문학과지성사
- 김춘수, "접붙이기. in: 한국현대표시론" (2006), 태학사
- 류신, "천사의 변용, 변용의 천사 - 김춘수와 릴케", 비교문학, 36(36), pp.219~240 (2005), 한국비교문학회
- 송효섭, "설화의 기호학" (1999), 민음사
- 오세영, "김춘수의 무의미시", 한국현대문학연구, (15), pp.326~385 (2004), 한국현대문학회
- 오정국, "김춘수 시의 인물 연구. in: 비극적 서사의 서정적 풍경" (2004), 청동거울
- 이승훈, "김춘수, 시선과 응시의 매혹- ‘꽃과 여우’를 중심으로", 작가세계, 통권 : 33 (1997)
- 이재선, "한국문학주제론" (1997), 서강대출판부
- 임동확, "김춘수 무의미 시론과‘처용’과‘천사’의 변주", 시학과 언어학, 13 (2004), 시학과 언어학회
- 조영복, "여우, 장미를 찾아가다-김춘수의 문학적 연대기", 작가세계, 통권 : 33 (1997)
- 니콜라이 베르자예프, "도스토예프스키-신과 인간의 비극" (1982), 문학세계사
- 롤랑 바르트, "정면으로 응시하고. in: 이미지와 글쓰기" (1993), 세계사
- C. Sander, "소쉬르의 일반 언어학 강의" (1996), 어문학사
- Yuri M, Lotman, "University of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture, Ann Shukman" (1990), Indiana University Press
