본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

북한의 문예창작 방법론 연구 - ‘ 종자이론’의 형성과 발전

A Study on the Methodology of Creative Writing in North Korea - Formation and Development of ‘Jongja Theory’

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류문학

초록

Jongja theory is the one that applies the literature theory of North Korea’s Juche Idea to the methodology of creative writing. In the literary circles in North Korea, Jongja theory is defined as the theory of Kim Jeong-Il, and as “the phenomenal event in literature history that has brought about a huge revolution in the development of literature theories and creative writing in literary works.”This thesis critically examined the core of Jongja Theory which has been discussed in North Korean literature. Jongja is defined in North Korean literary circles as follows.“ Jongja is the core of literary works and ideological kernel of living with the basis on which the writer’s basic issues and factors for figuration take root.”This researcher understood that such definition of the concept is mere enumeration of each element that is known as the structural element of literature rather than creative discovery defining the principles of creative writing. In other word, Jongja is just listing the material, theme, and ideology in one sentence. Jongja is regarded as “the core of literary works”, and the content of the core is defined as “the basic issue that the writer intends to tell”(i.e. theme) and “the basis on which factors for figuration take root”(material), and “the ideological kernel of living”(ideology) that is combined with the forms of literary works and is differentiated from ideology. This can be criticized that it is like‘ putting a fifth wheel on a coach’through the concept of “Jongja.”It can be said that creation of new language based on Juche Idea or desire for order of Juche Idea is reflected on this. This thesis examined the process in which Jongja theory was formed in the 1970s and has been settled as essential thesis of creative writing. It can be said that this is the process to trace the history of concepts. I traced how‘ the view of the leader’led by Kim Jeong-Il is reflected on Jongja theory in the course of canonizing ‘Jongja theory.’I have also revealed that a kind of biological language or agriculture centrism language has been reflected on Jongja theory, and the production of concepts in the manner of emphasizing materials,themes, and ideology has been intended. What draws our interest is that, despite the fact that establishing the theoretical issue in North Korean literature is consistent with epic literature, it is quoted far more in the lyric genre in actual application and commentary of literary works. Together with this, what can be examined critically is what kind of system of thought is placed in the ground of attitude of trying to regard literary works as an organic system. It is emphasized that Jongja is a ‘nucleus’and is a kind of latent form or possible form. The nucleus is combined with various factors (materials, themes, and ideology) and forms the characteristics of figuration. The core of such agricultural way of thinking is represented vividly in Kim Jeong-Woong’s expression that“ Jongja is what makes flowers bloom.”The thought that Jongja grows to be ‘a great literary work’is considerably botanical and hierarchical. In other words, the absolute value is given to the position of‘ Jongja’by defining that one literary work can have only one seed. This ultimately is consistent with the symbol imagined by the North Korean social system. It emphasizes the hierarchy of North Korean society by stressing the “prototype of artistic figuration”of literary works. In the core of the hierarchy,“ the leader”as the symbolic prototype of North Korean society is situated,and it can be understood that ‘Jongja theory’as the metaphorical system has been systematized by Kim Jeong-II.

Abstract

Jongja theory is the one that applies the literature theory of North Korea’s Juche Idea to the methodology of creative writing. In the literary circles in North Korea, Jongja theory is defined as the theory of Kim Jeong-Il, and as “the phenomenal event in literature history that has brought about a huge revolution in the development of literature theories and creative writing in literary works.”This thesis critically examined the core of Jongja Theory which has been discussed in North Korean literature. Jongja is defined in North Korean literary circles as follows.“ Jongja is the core of literary works and ideological kernel of living with the basis on which the writer’s basic issues and factors for figuration take root.”This researcher understood that such definition of the concept is mere enumeration of each element that is known as the structural element of literature rather than creative discovery defining the principles of creative writing. In other word, Jongja is just listing the material, theme, and ideology in one sentence. Jongja is regarded as “the core of literary works”, and the content of the core is defined as “the basic issue that the writer intends to tell”(i.e. theme) and “the basis on which factors for figuration take root”(material), and “the ideological kernel of living”(ideology) that is combined with the forms of literary works and is differentiated from ideology. This can be criticized that it is like‘ putting a fifth wheel on a coach’through the concept of “Jongja.”It can be said that creation of new language based on Juche Idea or desire for order of Juche Idea is reflected on this. This thesis examined the process in which Jongja theory was formed in the 1970s and has been settled as essential thesis of creative writing. It can be said that this is the process to trace the history of concepts. I traced how‘ the view of the leader’led by Kim Jeong-Il is reflected on Jongja theory in the course of canonizing ‘Jongja theory.’I have also revealed that a kind of biological language or agriculture centrism language has been reflected on Jongja theory, and the production of concepts in the manner of emphasizing materials,themes, and ideology has been intended. What draws our interest is that, despite the fact that establishing the theoretical issue in North Korean literature is consistent with epic literature, it is quoted far more in the lyric genre in actual application and commentary of literary works. Together with this, what can be examined critically is what kind of system of thought is placed in the ground of attitude of trying to regard literary works as an organic system. It is emphasized that Jongja is a ‘nucleus’and is a kind of latent form or possible form. The nucleus is combined with various factors (materials, themes, and ideology) and forms the characteristics of figuration. The core of such agricultural way of thinking is represented vividly in Kim Jeong-Woong’s expression that“ Jongja is what makes flowers bloom.”The thought that Jongja grows to be ‘a great literary work’is considerably botanical and hierarchical. In other words, the absolute value is given to the position of‘ Jongja’by defining that one literary work can have only one seed. This ultimately is consistent with the symbol imagined by the North Korean social system. It emphasizes the hierarchy of North Korean society by stressing the “prototype of artistic figuration”of literary works. In the core of the hierarchy,“ the leader”as the symbolic prototype of North Korean society is situated,and it can be understood that ‘Jongja theory’as the metaphorical system has been systematized by Kim Jeong-II.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. 김송인, "종자를 똑바로 쥘 때", 조선문학 (1973), 문예출판사
  2. 김응하, "종자를 구체적인 생활에서 찾자", 조선문학 (1974), 문예출판사
  3. 김정웅, "문학예술작품의 종자. in: 위대한 령도자 김정일동지의 사상리론 문예학 4" (1998), 사회과학출판사
  4. 김정웅, "종자와 작품 창작의 원리", 조선어문, (1) (2001), 과학백과사전종합출판사
  5. 김하명, "창작에서 종자를 똑바로 잡을데 대한 리론의 독창성", 조선문학 (1973), 문예출판사
  6. 리근지, "칠보산 기행시초 벽계수는 흘러가는데", 조선문학 (2006), 문학예술출판사
  7. 리동수, "생활이 비낀 시적인 종자의 탐구", 조선문학 (2007), 문학예술출판사
  8. 리일복, "생활의 깊이와 시의 깊이", 조선문학 (1972), 문예출판사
  9. 박연경, "창작에서 종자문제와 독창성의 탐구 - 《조선문학》에 발표된 벽시들을 읽고-", 조선문학 (1973), 문예출판사
  10. 박춘택, "종자탐구의 고전적 본보기", 조선문학 (2008), 문학예술출판사
  11. 사회과학원 주체문학연구소, "종자. in: 문학예술사전(중)" (1991), 과학백과사전종합출판사
  12. 사회과학원, "종자. in: 문학대사전 3" (2000), 사회과학원출판사
  13. 엄영일, "문학예술에서의 철학적 깊이. in; 위대한 령도자 김정일동지의 사상리론" (1996), 사회과학출판사
  14. "올해 혁명적 문학예술창작에서 새로운 앙양을 일으키자", 조선예술 (1973), 문예출판사
  15. "위대한 수령 김일성동지의 주체적문예사상을 받들고 혁명적 작품창작에서 새로운 앙양을일으키자!(머리글)", 조선문학 (1973), 문예출판사
  16. "조선중앙년감(1974년)" (1974), 조선중앙통신사
  17. "주체적인 문학예술의 새로운 앙양을 위하여", 조선예술 (1973), 문예출판사
  18. 최학수, "수령님의 주체적 문예사상을 더 깊이 체득하는 과정이였다 - 장편소설《그들은 함께싸웠다》를합작하고", 조선문학 (1972), 문예출판사
  19. 최학수, "창작에서 종자를 개성적으로 골라잡기 위하여", 조선문학 (1974), 문예출판사
  20. 하경호, "종자문제와 미술가의 탐구정신", 조선문학 (1973), 문예출판사
  21. 한중모, "친애하는 지도자 김정일동지의 불후의 고전적로작《주체문학론》은 새 시대 문학건설과 창조의 강령적 지침", 조선어문, (1) (1993), 과학백과사전종합출판사
  22. 현종호, "문학예술작품의 종자에 관한 주체적 문예리론. in: 문예론문집 1" (1976), 사회과학출판사
  23. 김용범, "종자중시사상으로 부활한 북한 문예이론 종자론의 실체에 대한 연구", 동아시아문화연구, (44), pp.201~226 (2008), 동아시아문화연구소
  24. 김정웅, "종자와그형상" (1988), 문예출판사
  25. 김정웅, "종자와작품창작" (1987), 사회과학출판사
  26. 김정일, "김정일 선집 1" (1992), 조선로동당출판사
  27. 김정일, "김정일 선집 3" (1994), 조선로동당출판사
  28. 김정일, "영화예술론" (1984), 조선로동당출판사
  29. 김정일, "주체문학론" (1992), 조선로동당출판사
  30. 김하명, "문학 예술작품의 종자에 관한 리론" (1977), 사회과학출판사
  31. 박승덕, "위대한 주체사상 총서8 : 사회주의 문화건설 이론" (1985), 사회과학출판사
  32. 서재경, "주체의 문학창작" (2007), 문학예술출판사
  33. 손종업, "종자이론과 북한 문예이론의 특징", 어문논집, 35 (2006), 제35집,중앙어문학회
  34. 오태호, "최학수의 장편소설에 나타난 수령 형상의 의미 고찰", 상허학보, 24, pp.49~63 (2008), 상허학회
  35. 이종석, "새로 쓴 현대 북한의 이해" (2000), 역사비평사
  36. 전영선, "문화예술 창작 토대로서 종자론. in: 북한 예술의 창작지형과 21세기 트렌드" (2009), 역락
  37. 한중모, "주체의 문예리론 연구" (1983), 사회과학출판사
  38. 레이몬드 윌리엄즈, "이념과 문학" (1982), 문학과지성사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)