정호승 시를 통해 본 서정의 탈영토성과 윤리적 주체의 의미

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyze the structure of the lyricism and the ethics in Jung Ho-sueng’s poems. There is an interaction between the description of feeling of a sorrow and the awareness of the ethics which is conspicuous characteristics of his poems. This fact would throws a light on writing a lylic poem. His poems are based on the consciousness of the Others and the poetic subject and lay the cornerstone of a building on the poetic ethics. The poetic subject is closely connected with the Others. It is surely to be a subject with the Others. In most cases the Others would be people in grief because of their poverty in his poetry. If the poetic subject don’t have this kind of consciousness, the subject will be fallen onto the one being shut in the narcissism. Expressly, The city of ‘Seoul’the poetic space of him is symbolized by this meaning about the relation of the subject and the Other. There is a territory of the lyricism. The lyricism is not territorialized. We can call this deterritorialization of the lyricism. How does this poet, Jung Ho-sueng, express the emotion? As like sadnesses or pleasures of life? How does he renew the feeling and how does he make that feeling into the poetic things? A sadness is not meant to itself in his poetry. His poems have the recognition of the sadness. This means that the sadness is not to loose the wholeness. This is the point what I want to analyze with the authority of “The Ethics”of Spinoza. The ethics in Jung Ho-sueng’s poems is different from the moral dichotomy like good and evil. He refuses the moral dichotomy but he wants to represent the life plentiful. Because of that reason, he regards the lyricism in the same as the ethics.