본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

고은 시의 미적 근대성 구현 양상 -1990년대 시를 중심으로

Ko Un's Poetry and Poetic Practise of Aesthetic Modernity - focused on 1990s Poetry

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류문학

초록

The esthetic modernity brings with it a renewed understanding of the value of the artistic practice in an age that believes the social modernity as the holistic value. The concept of the esthetic modernity is very important in describing the disparity between social life and artistic practice, and the uniqueness of the artistic principles. While it is the critical attribute of art that desires to understand its own age, it also refers to the artistic epistemology as otherness. The temporality of art amounts to anti-temporality, for the esthetic quality that art presents to the social modernity positions itself as the mirror of life. The esthetic modernity ensures the continuity in the esthetic practice, while it builds the temporal validity and artistic esthetics on the integral perspective. For Ko Un who aggressively wants to put the social issues in his poetry, the esthetic modernity is significant as a new way of reading his poetry. For it is understood that such a perspective has contributed to the correction and resolution of the problems with the existing discussions that treat his poetry in a discontinued manner, splitting it into before and after 'the period of struggle'. The arguments that Ko Un's poetic development, moving through the postwar nihilism and the anti-dictatorship struggle, turns into estheticism with the 1990s separate the role of an educative intellectual and the poet and furthermore constitutes a fiction that derives from the dichotomy of theory and practice, belles lettres and engagement. The poet's poetic practice, when he becomes aware of the life of modern life, unfurls the horizon of the esthetic modernity, while in the democratic struggle in the 1980s he already reaches the 'poetic understanding of modernity' and coming into the 1990s, he attempted the internalization of modernity as his esthetic decision. With The Star of Father Country (1984) that is adjudged to establish a turning point from the inner freedom and his life as a free-spirited modernist to his aggressive understanding of the social questions, and with his poetry of the 1990s that is dominated by repentance, remorses, and discourses of recollection and reflection, Ko Un delimits the horizon of esthetic modernity as against the disruptive process of modernization. That is why Far-off Road (1999) is considered the most explicit esthetic decision that represents Ko Unof the 1990s.

Abstract

The esthetic modernity brings with it a renewed understanding of the value of the artistic practice in an age that believes the social modernity as the holistic value. The concept of the esthetic modernity is very important in describing the disparity between social life and artistic practice, and the uniqueness of the artistic principles. While it is the critical attribute of art that desires to understand its own age, it also refers to the artistic epistemology as otherness. The temporality of art amounts to anti-temporality, for the esthetic quality that art presents to the social modernity positions itself as the mirror of life. The esthetic modernity ensures the continuity in the esthetic practice, while it builds the temporal validity and artistic esthetics on the integral perspective. For Ko Un who aggressively wants to put the social issues in his poetry, the esthetic modernity is significant as a new way of reading his poetry. For it is understood that such a perspective has contributed to the correction and resolution of the problems with the existing discussions that treat his poetry in a discontinued manner, splitting it into before and after 'the period of struggle'. The arguments that Ko Un's poetic development, moving through the postwar nihilism and the anti-dictatorship struggle, turns into estheticism with the 1990s separate the role of an educative intellectual and the poet and furthermore constitutes a fiction that derives from the dichotomy of theory and practice, belles lettres and engagement. The poet's poetic practice, when he becomes aware of the life of modern life, unfurls the horizon of the esthetic modernity, while in the democratic struggle in the 1980s he already reaches the 'poetic understanding of modernity' and coming into the 1990s, he attempted the internalization of modernity as his esthetic decision. With The Star of Father Country (1984) that is adjudged to establish a turning point from the inner freedom and his life as a free-spirited modernist to his aggressive understanding of the social questions, and with his poetry of the 1990s that is dominated by repentance, remorses, and discourses of recollection and reflection, Ko Un delimits the horizon of esthetic modernity as against the disruptive process of modernization. That is why Far-off Road (1999) is considered the most explicit esthetic decision that represents Ko Unof the 1990s.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. 고은, "조국의 별" (1984), 창작과비평사
  2. 고은, "아침이슬" (1990), 동아
  3. 고은, "해금강" (1991), 한길사
  4. 고은, "거리의 노래" (1991), 한국문학사
  5. 고은, "뭐냐" (1991), 청하
  6. 고은, "내일의 노래" (1992), 창작과비평사
  7. 고은, "아직 가지 않은 길" (1993), 현대문학사
  8. 고은, "독도" (1995), 창작과비평사
  9. 고은, "어느 기념비" (1997), 민음사
  10. 고은, "속삭임" (1998), 실천문학사
  11. 고은, "머나먼 길" (1999), 문학사상사
  12. 김태성, "근대와 나의 문학", pp.19~ (2008), 민음사
  13. 고은, "문학앨범", pp.282~ (1993), 웅진출판
  14. 고은, "우주의 사투리", pp.164~ (2007), 민음사
  15. 고은, "나의 삶, 나의 시 - 백년이 담긴 오십 년", pp.69~70 (2010), 서울대학교
  16. 고은, "나는 격류였다", pp.16~ (2010), 서울대출판부
  17. 김영찬, "근대의 불안과 모더니즘", pp.13~ (2006), 소명출판사
  18. 김윤식, "한국근대문예비평사연구", pp.49~56 (1987), 일지사
  19. 김춘식, "한국 신문학 초창기 문학장(文學場)의 형성과 서구적 개념의 미적 근대성 비교", 동서비교문학저널, (12), pp.171~195 (2005), 한국동서비교문학학회
  20. 신경림, "고은 문학의 세계", pp.25~ (1993), 창작과비평사
  21. 이광호, "미적 근대성과 한국문학사", pp.24~ (2001), 민음사
  22. 장은영, "고은의 『만인보』 연구 : 역사의 형상화와 정체성 문제를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2011
  23. 하정일, "20세기 한국문학과 근대성의 변증법", pp.171~ (2000), 소명출판사
  24. 한원균, "비평의 거울" (2001), 청동거울
  25. 한원균, "고은시의 미학" (2001), 한길사
  26. 한원균, "비판과 성찰의 글쓰기", pp.16~ (2005), 청동거울
  27. 한원균, "고은이라는 타자" (2011), 청동거울
  28. 한원균, "문학의 정치, ‘광주민주화운동’의 시적 재현-고은의 『만인보』(27-30)를 중심으로", 한국문예창작, 10(3), pp.7~38 (2011), 한국문예창작학회
  29. Habermas. J, "현대성의 철학적 담론", pp.66~ (1994), 문예출판사
  30. Habermas. J, "이론과 실천", pp.43~ (1982), 종로서적
  31. Marx.K, "공산당선언", pp.89~ (1989), 백산서당
  32. Touraine. A, "현대성 비판", pp.137~139 (1995), 문예출판사
  33. 이마무라 히토시, "근대성의 구조", pp.39~ (1999), 민음사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)