애니메이션「마당을 나온 암탉」과 만화『마당을 나온 암탉』의 비교 연구
The Comparative Study of Animation of Leafie, a Hen into the Wild and Cartoon of Leafie, a Hen into the Wild
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This writing compares and analyzes popular narrative strategies of OhSeong-yoon direcotr’s animation‘ Leafie, a Hen into the Wild’and inwhich creative ways the popular narrative strategies were designed whenthe work was reconstructed from a movie into a cartoon. This paperintends to put forth basic views for the researchers or professionals’reference who plan to reconstruct storytelling in a creative way in thefuture based on this. The animation opened in 2011 was targeted for general audiences forall families by resuming the format of family drama combining thecoming-of-age stories of ‘Leafie’and‘ Green’. The animation has morecomplex layers of structure than the children’s story. The animationadjusted the personalities of characters for more creative adaptation ofthe story and added supporting characters that did not exist in theoriginal material. The place of adventure changed from ‘reservoir’to‘Upo swamp’to deliver lively images of nature effectively highlightingthe adventurous characters of Leafie and Green. The cartoon consisting of the total of three books is a transition from a moving picture to printed medium creating differences in the method ofexpression. Each book has its own distinct character where the first bookmixes the adventurous narrative and drama when Leafie steps into thewild and watches the birth of a duck. The second book focuses on thegrowth of Green rather than Leafie’s life displaying various events tocreate a harmony of growth, adventure, dueling, and comic relief. Thethird book is about Green becoming a guard with a heroic narrative andcontains dynamic scenes to illustrate this. As such, each central story from the cartoon was designed for classes ofreaders who are seeking various kinds of entertainment employingdiversified strategies to convey a narrative. However, the carton’sstrategy of focusing on characteristics of each book resulted in theconsiderable restriction of philosophical themes such as circular naturalview and respect for life that were found in the original story andanimation.
Abstract
This writing compares and analyzes popular narrative strategies of OhSeong-yoon direcotr’s animation‘ Leafie, a Hen into the Wild’and inwhich creative ways the popular narrative strategies were designed whenthe work was reconstructed from a movie into a cartoon. This paperintends to put forth basic views for the researchers or professionals’reference who plan to reconstruct storytelling in a creative way in thefuture based on this. The animation opened in 2011 was targeted for general audiences forall families by resuming the format of family drama combining thecoming-of-age stories of ‘Leafie’and‘ Green’. The animation has morecomplex layers of structure than the children’s story. The animationadjusted the personalities of characters for more creative adaptation ofthe story and added supporting characters that did not exist in theoriginal material. The place of adventure changed from ‘reservoir’to‘Upo swamp’to deliver lively images of nature effectively highlightingthe adventurous characters of Leafie and Green. The cartoon consisting of the total of three books is a transition from a moving picture to printed medium creating differences in the method ofexpression. Each book has its own distinct character where the first bookmixes the adventurous narrative and drama when Leafie steps into thewild and watches the birth of a duck. The second book focuses on thegrowth of Green rather than Leafie’s life displaying various events tocreate a harmony of growth, adventure, dueling, and comic relief. Thethird book is about Green becoming a guard with a heroic narrative andcontains dynamic scenes to illustrate this. As such, each central story from the cartoon was designed for classes ofreaders who are seeking various kinds of entertainment employingdiversified strategies to convey a narrative. However, the carton’sstrategy of focusing on characteristics of each book resulted in theconsiderable restriction of philosophical themes such as circular naturalview and respect for life that were found in the original story andanimation.
참고문헌 (20)
- 오성윤, "애니메이션〈마당을 나온 암탉〉" (2011), 명필름
- 황선미, "마당을나온암탉" (2000), 사계절
- 황선미, "애니코믹스『마당을 나온 암탉』" (2011), 사계절
- 김은주, "한국 애니매이션 “마당을 나온 암탉”에서 찾은 생태적 인식 및 유아교육적 의미 탐색", 어린이문학교육연구, 12(2), pp.183~199 (2011), 한국어린이문학교육학회
- 김윤아, "한국 극장용 장편 애니메이션 산업의 발전 방향에 대한 연구 : <마당을 나온 암탉>을 중심으로", 만화애니메이션연구, (26), pp.109~129 (2012), 한국만화애니메이션학회
- 류수열, "스토리텔링의이해" (2007), 글누림
- 방지은, "인쇄만화와 드라마의 매체 특성 비교 연구 : 만화 <궁>과 드라마 <궁>의 재매개 특성을 중심으로", 석사, 영상문화학, pp.2007
- 박세영, "<마당을 나온 암탉> 흥행요인 분석", 애니메이션연구, 7(4), pp.106~119 (2011), 한국애니메이션학회
- 박혜숙, "마당을 나온 암탉과 강아지똥의 초월성", 동화와 번역, (24), pp.219~238 (2012), 동화와번역연구소
- 배주영, "디지털애니메이션스토리텔링" (2006), 살림
- 이영헌, "장편애니메이션에서 프로타고니스트와 안타고니스트를 중심으로 하는 내러티브의 기호학적 분석 : <마당을 나온 암탉>을 중심으로", 만화애니메이션연구, (33), pp.79~97 (2013), 한국만화애니메이션학회
- 신수진, "행복을기다리며", 창비어린이, 9(3), pp.204~211 (2011), 창비
- 이종호, "동화와 각색 애니메이션의 서사학적 비교 연구—<마당을 나온 암탉>을 중심으로", 국제어문, (56), pp.35~96 (2012), 국제어문학회
- 이주영, "다름의벽을뛰어넘어함께살기:다름의벽을뛰어넘는세가지길", 진보평론, 7, pp.403~ (2001), 메이데이
- 이중목, "애니메이션의 통과의례 서사 연구 : <마당을 나온 암탉>과 <쿵푸팬더>의 구조분석을 중심으로", 석사, 디지털애니메이션전공, pp.2012
- 조영준, "명필름, 팝콘크레이티브,‘ 마당을 나온 암탉’콘텐츠 사업 추진한다", 동아일보, ~ (2013)
- 요모타이누히코, "만화원론" (2000), 시공사
- McCloud, Scott, "만화의이해" (2002), 시공사
- "톰컬리인터뷰", 연합뉴스, ~ (2007)
