『삼국유사』 고구려 관련 기사의 성격에 대한 일고찰
Regarding Goguryeo in Samkukyusa
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study is an analysis on the chapters about Goguryeo in Samgukyusa. The result of the analysis is as following. First, Samgukyusa is assumed to have a number of authors other than Ilyeon himself. It is proved by a fact that none of the articles regarding Goguryeo cites the authority in book 5, apparently written by Ilyeon, while only two articles are found in book 4, signed by Mugeuk. Difference in the verification of the reference can be an evidence for the possible existence of other authors of Samgukyusa. Second, Samgukyusa can be considered a report on the history of Goguryeo as much as the history of Shilla. According to this study, 41.8-44.9% of Samgukyusa is about Goguryeo. Third, Samgukyusa is supplementary to other history books of the times rather than to only one book. Guksa and Seungjeon are referred more than 12 times in Samgukyusa, which supports the argument that Samgukyusa is complementary to the missing story in Guksa and Seungjeon. Fourth, in Samgukyusa most chapters dealing with the Goguryeo history depend on the material from Shilla as well as the Chinese material which occupies 40%. This indicates that the archives of Goguryeo was not preserved in the 13th century.
Abstract
This study is an analysis on the chapters about Goguryeo in Samgukyusa. The result of the analysis is as following. First, Samgukyusa is assumed to have a number of authors other than Ilyeon himself. It is proved by a fact that none of the articles regarding Goguryeo cites the authority in book 5, apparently written by Ilyeon, while only two articles are found in book 4, signed by Mugeuk. Difference in the verification of the reference can be an evidence for the possible existence of other authors of Samgukyusa. Second, Samgukyusa can be considered a report on the history of Goguryeo as much as the history of Shilla. According to this study, 41.8-44.9% of Samgukyusa is about Goguryeo. Third, Samgukyusa is supplementary to other history books of the times rather than to only one book. Guksa and Seungjeon are referred more than 12 times in Samgukyusa, which supports the argument that Samgukyusa is complementary to the missing story in Guksa and Seungjeon. Fourth, in Samgukyusa most chapters dealing with the Goguryeo history depend on the material from Shilla as well as the Chinese material which occupies 40%. This indicates that the archives of Goguryeo was not preserved in the 13th century.
참고문헌 (20)
- 강인숙, "구삼국사의 본기와 지", 력사과학, 4 (1985)
- 今西龍, "신라사연구" (1970), 국서간행회
- 남동신, "『三國遺事』의 史書로서의 特性", 불교학연구, 16 (2007), 불교학연구회
- 末松保和, "舊三國史と三國史記 in: 청구사초2" (1966)
- 박대재, "『三國遺事』판본의 몇가지 문제점 in: 점교 삼국유사" (2009), 고려대학교 출판부
- 손진태, "삼국유사의 사회사적 고찰", 학풍, 2(1) (1981)
- 申瀅植, "三國史記 硏究" (1981), 一潮閣
- 이기백, "삼국사기론", 문학과 지성, 26 (1976)
- 이만열, "17〜8세기의 사서와 고대사인식", 한국사연구, 10 (1974)
- 이우성, "이조후기 근기학파에 있어서의 정통론의 전개", 역사학보, 31 (1966)
- 조법종, "고구려의 마한계승 인식론에 대한 검토", 한국사연구, 102 (1998)
- 津田左右吉, "津田左右吉全集 11－滿鮮地理硏究1" (1964), 岩波書店
- 坂本太郞, "日本書紀の分註について in: 日本古代史の基礎的硏究 上" (1978), 동경대학교 출판부
- 河廷龍, "『三國遺事』最高本의 刊行時期ー鶴山趙鍾業所蔵古板本을 통한 接近ー", 史學硏究, 55 (1998), 韓国史学会
- 河廷龍, "『三国遺事』의 편찬과 간행에 대한 연구", 박사, pp.2005
- 河廷龍, "校勘譯註 『三国遺事』－原本復原을 위한 三國遺事傳" (2003), 時空社
- 河廷龍, "『三国遺事』 の讃に対する一考察", 古代文化, 53(3) (2001), 古代学協会
- 李康來, "本史와 遺事 in: 月雲스님古稀紀念 佛敎學論叢" (1998), 同論叢刊行委員會
- 河廷龍, "『三國遺事』 所引 ｢古記｣, 考", 書誌學報, 23 (1999), 韓国書誌学会
- 하정용, "≪日本帝紀≫와 ≪日本帝記≫를 통해서 본 ≪三國遺事≫의 사료비판—延烏郞細烏女條와 元聖大王條의 後註를 중심으로 한 原典論—", 신라사학보, 12(12), pp.273~307 (2008), 신라사학회