본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

로봇 엔지니어링 모델 기반 STEM프로그램 설계 및 개발

Design and Development of STEM Program Based on Robotics Engineering Educational Model

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

국제학업성취도 비교 연구에 따르면 우리나라 학생들은 과학·수학교과에서 높은 수준의 학업성취결과를 나타낸반면 학습 동기는 상대적으로 낮게 나타났다. 이에 본 연구는 엔지니어링 수업 모델을 적용한 로봇활용 STEM 융합교육 프로그램을 개발하였다. 프로그램의 주제는 4학년 과학교육과정의 한 단원이면서 학생들에게 친숙하고 로봇의활용이 효과적인 ‘동물’로 정하였다. 로봇활용 STEM 프로그램은 로봇소양교육, 주제관련 교과학습, 엔지니어링 교육활동의 세 영역으로 구성되었다. 개발된 STEM 프로그램은 현장교사 14명으로부터 검토를 받았으며 연구결과 로봇소양 유무에 상관없이 대부분의 교사가 프로그램의 목표, 내용 구성, 로봇의 활용에 대해 긍정적 반응을 나타내었다.

Abstract

According to a comparison study of international academic achievements, Korean students showed high academic achievements in science and mathematics, whereas their learning motivation appeared relatively low. Therefore, this work developed the robot-based STEM integrated education program reflecting an engineering class model. The title of the program is determined as ‘animals’ which are included in one section of the fourth grade science curriculum, are friendly to students, and are effective for robot application. Robot-based STEM program is consisted of three areas: robot education, subject-related course learning, and engineering education. The STEM program was reviewed by 14 teachers. The study result presented that regardless of knowledge of robot, most teachers gave positive response to program goal, composition of contents, application of robot.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. 교육과학기술위원회, "한국의 .레오나르도 다 빈치., 융합인재교육으로 키운다", science & technologyfocus, 66 (2011)
  2. 권순범, "STEAM 기반 통합교과 학습이 초등학생의 창의적 인성에 미치는 영향", 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지, 17(2), pp.79~86 (2012), 한국컴퓨터정보학회
  3. 김경현, "로봇활용수업이 학생의 학습몰입 향상에 미치는 효과", 컴퓨터교육학회 논문지, 14(2), pp.1~12 (2011), 한국컴퓨터교육학회
  4. OECD 학업성취도 국제비교 연구(PISA 2009)결과보고서, "김경희", ~ (2010)
  5. 박정호, "초등학교에서 로봇을 활용한 STEAM 교육의 적용 연구", 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지, 17(4)통권 : 97, pp.19~29 (2012), 한국컴퓨터정보학회
  6. 송정범, "교육용 로봇을 활용한 STEM 통합교육의 효과성 연구", 한국컴퓨터정보학회논문지, 15(6), pp.81~89 (2010), 한국컴퓨터정보학회
  7. PISA 2006 결과분석 연구 -과학적 소양, 읽기 소양, 수학적 소양수준 및 배경변인 분석-, "이미경", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고 RRE 2007-1 (2007)
  8. 이철현, "실과 교과 중심의 STEAM 융합인재교육 모형 개발", 한국실과교육학회지, 24(4), pp.139~161 (2011), 한국실과교육학회
  9. 유인환, "창의적 문제해결력 신장을 위한 로봇 프로그래밍의 가능성 탐색", 교육과학연구, 36(2), pp.109~128 (2005), 교육과학연구소
  10. 한정혜, "초등정규교육과정에서 STEAM을 위한 로봇활용교육", 정보교육학회논문지, 15(3), pp.483~491 (2011), 한국정보교육학회
  11. 홍기천, "교육용 로봇을 활용한 초등학교 과학교과의 STEAM교육 수업 방안", 정보교육학회논문지, 17(1), pp.83~91 (2013), 한국정보교육학회
  12. Alimisis, D., "constructionism and robotics in education In Teacher education on robotics-enhanced constructivist pedagogical methods" (2009), School of Pedagogical and Technological Education
  13. Bers. U, "Teachers as Designers: Integrating Robotics in Early Childhood Education", Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, AACE, pp.123~145 (2002)
  14. Bilgin, "The effects of hands-on activities incorporating a cooperative learning approach on eight grade students' science process skills and attitudes towards science", Journal of Baltic Science Education, 1(9), pp.27~37 (2006)
  15. Bradley S. Baker, "Robotics in K-12 Education : a new technology for learning" (2012), Information Science Reference
  16. Chan, M., "Look, it's turning! Factors Affecting Structural and Functional Knowledge Acquistion in an Elementary School Robotics Classroom", Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2007, pp.1626~1631 (2007), AACE
  17. Dimitris, A, "Teacher Education on Robotics-Enhanced constructivist Pedagogical Methods" (2009), school of Pedagogical and Technological Education(ASPETE)
  18. Eguchi, A., "Educational Robotics for Elementary School Classroom", Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2007, pp.2542~2549 (2007), AACE
  19. Lamer, J., "7 essentials for project-based learning", Educational Leadership, 68(1), pp.34~37 (2010)
  20. Lindh, J., "Does lego training stimulate pupils?ability to solve logical problems?", Computers & Education, 49, pp.1097~1111 (2007)
  21. Massachusetts Science and Technology, "Engineering Curriculum Framework", Massachusetts Department of Education, 2006
  22. Mauch, E., "Using technology innovations to improve the problem-solving skills of middle school students: Educators' Experiences with the Lego Mindstorms robotic invention system", The Clearing House, 74(4), pp.211~213 (2001)
  23. Miller, D. P., "Robots for education In Springer handbook of robotics", pp.1283~1301 (2008), Springer-Verlag
  24. Napier, J.D., "Relationship between affective determinants and achievement in science for seventeen-year-olds", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(4), pp.365~383 (1985)
  25. Portsmore, M. D., "EXPLORING HOW EXPERIENCE WITH PLANNING IMPACTS FIRST GRADE STUDENTS?PLANNING AND SOLUTIONS TO ENGINEERING DESIGN PROBLEMS", 박사, pp.2009
  26. Sinclair, A. S., "Prediction making as an instructional strategy: Implications of teacher effects on learning, attitude toward science, and classroom participation", Journal of Research and Development in Education, 27(3), pp.153~161 (1994)
  27. (2009)[URL]
  28. Verner, I. M., "Robot Contest as a Laboratory for Experiential Engineering Education", Journal on Educational Resources in Computing, 4(2), pp.1~15 (2004)
  29. Wing-Mui SO, W., "Constructivist teaching in primary science", Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 3(1) (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)