김영삼․김대중․노무현 정부의 행정개혁에 관한 탐색적 비교 연구
An Exploratory Comparative Study on the Administrative Reform of Youngsam Kim'sㆍDaejung Kim'sㆍMuhyeon Ro's Government
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study is focused on the comparative analysis of administrative reform of Youngsam Kim' / Daejung Kim's / Muhyeon Ro‘s Government. 1)As a goal of administrative reform, YS's Government focused on the small and strong Government, DJ''s-on the overcome of the IMF Economic Crisis, Ro's -on the regional equal development. 2)As a motivation of administrative reform, YS's Government transferred Military Government into People Government, DJ's-the regime transformation from the governing party to the party out of power, Ro’s-the power transformation from the Kim's ruling party to the Ro‘s ruling party. 3)as a manager of administrative reform, YS's Government wais the council of administrative renovation, DJ's-the council of planning budget, Ro’s-the council of government innovation decentralization of power. 4)As a scope of administrative reform, YS's Government emphasized on the structure reform centering for organizational change, DJ's -on the public, enterprise, financial banking, and labor, Ro‘s-on the more right sizing reform than down sizing reform. 5)As a characteristic of administrative reform, three governments picked up all the harmony reform of bottom up and top down. 6)As a performance of administrative reform, YS's Government got to the real-name accounting system and the registration of the public officel property, DJ's-gain to the public sector reform and the overcoming of foreign exchange crisis, Ro’s-to the many sides evaluation and the formation of high ranking officials corporation. 7)As a implication of administrative reform, YS's Government had the transparency of public administration and globalization, DJ's-the privatization of public enterprise and the structure adjustment of Jaebal Company, Ro‘s- the change and reform centering for more software than hardware.
Abstract
This study is focused on the comparative analysis of administrative reform of Youngsam Kim' / Daejung Kim's / Muhyeon Ro‘s Government. 1)As a goal of administrative reform, YS's Government focused on the small and strong Government, DJ''s-on the overcome of the IMF Economic Crisis, Ro's -on the regional equal development. 2)As a motivation of administrative reform, YS's Government transferred Military Government into People Government, DJ's-the regime transformation from the governing party to the party out of power, Ro’s-the power transformation from the Kim's ruling party to the Ro‘s ruling party. 3)as a manager of administrative reform, YS's Government wais the council of administrative renovation, DJ's-the council of planning budget, Ro’s-the council of government innovation decentralization of power. 4)As a scope of administrative reform, YS's Government emphasized on the structure reform centering for organizational change, DJ's -on the public, enterprise, financial banking, and labor, Ro‘s-on the more right sizing reform than down sizing reform. 5)As a characteristic of administrative reform, three governments picked up all the harmony reform of bottom up and top down. 6)As a performance of administrative reform, YS's Government got to the real-name accounting system and the registration of the public officel property, DJ's-gain to the public sector reform and the overcoming of foreign exchange crisis, Ro’s-to the many sides evaluation and the formation of high ranking officials corporation. 7)As a implication of administrative reform, YS's Government had the transparency of public administration and globalization, DJ's-the privatization of public enterprise and the structure adjustment of Jaebal Company, Ro‘s- the change and reform centering for more software than hardware.
참고문헌 (68)
- 김근세, "작은 정부: 김영상 행정부의 정부 규모에 대한 실증적 분석", 한국행정학보, 31(3), pp.275~293 (1997)
- 김수영, "총합 행정개혁론" (1996), 서울: 법률계
- 김종찬, "행정개혁의 본질에 관한 연구", 강남논총, 22 (1992)
- 김정렬, "행정개혁론: 국제비교와 실증분석" (2008), 박영사
- 김판석, "관리혁신과 행태변화를 통한 새로운 행정개혁의 방향 모색", 한국행정학보, 28(3) (1994)
- 남궁근, "개방형직위제도 시행의 중간평가", 행정논총, 38(2), pp.23~31 (2000)
- 일본의 지역경제 활성화 추진에 관한 연구, "대외경제정책연구원", 재정 경제부 특구운영의 성과에 관한 용역보고서, ~ (2004)
- 문명재, "작고 강한 정부를 위한 탐색적 연구: 정부의 규모(size), 기능(scope), 역량(Strength)을 중심으로", 한국행정학회 하계학술대회 발표 논문 (2006)
- 민진, "조직관리론" (1996), 서울: 대영문화사
- 박연호, "조직관리론" (1985), 서울: 법문사
- 박희봉, "책임운영기관제도 도입상 문제점과 발전방향", 한국정책학회보, 10(2), pp.167~187 (2000)
- 신윤창, "지역발전이론의 비판적 이해와 지역공동체에 관한 탐색적 연구", 한국비교정부학보, 14(1), pp.217~244 (2010), 한국비교정부학회
- 신윤창, "사회갈등의 원인구조와 해결방안에 관한 탐색적 연구 - 거버넌스를 중심으로", 한국비교정부학보, 14(2), pp.161~184 (2010), 한국비교정부학회
- 안해균, "행정개혁의 이론화를 위한 한 시론", 행정논총, 24(2) (1986)
- 안해균, "정책학원론" (1987), 서울: 다산문화사
- 오석홍, "조직이론" (1990), 서울: 박영사
- 오석홍, "행정개혁론" (1999), 서울: 박영사
- 오석홍, "개혁실패의 원인", 행정논총, 32(3) (1996)
- 은재호, "참여정부 정부혁신의 보편성과 독자성: 해외 정부혁신 사례와의 비교" (2005), 한국행정연구원
- 이달곤, "지방정부론" (2004), 서울: 박영사
- 이도형, "비교발전행정론" (2007), 서울: 박영사
- 이선우, "지방행정에 대한 시민 평가제 도입의 방안에 관한 연구: 도 입형태와 방법론을 중심으로", 한국정책학회 동계학술대회 발표논문집 (1997)
- 이시원, "행정전통과 행정개혁: 영미 행정전통을 통한 한국행정개혁 분석", 한국행정학회 동계학술대회 발표논문 (2004)
- 이윤식, "정부성과관리와 평가제도" (2006), 서울: 대영문화사
- 이종범, "행정개혁과 저항-행정쇄신위원회 3년간 활동을 중심으로", 행정과정책, (12) (1996), 고려대 행정문제연구소
- 이종수, "정부혁신의 메커니즘과 전략" (2005), 서울: 대영문화사
- 이종수, "새 행정학" (2005), 서울: 대영문화사
- 이흥배, "일본 구조개혁특구의 특징과 시사점", 자치행정 (2005)
- 임정덕, "지방화시대의 지역산업정책: 패러다임 변화 속의 지역의 역할과 기능" (1996), 서울: 비봉출판사
- 장은주, "동북아시대 정부역할의 제고: 한국과 일본의 지방분권화 개혁", 한국행정학회 추계학술대회 발표논문 (2003)
- 조석준, "조직론" (1986), 서울: 법문사
- 조연숙, "지방정부의 평가 및 성과관리 실태에 관한 연구", 한국행정학회 하계학술대회 논문집 (2006)
- 행자부 중앙인사위원회, "총액인건비제 매뉴얼", 조직관리혁신포럼 (2006)
- 조택, "로컬 거버넌스 체계의 형성방안에 관한 연구 -신용협동기구를 중심으로-", 한국비교정부학보, 13(2), pp.323~342 (2009), 한국비교정부학회
- 총무처, "신정부혁신론" (1997)
- 최영출, "사회적 기업간 네트워크 작동에 관한 연구", 한국비교정부학보, 14(1), pp.63~76 (2010), 한국비교정부학회
- 최영출, "사회적 기업 활동의 평가지표에 관한 연구", 한국비교정부학보, 14(1), pp.245~260 (2010), 한국비교정부학회
- 행정개혁위원회, "행정개혁에 관한 건의" (1989)
- 윤정로, "21세기의 한국 사회학" (1994), 문학과 지성사
- "구조개혁특구의 가능성"[URL]
- 安達智則, "자치체 구조개혁’비판: NPM행혁’에서 시민의 자치체로" (2004), 동경: 旬報社
- Anderson, S, "Organizational Status and Performance: The Case of Swedish Pharmacies", Public Administration, 73 (1995)
- Barzelay, Michael, "The New Public Management: Improving Research and Policy Dialogue" (2001), California: Univ. of California Press
- Burke W. W., "Organization Development: A Normative View" (1987), Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company
- Bozeman, B., "Bureaucratic Red Tape and Formalization: Untangling Conceptual Knots", American Review of Public Administration, 26(1) (1996)
- Bozeman, B., "Bureaucracy and Red Tape" (2000), New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc
- Caiden Gerald E, "Administrative Reform" (1969), Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company
- Caiden Gerald E, "Development Administrative Capacity and Administrative Reform", International Review of Administrative Science, 38(1) (1974)
- Caiden Gerald E, "Public Administration. 2nd ed" (1982), Calif: Palisades Pub
- Caiden Gerald E, "Administrative Reform Comes of Age" (1991), Berlin: Walter deGruyter & Company
- Cohen, Steven, "A Strategic Framework for Developing Responsibility and Functions from Government to the Private Sector", Public Administration Review, 61(4) (2001)
- Daniel Robey, "Designing Organization" (1986), Homewood: Richard D. Irwin, Inc
- DeLeon Linda, "The Political Theory of Reinvention", Public Administration Review, 60(2) (2000)
- Easton K, "Information Technology and Organizational Change" (1988), London: Taylor & Francis Ltd
- Henderson G, "Korea: The Politics of the Vortex" (1968), Boston: Harvard Univ. Press
- Katz D, "The Social Psychology of Organizations" (1987), New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc
- Kettl, Donald F, "The Global Public Management Revolution" (2000), Washington D. C.: Brookings Institution Press
- Knott, Jack H., "Reforming Bureaucracy: The Politics of International Choice" (1987), Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs
- Lawson, M, "Why Performance Matters", Public Management (2006)
- Montgomery John D, "Sources of Administrative Reform: Problems of Power, Purpose and Politics" (1967), Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press
- Morgan David R, "The Two Face of Privatization", Public Administration Review, 58(6) (1988)
- Musicus Milton, "Reappraizing Reorganization", Public Administration Review, 24(2) (1964)
- Posner Marshall, "Privatization: The Frontier between Public and Private", Policy Studies, 5 (1984)
- Preston Michael B, "The Politics of Bureaucratic Reform" (1984), Urbana: Univ. of Illinois Press
- Starr Paul, "The Limits of Privatization" (1987), Washington D.C.: Economic Policy Institute