Fukushima Nuclear Accident: Cyber Communities' Voices in East Asia
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
To better ascertain the needs of East Asian countries adjacent to the Fukushima Nuclear Accident, we conducted an analysis of 48 East-Asian websites from the day of accident from March 2011 to September 2012. Subjects included published or broadcast news articles, blogs, and new media outlet such as YouTube videos that were produced in the area. The data are systemically collected by using same searching words, including “Fukushima” in three local languages, such as Chinese, Korean and Japanese. The search method leaded a quasi-random sampling. The chosen websites have replies, which are the unit of analysis in this study. The study set up a typology of classifying patterns in replies, which consists of a two-by-two matrix of publicness vs. privateness and policy narratives vs. policy monopoly. This study aimed to reconcile two different approaches of qualitative and quantitative analyses. This format gave a more affluent implication of the actualization of a typology with respect to the Fukushima Nuclear Accident. The result of chi-square test showed that the response types are statistically dependent on countries where the accident occurred. In detail, the model effect size represented a moderate magnitude (Cramer's V = .321). That is, East Asian countries have different responses on the Fukushima Nuclear Accident according to the typology.
Abstract
To better ascertain the needs of East Asian countries adjacent to the Fukushima Nuclear Accident, we conducted an analysis of 48 East-Asian websites from the day of accident from March 2011 to September 2012. Subjects included published or broadcast news articles, blogs, and new media outlet such as YouTube videos that were produced in the area. The data are systemically collected by using same searching words, including “Fukushima” in three local languages, such as Chinese, Korean and Japanese. The search method leaded a quasi-random sampling. The chosen websites have replies, which are the unit of analysis in this study. The study set up a typology of classifying patterns in replies, which consists of a two-by-two matrix of publicness vs. privateness and policy narratives vs. policy monopoly. This study aimed to reconcile two different approaches of qualitative and quantitative analyses. This format gave a more affluent implication of the actualization of a typology with respect to the Fukushima Nuclear Accident. The result of chi-square test showed that the response types are statistically dependent on countries where the accident occurred. In detail, the model effect size represented a moderate magnitude (Cramer's V = .321). That is, East Asian countries have different responses on the Fukushima Nuclear Accident according to the typology.
참고문헌 (15)
- Antonsen, M., "The “Publicness” of Public Organization", Public Administration, 75(2), pp.337~357 (1997)
- Bamgartner, Frank, "Agenda and Instability in American Politics" (1993), University of Chicago Press
- Bozeman, B., "All Organizations are Public: Comparing Public and Private Organizations" (1987), Jossey-Bass
- Bozeman, B., "Public Value Failure: When Efficient Markets May Not Do", Public Administration Review, 62(2), pp.145~161 (2002)
- Bozeman, B., "Public Values and Public Interest: Counterbalancing Economic Individualism" (2007), Georgetown University Press
- Burrell, Gibson, "Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis" (1979), Heinemann
- Craig, S., "Internet Governance Goes Global. In Vendulka Kubakova, In International Relationas in a Constructed World" (1998), M.E.Sharpe
- De Ayala, R. J., "The Theory and Practice of Item Response Theory" (2009), The Guilford Press
- Haque, M. S., "The Diminishing Publicness of Public Service under the Current Mode of Governance", Public Administration Review, 61(1), pp.65~82 (2001)
- Jorgensen, T. B., "Public Values: An Inventory", Administration & Society, 39(3), pp.354~381 (2007)
- Moulton, Stephanie, "Putting Together the Publicness Puzzle: A Framework for Realized Publicness", Public Administration Review, 69(5), pp.889~900 (2009)
- Perry, James L., "The Public-Private Distinction in Organization Theory: A Critique and Research Strategy", Academy of Management Review, 13(2), pp.182~201 (1988)
- Sabatier, P. A., "Theories of the Policy Process" (2007), Westview Press
- Shanahan, Elizabeth A, "Policy Narratives and Policy Processes", Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), pp.535~556 (2011)
- Stevens, Stanley Smith, "On the Theory of Scales of Measurement", Science, 103(2684), pp.677~680 (1946)