본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일본과 중국의 철도정책사례를 통한 경험과 교훈

The Experience and Lessons from Japanese and Chinese Railway Policy

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류행정학

초록

Vertical Separation means the functional division by the owner of fixed facilities such as sites, lines, and signals from the transportation service operation using them. The separation has produced some limitations and challenges to reform. The cases of Japan and China show many policy implications. The advantages which accrue from vertical integration are: first, the harmony of construction and management results in not producer-oriented but customer-oriented operations that enhance consumer service and investment efficiency. Second, the enhancing of competitiveness of the railroad industry provides a chance to prepare a logistic hub and gate for East Asian railroad transportation by utilizing south and continental railroad system. Third, the development of station complexes may contribute ultimately to retaining railroad fares due to expanding diverse service projects and create station-centered culture. Finally, this reform also contributes to strengthening national competitiveness by enhancing responsiveness to the expansion of the world railroad market and global trends in the railroad industry.

Abstract

Vertical Separation means the functional division by the owner of fixed facilities such as sites, lines, and signals from the transportation service operation using them. The separation has produced some limitations and challenges to reform. The cases of Japan and China show many policy implications. The advantages which accrue from vertical integration are: first, the harmony of construction and management results in not producer-oriented but customer-oriented operations that enhance consumer service and investment efficiency. Second, the enhancing of competitiveness of the railroad industry provides a chance to prepare a logistic hub and gate for East Asian railroad transportation by utilizing south and continental railroad system. Third, the development of station complexes may contribute ultimately to retaining railroad fares due to expanding diverse service projects and create station-centered culture. Finally, this reform also contributes to strengthening national competitiveness by enhancing responsiveness to the expansion of the world railroad market and global trends in the railroad industry.

참고문헌 (60)

  1. 철도산업구조개혁 자료집, "국토해양부", ~ (2010)
  2. 김남이, "중국의 중앙정부와 지방정부의 관계 - 행정‧정치‧경제 및 재정 시스템의 분권화를 중심으로 -", 한국비교정부학보, 12(1), pp.19~44 (2008), 한국비교정부학회
  3. 김남이, "중국 서부대개발 정책과 소수민족 이익에 관한 연구 : 정책적 측면과 이익주체에 관한 분석", 한국비교정부학보, 16(2), pp.23~50 (2012), 한국비교정부학회
  4. 김남이, "중국의 지역발전전략과 패러다임 적용에 관한 고찰: 균형성장론과 불균형성장론 간의 비교론적 접근을 중심으로", 한국비교정부학보, 17(2), pp.125~152 (2013), 한국비교정부학회
  5. 김성록, "중국의 지역간 경제지표를 이용한 지역개발정책의 효과분석 -10․5계획 전후를 중심으로-", 한국비교정부학보, 14(1), pp.1~14 (2010), 한국비교정부학회
  6. 세계철도연맹, "통계연감" (2009)
  7. 송재복, "공기업선진화방안과 지역갈등 - 한국토지주택공사 지방이전과 관련된 갈등을 중심으로 -", 한국자치행정학보, 23(2), pp.63~87 (2009), 한국자치행정학회
  8. 양근율, "외국 철도구조 개혁의 최근동향 분석 및 한국 철도구조 개혁에의 시사점 - 철도경쟁력과 관련하여", 한국철도학회 2001년 추계학술대회 (2001)
  9. 윤칠석, "일본 도시재생정책에 있어서 민관파트너십: 키타큐슈 에코타운 사례를 중심으로", 한국비교정부학보, 16(1), pp.115~136 (2012), 한국비교정부학회[DOI]
  10. 일본철도의 역사와 발전, "이용상 외", 한국철도기술연구원, ~ (2005)
  11. 이용상, "A study of Rail Reform of Japan - Focusing on privatization with the UK-", 아시아연구, 13(1), pp.1~28 (2010), 한국아시아학회
  12. 위정수, "역세권 활성화 방안에 관한 국내외 사례 비교 연구", 2009한국철도학회 가을 학술대회 발표대회논문집, pp.636~647 (2009)
  13. 정봉현, "호남고속철도 개통에 대비한 광주권 고속철도역의 운영 및 역세권 개발방향", 지역개발연구, pp.123~144 (2009)
  14. 일본의 고속철도 역세권 개발사례, "조남건", 국토연구원, ~ (2005)
  15. 최연혜, "상하분리에 관한 견해들", 철도정책과 경영 (2007)
  16. 왕보, "Urbanization Process and Policies in China", 한국비교정부학보, 17(3), pp.1~16 (2013), 한국비교정부학회
  17. Fan-Fing, "중국 지방정부의 공업 삼폐오염 영향요인 및 저감방안 연구 - 회색관계분석을 중심으로 -", 한국비교정부학보, 15(3), pp.23~44 (2011), 한국비교정부학회
  18. Railway reforms,Do they influence operating efficiency?, "Asmild, M.", of Openhagen, Department of Economics, ~, pp.08-05 (2008)
  19. Bitzan, J. D., "Railroad Costs and Competition, The Implications of Introducing Competition to Raiload Networks", Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 37(3), pp.201~225 (2003)
  20. Railways, Privatization and Regulation of Transport Infrastructure,Guidelines for Policy makers and Regulators, "Campos, J.", World Bank Institute Development Studies, 171~234 (2000)
  21. Cantos, P., "Productivity, efficiency and technical change in the european railways,A non-parametric approach", Transportation, 26(4), pp.337~357 (1999)
  22. Reforming Europe's Railways,An Assessment of Progress, "CER", Eurailpress, ~ (2005)
  23. Coelli, T., "A comparison of parametric and non-parametric distance functions, With application to european railways", European Journal of Operational Research, 117(2), pp.326~339 (1999)
  24. DCR., "China,Reform and Development of Railway Transport under the Policy of Reform and Opening Up to the Outside World", The Development Research Center. Beijing, China for an OECD, 2001, ~
  25. Drew, J., "The Costs and Benefits of Different Railway Structures", pp.2006
  26. Railway Reform and Charges for the Use of Infrastructure, "ECMT", OECD, ~ (2005)
  27. Färe, R., "Multi-output Production and Duality,Theory and Applications" (1995), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  28. An Analysis of Vertical Separation of Railways, "Fumio KUROSAKI.", The University of Leeds Institute for Transport Studies, ~ (2008)
  29. Friebel, G., "Railway (De)Regulation,A european efficiency comparison", Economica(forthcoming) (2008)
  30. Testing for economies of scope in european railways,An efficiency analysis, "Growitsch, C.", University of Lüneburg, Working Paper Series in Economics No. 72, ~ (2007)
  31. Gathon, H. J., "Decomposing efficiency into its managerial and its regulatory components, The case of european railways", European Journal of Operational Research, 80(3), pp.500~507 (1995)
  32. Ivaldi, M., "Density and Integration Effects on Class I U. S. Freight Railroads", Journal of Regulatory Economics, 19, pp.161~182 (2001)
  33. Annual Report, "Japan Railway.", ~ (2010)
  34. M. J. Farrell., "The measurement of productive efficiency", Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120(3), pp.253~281 (1957)
  35. Nash, C., "Railway Reform in China", Transport Reviews, 20(1), pp.25~48 (2000)
  36. Oum, T. H., "Economic efficiency of railways and implications for public policy, A comparative study of the OECD countries' railways", Journal of Transport Economics & Policy, 28(2), pp.121~138 (1994)
  37. Pittman, R., "Railway Reform and Competition, Options for China", OECD, 2002, ~
  38. Savas, E. S., "Privatization", pp.5~ (1987), Chatham House Publishers, Inc
  39. Trujillo, C. R., "Measuring the Productivity and Efficiency of Railways(An International Comparison), ITS Thesis", ITS, pp.2004
  40. 蒋媛媛, ""网运分离"模式在中国铁路的可行性研究", 产业经济研究, 43, pp.73~79 (2009)
  41. 李红昌, "关于我国铁路改革与发展路径选择的若干思考", 铁道经济研究, 13(1), pp.39~46 (2005)
  42. 刘世锦, "中国铁路改革与重组模式, 第三种选择", 中国工业经济, 21(3), pp.28~33 (2003)
  43. 齐庆祝, "铁路投资公司经营模式及发展路径研究", 北京交通大学学报, 10(1), pp.24~28 (2011)
  44. 司维, "中国铁路改革的前景探讨", 现代商贸工业, 22(8), pp.8~9 (2009)
  45. 杨斌, "日本铁路改革及启示", "铁道经济研究", 8(2), pp.43~45 (2000)
  46. 喻文光, "论铁路改革的法治化路径", 国家行政学院学报, 15(2), pp.93~97 (2013)
  47. 张长青, "日本铁路法制对我国铁路发展的影响及其启示-国外铁路改革与立法研究之一", 生产力研究, 21(1), pp.139~185 (2006)
  48. 周新军, "中国铁路改革,特殊性、困境及基本思路", 经济界, 100, pp.70~75 (2012)
  49. 左大杰, "铁路网运分离的必要性与实施路径", 综合运输, 35(7), pp.44~52 (2013)
  50. 草野厚, "国鉄改革", pp.46~48 (1989), 中公新書
  51. 大宮市, "大宮の昔と現在", pp.12~13 (1980)
  52. 일본정책투자은행, , 今日の注目指標, 101(1), pp.1~ (2006)
  53. "JR東日本"[URL]
  54. "JR西日本"[URL]
  55. "中国铁路总公司"[URL]
  56. "中华人民共和国国家发展和改革委员会"[URL]
  57. "中华人民共和国国家统计局"[URL]
  58. "中华人民共和国中央人民政府"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)