생계부양형태별 아동돌봄의 차이
Childcare Types and Breadwinner Model
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study is to empirically verify whether there is any difference in the breadwinner model about the child care of households with infant. Selecting the child care type in individual households is closely related depending on which way parents participate in paid work. So this paper analyzes the differences in the child care paying attention to breadwinner model separated by paid work and care association. The results are as follows. First, the older and the higher the education level mother has to child-rearing, the lower the possibility of non-parental care. It is found that the likelihood of the alternative care of children is to increase based on the large number of household members, having high household income, and increasing age of the child. Second, mother's employment condition shows the decisive factors for deciding the alternative care for nurturing children. On the other hand, the impact of father's employment is not a statistically significant level for the non-parental care. Third, it is found that the likelihood of alternative care is to increase when father has a part time job than the self-employed. Mother's social status is not statistically significant level for the effect of alternative care. Fourth, the possibility of alternative care is low when the male supports the form of livelihood. The effect of alternative care option depending on the double form of livelihood support is not statistically significant.
Abstract
This study is to empirically verify whether there is any difference in the breadwinner model about the child care of households with infant. Selecting the child care type in individual households is closely related depending on which way parents participate in paid work. So this paper analyzes the differences in the child care paying attention to breadwinner model separated by paid work and care association. The results are as follows. First, the older and the higher the education level mother has to child-rearing, the lower the possibility of non-parental care. It is found that the likelihood of the alternative care of children is to increase based on the large number of household members, having high household income, and increasing age of the child. Second, mother's employment condition shows the decisive factors for deciding the alternative care for nurturing children. On the other hand, the impact of father's employment is not a statistically significant level for the non-parental care. Third, it is found that the likelihood of alternative care is to increase when father has a part time job than the self-employed. Mother's social status is not statistically significant level for the effect of alternative care. Fourth, the possibility of alternative care is low when the male supports the form of livelihood. The effect of alternative care option depending on the double form of livelihood support is not statistically significant.
참고문헌 (25)
- 김수정, "스웨덴 가족정책의 삼중동학: 탈상품화, 탈가족화, 탈젠더화", 가족과 문화, 18(4), pp.1~33 (2006), 한국가족학회
- 김윤정, "영유아 돌봄 유형에 대한 탐색적 연구: 보육정책을 중심으로", 아시아여성연구, 48(2), pp.221~259 (2009), 아시아여성연구소
- 김진미, "영아 자녀를 둔 가구의 양육형태 및 영향요인 분석", 한국영유아보육학, (86), pp.239~258 (2014), 한국영유아보육학회
- 마경희, "사회권으로서 돌봄의 제도화를 위한 대안적 패러다임의 모색", 여성과 사회, 16, pp.35~66 (2005)
- 배성희, "취업모의 영아보육 선택에 영향을 미치는 요인 연구", 생활과학연구논총, 15(2), pp.21~29 (2011)
- 송다영, "보육서비스 정책 개편 쟁점에 관한 연구 - 돌봄에 관한 자유선택론에 대한 비판과 대안모색 -", 한국사회복지학, 63(3), pp.285~307 (2011), 한국사회복지학회[DOI]
- 안미영, "The Changing Shape of Care-time Diamond: Social Care Expansions in the 21st Century in Korea", 한국사회정책, 19(2), pp.137~161 (2012), 한국사회정책학회[DOI]
- 안재진, "미취학아동 가족의 보육·교육서비스 선택에 영향을 미치는 요인", 여성연구, (2), pp.5~36 (2010), 한국여성정책연구원
- 윤성호, "아동 돌봄의 사회적 분담이 여성의 임금수준과 전일제 고용에 미치는 영향", 한국가족복지학, (25), pp.201~236 (2009), 한국가족사회복지학회[DOI]
- 윤자영, "외환위기 이후 기혼가구의 노동공급 변화 요인", 여성경제연구, 9(1), pp.99~122 (2012), 한국여성경제학회[DOI]
- 윤홍식, "OECD 21개국의 부모권과 노동권 보장수준을 통해 본 가족정책의 비교연구: 부모휴가와 아동보육시설 관련 정책을 중심으로", 한국사회복지학, 58(3), pp.341~370 (2006), 한국사회복지학회
- 윤홍식, "가구특성과 취학 전 아동양육형태의 자유선택- 직접양육, 가족자원, 보육시설 -", 사회과학연구, 26(1), pp.1~26 (2010), 사회과학연구소
- 윤홍식, "남성일인생계부양자가구와 이인생계부양자가구의 소득특성과 빈곤실태", 가족과 문화, 19(4), pp.131~162 (2007), 한국가족학회[DOI]
- 미래 가족의 경제적 기능 변화 전망, "윤홍식", 정보통신정책연구원, ~ (2006)
- 장지연, "돌봄노동의 사회화 유형과 여성노동권", 페미니즘연구, 11(2), pp.1~47 (2011), 한국여성연구소
- 최상설, "아동돌봄 유형선택에 영향을 미치는 요인에 관한 연구:영아기 돌봄유형을 중심으로", 사회복지정책, 39(3), pp.29~57 (2012), 한국사회복지정책학회[DOI]
- Esping-Andersen, G., "Sociological Explanations of Changing Income Distributions", American Behavioral Scientist, 50(5), pp.639~658 (2007)
- Haas, L. & Hwang, P., "Parental Leave: Progress or Pitfall?: Research and Policy Issues in Europe", pp.1999, NIDI
- Jenson, J., "Who Cares? Women's Work, Childcare, and Welfare State Redesign", pp.88~117 (2001), University of Toronto Press
- Knijin, T., "Gender and Caring Dimension of Welfare States: Towards Inclusive Citizenship", Social Politics, 4(3), pp.182~185 (1997)
- Leira, A., "Caring as Social Right: Cash for Child Care and Daddy Leave", Social Politics, 5(3), pp.362~378 (1998)
- Lewis, J., "The Decline of the Male Breadwinner Model: Implications for Work and Care", Social Politics, 8(2), pp.152~170 (2001)
- Morel, N., "From Subsidiarity to 'Free Choice' : Child-and Elder-Care Policy Reforms in France, Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands", Social Policy & Administration, 41(6), pp.618~637 (2007)
- OECD, "Babies and bosses-reconciling work and family life(volume 1): Australia, Denmark and Netherlands" (2002)
- Taylor-Gooby, P, "New Risks, New Welfare", pp.1~28 (2004), Oxford University Press