한국의 시장주의와 평등주의적 거버넌스의 구성에 관한 일 고찰: 거버넌스의 제도동학적 맥락의 함의
A Thought on the Governance Construction of Marketism and Egalitarianism in Korea: Implications on the Contexts of Institutional Dynamics of Governance
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to find some implications on the Korean market and egalitarian governance in terms of the institutional contexts. For this purpose, first, this study gives rise to a constructivist typology of institutional dynamics on governance and analyzes on the Korean marketism and egalitarian governance with special reference to the contexts of institutional dynamics. The Korean governance on marketism shows relatively 'large' and 'weak' institutional contexts. This means that it still has been under the path dependency of its developmental state legacy. However market regulations based on fairness and social responsibility have not been effective to the chaebol economy. Egalitarian governance for risk management and welfare needs to be larger and stronger, but shows ideological or political steering problems especially on welfare policy. This study also shows the fact that the Korean chaebols are to be a target to reform in constructing the marketism governance, and, at the same time, they are major policy actors to be mobilized for egalitarian governance.
Abstract
This study aims to find some implications on the Korean market and egalitarian governance in terms of the institutional contexts. For this purpose, first, this study gives rise to a constructivist typology of institutional dynamics on governance and analyzes on the Korean marketism and egalitarian governance with special reference to the contexts of institutional dynamics. The Korean governance on marketism shows relatively 'large' and 'weak' institutional contexts. This means that it still has been under the path dependency of its developmental state legacy. However market regulations based on fairness and social responsibility have not been effective to the chaebol economy. Egalitarian governance for risk management and welfare needs to be larger and stronger, but shows ideological or political steering problems especially on welfare policy. This study also shows the fact that the Korean chaebols are to be a target to reform in constructing the marketism governance, and, at the same time, they are major policy actors to be mobilized for egalitarian governance.
참고문헌 (22)
- 사공일, "80년대 경제개혁과 김재익 수석" (2003), 삼성경제연구소
- 안병영, "민주주의, 평등, 그리고 행정: 한국행정 연구를 위한 이론적･경험적 함의를 찾아서", 한국행정학보, 41(3), pp.1~40 (2007), 한국행정학회
- 임혁백, "시장, 국가, 민주주의 : 한국 민주화와 정치경제이론" (1994), 사회비평사
- 임현진, "한국사회의 위험과 안전" (2003), 서울대 출판사
- 정성호, "중앙-지방 상생발전 가능한 거버넌스 대안 : 복지재정과 지방재정 간 관계를 중심으로", 한국비교정부학보, 19(2), pp.135~155 (2015), 한국비교정부학회[DOI]
- 최장집, "한국민주주의 무엇이 문제인가" (2008), 생각의 나무
- 프랜시스 후쿠야마, "강한 국가의 조건" (2005), 황금 가지
- "공정거래위원회 통계연보", ~ (2015)
- "뉴시스", ~ (2017)
- 거버넌스와 발전(Governance and Development), , 세계은행, ~ (1992)
- Bang, P. H., "Governance As Social and Political Communication" (2003), Manchester Univ. Press
- Beck, U., "Risk Society : Toward a New Modernity" (1972), Sage Publications
- Hoff, J., "Governance as Social and Political Communication" (2003), Manchester Univ. Press
- Hollingsworth, J. R., "Governing Capitalist Economics" (1994), Oxford Univ. Press
- Newman, J., "Modernizing Governance. New Labour, Policy and Society" (2001), Sage
- Portes, A., "Social capital : Its origin and application in modern sociology", Annul Review of Sociology, 24, pp.1~24 (1998)
- Putnam, R., "Making Democracy Work : Civic Tradition of Modern Italy" (1993), Princeton Univ. Press
- Rhodes, R. A., "Understanding Governance : Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity, and Accountability" (1997), Open Univ. Press
- Annul Report, "UNDP", ~ (1996)
- Wade, R., "Governing the Market: Economic Theory and The Role of Government In East Asian Industrialization" (1990), Princeton Univ. Press
- "Webster's Dictionary", ~ (1979)
- Williamson, O, E., "Transaction-cost Economy : the Governance of Contractual Eelations", Journal of Law and Economics, 22, pp.233~261 (1979)