A Study on the Moderating Role of Government Trust: South Korea, Japan, the United States, and Sweden
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
There has been two major pillar of research on trust in public administration: the factors affecting and consequences of trust and the role of trust. However, little study has been done regarding the role of trust in a relation with other values in public administration. We analyze the relations between trust, accountability, performance, and discretion examining how these four values are associated with each other. Then, we explore the causal relations of trust with the other critical values—performance, accountability, and discretion. Second, we analyze what kind of moderating effects of trust on two relationships—accountability and discretion, accountability and performance—are revealed. The unit of analysis is national level and we included South Korea, Japan, the United States, and Sweden for analysis and implications using the International Social Survey Program (ISSP) survey “The role of Government 2012.” From the results, we would argue that it seems positive to expect that trust in government could play a moderating role between competing values in public practice. Second, the statistical results confirmed partially the previous theory that performance affect positively to trust in public in the national level from four selective states.
Abstract
There has been two major pillar of research on trust in public administration: the factors affecting and consequences of trust and the role of trust. However, little study has been done regarding the role of trust in a relation with other values in public administration. We analyze the relations between trust, accountability, performance, and discretion examining how these four values are associated with each other. Then, we explore the causal relations of trust with the other critical values—performance, accountability, and discretion. Second, we analyze what kind of moderating effects of trust on two relationships—accountability and discretion, accountability and performance—are revealed. The unit of analysis is national level and we included South Korea, Japan, the United States, and Sweden for analysis and implications using the International Social Survey Program (ISSP) survey “The role of Government 2012.” From the results, we would argue that it seems positive to expect that trust in government could play a moderating role between competing values in public practice. Second, the statistical results confirmed partially the previous theory that performance affect positively to trust in public in the national level from four selective states.
참고문헌 (44)
- Aucoin, Peter, "The dialectics of accountability for performance in public management reform", International Review of Administrative Sciences, 66, pp.45~55 (2000)
- Behn, Robert D., "Rethinking Democratic Accountability" (2001), Brookings Institution
- Bertelli, Anthony M., "Madison’s Managers: Public Administration and the Constitution" (2006), The Johns Hopkins University Press
- Bovens, Mark, "Oxford Handbook of Public Management" (2005)
- Chi. Keon S., "Improving Responsiveness", Public Administration Review, 59(3), pp.278~280 (1999)
- Choudhury, Enamul, "Trust in Administration : An Integrative Approach to Optimal Trust", Administration & Society, 40(6), pp.586~620 (2008)
- Christensen, Tom, "Trust In Government : The Relative Importance of Service Satisfaction, Political Factors, and Demography", Public Performance & Management Review, 28(4), pp.487~511 (2005)
- Cooper, Christopher A., "The Importance of Trust in Government for Public Administration : The Case of Zoning", Public Administration Review, 68(3), pp.459~468 (2008)
- Danaee Fard, Hassan, "Promoting Public Trust in Public Organizations : Explaining the Role of Public Accountability", Public Organization Review, 7, pp.331~344 (2007)
- Denhardt, R. B., "Trust as capacity : The role of integrity and responsiveness", Public Organization Review, 2(1), pp.65~76 (2002)
- Dirks, Kurt T., "The Role of Trust in Organizational Settings", Organizational Science, 12(4), pp.450~467 (2001)
- Dubnick, Melvin, "Accountability and The Promise of Performance : in Search of the Mechanisms", Public Performance & Management Review, 28(3), pp.376~417 (2005)
- Forrer, John, "Public–Private Partnerships and the Public Accountability Question", Public Administration Review, 70(3), pp.475~484 (2010)
- Goodsell, Charles. T., "A New Vision for Public Administration", Public Administration Review, 66(4), pp.623~635 (2006)
- ARIEHALACHMI, "WHO GETS WHAT, WHEN, AND HOW:PERFORMANCE MEASURES FOR ACCOUNTABILITY?FOR IMPROVED PERFORMANCE?", International Review of Public Administration, 7(1), pp.85~95 (2002), 한국행정학회
- Hwang, Kwangseon, "Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance" (2018), Springer
- 황광선, "The Role of Trust in Public Management: Accountability and Discretion", 한국비교정부학보, 21(1), pp.1~18 (2017), 한국비교정부학회[DOI]
- Hwang, Kwangseon, "Accountability Practices in Public Child Welfare Services", International Journal of Public Administration, 39(8), pp.587~596 (2016)
- 황광선, "Responsible Government: Financial and Performance Accountability", 한국공공관리학보, 30(2), pp.131~152 (2016), 한국공공관리학회[DOI]
- Keele, Luke, "Social Capital and the Dynamics of Trust in Government", American Journal of Political Science, 51(2), pp.241~254 (2007)
- Kim, Seok-Eun, "The Role of Trust in the Modern Administrative State : An Integrative Model", Administration and Society, 37(5), pp.611~635 (2005)
- Kim, Soonhee, "Public Trust in Government in Japan and South Korea: Does the Rise of Critical Citizens Matter?", Public Administration Review, 70(5), pp.801~810 (2010)
- Koppell, Jonathan GS., "Pathologies of Accountability: ICANN and the Challenge of “Multiple Accountabilities Disorder”", Public Administration, 65(1), pp.94~108 (2005)
- Kramer, Robert, "Weaving the Public into Public Administration", Public Administration Review, 59(1), pp.89~92 (1999)
- Lerner, J. S., "Accounting for the effects of accountability", Psycho-logical Bulletin, 125(2), pp.255~275 (1999)
- Levi, Margaret, "Trust and Governance", pp.77~101 (1998), Russell Sage
- Maloy, Jason. S., "Two Concepts of Trust", The Journal of Politics, 71(2), pp.492~505 (2009)
- Mishler, William, "Political Support for Incomplete Democracies", International Political Science Review, 22(4), pp.303~320 (2001)
- Morrison, Bart J., "Governance for Broadened Accountability: Blending Deliberate and Emergent Strategizing", Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(2), pp.195~217 (2007)
- Orren, Gary., "Why People Don’t Trust Government", pp.1~18 (1997), Harvard University Press
- Ostrom, Elinor, "Trust and Rciprocity" (2003), Russell Sage
- Putnam, Robert. D., "Making Democracy Work" (1993), Princeton University Press
- Romzek, Barbara, "Accountability in the public sector : Lessons from the Challenger tragedy", Public Administration Review, 47(3), pp.227~238 (1987)
- Rosenbloom, David H., "Building a Legislative-Centered Public Administration : Congress and the Administrative State, 1946-1999" (2000), University of Alabama Press
- Ruscio, Kenneth P., "Trust and the Administrative State", Public Administration Review, 57(5), pp.454~458 (1997)
- Ruscio, K. P., "Jay’s pirouette or why political trust is not the same as personal trust", Administration & Society, 31, pp.639~657 (1999)
- Sayre, Wallace, "Classics of Public Administration" (1978), Moore
- Van de Walle, S., "Public service performance and trust in government: The problem of causality", International Journal of Public Administration, 26(8, pp.9) (2003), 891~914
- Wamsley, Gary, "The State of Public Bureaucracy", pp.59~86 (1992), M.E. Sharpe
- Weatherford, Stephen. M., "Measuring Political Legitimacy", American Political Science Review, 86(1), pp.149~166 (1992)
- West, William F., "Structuring Administrative Discretion : The Pursuit of Rationality and Responsiveness", American Journal of Political Science, 28(2), pp.340~360 (1984)
- Wilson, Woodrow., "The Study of Administration", Reprinted in Political Science Quarterly, 56(1941), pp.481~506 (1887)
- Yang, Kaifeng, "The performance-trust link : Implications for performance measurement", Public Administration Review, 66, pp.114~126 (2006)