본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

공적개발원조에 있어서 국가기여도 분석방법론 적용: 아제르바이잔 사례

Application of Contribution Analysis Method in Official Development Assistance Projects: The Case of Azerbaijan

0

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류행정학

초록

This paper theoretically reviews how the effects of ODA projects can be made in ODA recipient countries at country level, in particular, how the effects can be measured, and what methodologies can be employed, and attempts to apply the contribution analysis method in a recipient country, Azerbaijan, which is one of the Korea’s ODA priority countries. This paper also emphasizes the importance of System Dynamics Approach in applying the contribution analysis method in the sense that the approach can provide us with information related to inter-relationships among factors involved in the analysis process. The analysis results show that the effects of the ODA projects performed by Korean government in Azerbaijan have made some significant impacts on the governance sector, compared to other sectors, and also those effects can be measured as long as the contribution analysis method is properly and sensibly applied.

Abstract

This paper theoretically reviews how the effects of ODA projects can be made in ODA recipient countries at country level, in particular, how the effects can be measured, and what methodologies can be employed, and attempts to apply the contribution analysis method in a recipient country, Azerbaijan, which is one of the Korea’s ODA priority countries. This paper also emphasizes the importance of System Dynamics Approach in applying the contribution analysis method in the sense that the approach can provide us with information related to inter-relationships among factors involved in the analysis process. The analysis results show that the effects of the ODA projects performed by Korean government in Azerbaijan have made some significant impacts on the governance sector, compared to other sectors, and also those effects can be measured as long as the contribution analysis method is properly and sensibly applied.

참고문헌 (32)

  1. DEEP 프로그램 발전방안 연구, "곽재성", 한국국제협력단, ~ (2013)
  2. 국제개발협력위원회, "2019년 국제개발협력 종합시행계획", ~ (2019)
  3. KOICA 베트남국별지원전략 및 지원사업 평가결과보고서, "김상태", 한국국제협력단, ~ (2008)
  4. CPS 성과관리를 위한 국별평가방안 연구 : 시범국-파라과이, "이태주", 한국국제협력단, ~ (2012)
  5. 이현주, "ODA사업 평가 참여 전문가의 경험에 관한 연구", 사회적경제와 정책연구, 7(3), pp.169~201 (2017), 국제개발연구소[DOI]
  6. 장지현, "시스템다이내믹스를 활용한 사회적 기업 지속가능성 시나리오 분석", 사회적경제와 정책연구, 7(1), pp.63~86 (2017), 국제개발연구소[DOI]
  7. 장지현, "저개발국가에 대한 공적개발원조(ODA) 연구경향분석", 사회적경제와 정책연구, 9(1), pp.121~146 (2019), 국제개발연구소[DOI]
  8. ODA 국별 성과관리체제 및 평가방법에 관한 연구, "정지선", KIPE 대외경제정책연구원, ~ (2013)
  9. 최영출, "OECD 국가들의 ODA 효과성 영향 결합조건 분석: QCA분석 방법의 적용", 한국비교정부학보, 22(3), pp.1~20 (2018), 한국비교정부학회[DOI]
  10. 최영출, "ODA 사업추진의 효과성 강화를 위한 정책 시뮬레이션: 시스템다이내믹스 방법론의 적용", 한국자치행정학보, 31(3), pp.25~52 (2017), 한국자치행정학회[DOI]
  11. 최영출, "사회적기업의 지속가능성에 미치는 영향요인: QCA 방법의 적용", 한국비교정부학보, 19(1), pp.157~178 (2015), 한국비교정부학회[DOI]
  12. 한국국제협력단, "개발협력 프로그램 평가의 설계와 집행" (2009), 한울
  13. "Quality of ODA Effectiveness" (2018)[URL]
  14. Delahais, T., "Applying contribution analysis: Lessons from five years of practice", Evaluation, 18(3), pp.281~293 (2012)
  15. Funnell, S., "Purposeful program theory: Effective use of theories of change and logic models" (2011), Jossey Bass
  16. Hummelbrunner, R., "Beyond Logframe; Using Systems Concepts in Evaluation. Issues and Prospects of Evaluations for International Development- Series IV" (2010), FASID
  17. Hussain, M., "Lessons learnt from implementation of the DFID Results Framework", DFID, ~ (2013)
  18. Evaluation of Countryf Strategy Paper 2007-2010, "Irish Aid", ~ (2011)
  19. Evaluation of the Irish Aid Ethiopia Country Strategy 2008-2012: Contribution of a results-based management approach to strategy development, "ITAD", ~ (2012)
  20. Jones. H., "Promoting evidence-based decision-making in development agencies. Background Note", Overseas Development Institute, ~ (2012)
  21. Strengthening learning from research and evaluation: going with the grain. Report to IACDI, "Jones, H.", Overseas Development Institute, ~ (2010)
  22. Leeuw, FL. L., "Linking theory-based evaluation and contribution analysis: Three problems and a few solutions", Evaluation, 18(3), pp.348~363 (2012)
  23. Mayne, J., "Assessing attribution through contribution analysis: Using performance measures sensibly", Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 16(1) (2001)
  24. Mayne, J., "Contribution analysis: Coming of age", Evaluation, 18(3), pp.270~280 (2002)
  25. Contribution analysis: An approach to exploring cause and effect, "Mayne. J.", ~, pp.ILAC(Institutional Learning and Change) Brief 16 (2008)
  26. Methods and Procedures in Aid Evalvation, "OECD", DAC Expert Group on Aid Evaluation. OECD, ~ (1986)
  27. OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews Korea 2018, "OECD", OECD, ~ (2018)
  28. Picciotto. R., "Country-led monitoring and evaluation systems: Better evidence, better policies, better development results", pp.32~ (2009), UNICEF
  29. Reflective Literature Review of Contribution Analysis, "Rankin, Stocks", IRISS, ~ (2014)
  30. Riddell, "Foreign Aid Reconsidered" (1987), Johns Hopkins University Press
  31. Rogers, P., "Theory-based evaluations: Reflections ten years on", New Directors for Evaluation, 114, pp.63~67 (2007)
  32. Shadish, William R., "Foundations of Program Evaluation: Theories of Practice" (1991), Sage Publications

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)