증거기반 정책결정과 재정정보의 생산, 배포, 활용
Evidence-based Policy Making and Dissemination and the Creation and Use of Fiscal Information
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
(Purpose) In recent years, the use of big data has spread beyond the private sector to government. As a result, evidence-based policy making is frequently cited. However, the fiscal information used as evidence in policy making focuses on use while largely ignoring the importance of its creation. The use of information is important in evidence-based policy making, but the creation of fiscal information with consistent security protocols is infinitely more important. This context represents the fundamental perspective of this study. (Design/Approach) This study argues that the creation of information with guaranteed integrity is paramount, and that the use of such information should follow as the next priority. The premise of using secure information, which is the raw data of policy making, should be to produce data that guarantees accuracy and consistency, and yet governments largely ignore the importance of informational integrity. In order to overcome these limitations, policy models are used to explore alternatives such as priorities. (Findings and Research Implications) Those factors that will be considered in the creation of secure fiscal information produced with integrity are as follows. First, legislative measures are needed to guide evidence-based policy making. Second, reliable information should automatically be produced when the financial management information system is properly reorganized. Additionally, time-series scaling of the information is necessary. Third, there is an urgent need to change the perception of information creation. Fourth, the roles of the auditor and the Ministry of Economy and Finance (MOEF) should be strengthened. The role of a Board of Audit and Inspection (BAI), such as the GAO in the United States, is needed, and it is also necessary to consider the establishment of an ‘IT dashboard’ to systematically manage the fragmented financial management information system and regulate various matters, such as system construction and reorganization.
Abstract
(Purpose) In recent years, the use of big data has spread beyond the private sector to government. As a result, evidence-based policy making is frequently cited. However, the fiscal information used as evidence in policy making focuses on use while largely ignoring the importance of its creation. The use of information is important in evidence-based policy making, but the creation of fiscal information with consistent security protocols is infinitely more important. This context represents the fundamental perspective of this study. (Design/Approach) This study argues that the creation of information with guaranteed integrity is paramount, and that the use of such information should follow as the next priority. The premise of using secure information, which is the raw data of policy making, should be to produce data that guarantees accuracy and consistency, and yet governments largely ignore the importance of informational integrity. In order to overcome these limitations, policy models are used to explore alternatives such as priorities. (Findings and Research Implications) Those factors that will be considered in the creation of secure fiscal information produced with integrity are as follows. First, legislative measures are needed to guide evidence-based policy making. Second, reliable information should automatically be produced when the financial management information system is properly reorganized. Additionally, time-series scaling of the information is necessary. Third, there is an urgent need to change the perception of information creation. Fourth, the roles of the auditor and the Ministry of Economy and Finance (MOEF) should be strengthened. The role of a Board of Audit and Inspection (BAI), such as the GAO in the United States, is needed, and it is also necessary to consider the establishment of an ‘IT dashboard’ to systematically manage the fragmented financial management information system and regulate various matters, such as system construction and reorganization.
참고문헌 (21)
- Etzioni, A., "The Active Society" (1968), The Free Press
- Head, B., "Evidence-based policy: principles and requirements", Strengthening evidence-based policy in the Australian Federation, 1, pp.13~26 (2010)
- Jeong, S. H., "Evidence-based policy making and performance-oriented budget", Monthly Public Finance Information, ~ (2019)
- Jeong, S. H., "Local finance, is it good ?" (2020), Haenam
- Jeong, S. H., "Fiscal reform in South Korea: looking back and moving forward", Public Money & Management, 39(6), pp.450~453 (2019)
- Kim, Daejung, "Consideration of the use of policy evidence", KAPA proceeding, pp.875~896 (2014)
- Lee, H. S., "The analysis of the connectivity between national R&D performance evaluation results and budget allocation", Master, pp.2012
- Lee, M. A. ., "Predicting government employees’ turnover intention factors using a decision tree approach", Master, pp.2020
- "Local Finance 365"[URL]
- Toward next-generation performance budgeting: Lessons from the experiences of seven reforming countries, "Moynihan, D.", The World Bank, ~ (2016)
- 오철호, "정책결정, 증거 그리고 활용 - 연구경향과 제언 -", 한국정책학회보, 24(1), pp.53~76 (2015), 한국정책학회
- Pew-MacArthur Results First Initiative, "Evidence-based policymaking A guide for effective government", The Pew charitable Trusts, ~ (2014)
- Sanderson, I., "Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making", Public Administration, 80(1), pp.1~22 (2002)
- Seoul, "FY 2017 Seoul financial statement", ~ (2018)
- Turner, M. A., "Evidence-Based Policymaking Requires A Portfolio of Tools", Testimony Submitted for the Record to the Subcommittee on Human Resources Committee on Ways and Means United States House of Representatives, ~ (2013)
- U.K., Cabinet Office Team, Strategic Policy Making, "Professional policy making for the twenty first century", Cabinet Office, ~ (1999)
- U.S., "Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act of 2018 115th Congress (2017-2018)", ~ (2019)
- Annual Report: Additional Opportunities to Reduce Fragmentation, Overlap, and Duplication and Achieve Billions in Financial Benefits, "U.S.", ~ (2019)
- "IT dashboard"[URL]
- U.S., "Overview of Federal Evidence-Building Efforts 2016", ~ (2016)
- 유종성, "증거기반 정책연구를 위한 행정자료의 활용", 한국사회정책, 27(1), pp.5~37 (2020), 한국사회정책학회[DOI]