OECD 국가들의 ODA 효과성 영향 결합조건 분석: QCA분석 방법의 적용
Identifying the Combinations of the Variables Affecting ODA Effectiveness in OECD Countries: Application of QCA
0
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Since Korea became a member of OECD DAC member countries in 2010, Korean government has been increasing the size of ODA over time to a significant degree to which it has reached 0.16% of GNI (Gross National Income) and three thousand billion Korean won (Korean currency), which is equivalent to approximately 3 billion US dollars as of 2018. It is expected that this tendency of increase in ODA size also continues to go on worldwide as OECD DAC has highly recommended each DAC member country to increase its ODA size to 0.7 % of GNI, respectively. Against this background, based on the assumption that ODA projects should be effectively formulated, implemented, monitored and evaluated from the beginning to end, this paper attempts to discover the combinations of the configurations associated with the effective management of ODA projects in OECD DAC member countries, with special reference to policy-related variables, and to put forward policy implications for Korea to be able to ameliorate the existing ODA policy governance. The research methodology employed in this analysis is QCA (Qualitative Comparative Analysis). One of the main findings in this analysis is that ODA projects can be effectively implemented in a situation where high level of efficiency in government spending, a high level of transparency in policy-making system, and low-level of public funds diversion are ensured.
Abstract
Since Korea became a member of OECD DAC member countries in 2010, Korean government has been increasing the size of ODA over time to a significant degree to which it has reached 0.16% of GNI (Gross National Income) and three thousand billion Korean won (Korean currency), which is equivalent to approximately 3 billion US dollars as of 2018. It is expected that this tendency of increase in ODA size also continues to go on worldwide as OECD DAC has highly recommended each DAC member country to increase its ODA size to 0.7 % of GNI, respectively. Against this background, based on the assumption that ODA projects should be effectively formulated, implemented, monitored and evaluated from the beginning to end, this paper attempts to discover the combinations of the configurations associated with the effective management of ODA projects in OECD DAC member countries, with special reference to policy-related variables, and to put forward policy implications for Korea to be able to ameliorate the existing ODA policy governance. The research methodology employed in this analysis is QCA (Qualitative Comparative Analysis). One of the main findings in this analysis is that ODA projects can be effectively implemented in a situation where high level of efficiency in government spending, a high level of transparency in policy-making system, and low-level of public funds diversion are ensured.
참고문헌 (37)
- 고경민, "공적개발원조(ODA)와 국익: 한국 ODA 정책의 발전을 위한 함의", 한국과 국제정치, 26(3), pp.95~128 (2010), 극동문제연구소[DOI]
- 고주현, "한국 ODA와 수원국 거버넌스: 수원국 부패에 따른 원조 변용성을 중심으로", 한국부패학회보, 19(3), pp.87~110 (2014), 한국부패학회
- 기영화, "사회적경제 차원의 사회적기업과 기업의 사회적 책임의 비교연구", 사회적경제와 정책연구, 7(3), pp.79~108 (2017), 국제개발연구소[DOI]
- 김석우, "ODA 정책의 국내 요인: 국내 복지정책과 ODA 정책", 한국정치학회보, 50(1), pp.133~154 (2016), 한국정치학회[DOI]
- 김학실, "효과적인 ODA 사업 추진을 위한 수원국 유형화와 정책적 연계", 한국비교정부학보, 21(2), pp.21~42 (2017), 한국비교정부학회[DOI]
- 서동희, "국가경쟁력 확보를 위한 이민자 통합정책", 사회적경제와 정책연구, 7(1), pp.87~113 (2017), 국제개발연구소[DOI]
- 송효진, "ODA 개발효과 제고를 위한 강화조건으로서의 거버넌스: 아프리카 정보화지원을 중심으로", 평화학연구, 16(4), pp.35~60 (2015), 사단법인 한국평화연구학회[DOI]
- 윤수재, "ODA사업 평가 및 모니터링 시스템과 성과 간의 관계 분석", 한국공공관리학보, 30(4), pp.113~138 (2016), 한국공공관리학회[DOI]
- 이남국, "공적개발원조(ODA)사업의 평가: 개발도상국 과학기술지원사업을 중심으로", 한국비교정부학보, 16(3), pp.209~234 (2012), 한국비교정부학회[DOI]
- 이현주, "ODA사업 평가 참여 전문가의 경험에 관한 연구", 사회적경제와 정책연구, 7(3), pp.169~201 (2017), 국제개발연구소[DOI]
- 장지현, "시스템다이내믹스를 활용한 사회적 기업 지속가능성 시나리오 분석", 사회적경제와 정책연구, 7(1), pp.63~86 (2017), 국제개발연구소[DOI]
- 장지현, "교육 ODA사업의 효율성 강화방안: 시스템사고적 접근", 예술인문사회 융합 멀티미디어 논문지, 8(8), pp.363~372 (2018), 사단법인 인문사회과학기술융합학회[DOI]
- 지성태, "ODA 관점에서 본 새마을운동의 범분야(Cross-Cutting) 이슈에 관한 연구: 부녀회 운영과 산림녹화를 중심으로", 한국지역개발학회지, 28(4), pp.63~86 (2016), 한국지역개발학회
- 최영출, "사회정책적 요인이 국민행복도와 국가경쟁력에 미치는 영향요인 분석- OECD를 중심으로 -", 한국비교정부학보, 18(1), pp.1~22 (2014), 한국비교정부학회[DOI]
- 최영출, "사회적기업의 지속가능성에 미치는 영향요인: QCA 방법의 적용", 한국비교정부학보, 19(1), pp.157~178 (2015), 한국비교정부학회[DOI]
- 최영출, "ODA 사업추진의 효과성 강화를 위한 정책 시뮬레이션: 시스템다이내믹스 방법론의 적용", 한국자치행정학보, 31(3), pp.25~52 (2017), 한국자치행정학회[DOI]
- 홍성걸, "OECD DAC 성과평가기준을 이용한 ODA 평가: 한·베 산업기술학교 사례", 비교경제연구, 19(1), pp.101~149 (2012), 한국비교경제학회[DOI]
- Barry, J., "Democracy promotion and ODA", Contemporary Politics, 18(3), pp.303~324 (2012)
- CGD, "The Quality of Official Development Assistance(QuODA)" (2014), Center for Global Development
- CGD, "The Committment to Development Index", Center for Global Development, ~ (2018)
- Das, K., "Official Development Assistance of Japan : between the flawed structure", The Clarion, 2(2), pp.53~58 (2013)
- 함우식, "Directions of Regional Cooperation through Grafting Saemaul Undong in Construction of Power Plants in Developing Countries", 한국자치행정학보, 28(2), pp.45~62 (2014), 한국자치행정학회[DOI]
- Helliwell, J. F., "How’s your government? International evidence linking good government and well-being", British Journal of Political Science, 38(4), pp.595~619 (2008)
- Holmberg, S., "Quality of government : What you get", Annual Review of Political Science, 12, pp.135~161 (2009)
- The Evolution of Official Development Assistance: Achievements, Criticism and a Way Forward, "Hynes, W.", OECD Publishing, ~, pp.OECD Development Cooperation Working Papers, No. 12 (2013)
- Kaufmann, D., "The worldwide governance indicators. Methodology and analytical issues" (2010), World Bank
- Kurtz, M. J., "Growth and governance : Models, measures and mechanisms", Journal of Politics, 69(2), pp.538~554 (2007)
- Magalhaes, P., "Government effectiveness and support for democracy", European Journal of Poltical Search, 53, pp.77~97 (2014)
- OECD, "Principles for Evaluation of Development Assistance" (1991), OECD
- OECD, "The DAC 50 Years, 50 Highlights" (2010), OECD
- OECD, "The DAC 50 Years, 50 Highlights" (2012), OECD
- OECD, "OECD Development Co-operation Peer Reviews : Australia 2018" (2018), OECD
- Rodrik, D., "Governance, growth and development decision-making" (2008), World Bank
- Tuman, J., "The Determinants of Japanese Official Development Assistance in Africa", International Interactions, 30, pp.45~57 (2004)
- Watanabe, T., "How Should Japanese ODA be Viewed? The Importance of Support for Self-Help Efforts", Asia-Pasific Review, 31(2), pp.17~26 (2006)
- "World Bank"[URL]
- Yasin, M., "Official development assistance and foreign direct investment flows to Sub‐Saharan Africa", African Development Review, 17(1), pp.23~40 (2005)