A Study on Chinese Common Prosperity Policy Discourse : 2-mode Network Analysis and Core-periphery Analysis Approach
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
(Purpose) This study aims to analyze the discourse surrounding China's Common Prosperity policy, with a focus on identifying the key actors, their roles, and the main keywords driving the discourse. The research seeks to understand the political, economic, and social implications of the policy and how it is being implemented at both central and local levels. (Design/methodology/approach) The study employs a data-driven approach, collecting discourse data related to China's Common Prosperity from online channels such as Baidu, CNKI, and People's Daily. The data spans from 2001 to May 2024. Using Python algorithms for web scraping, the data was processed by removing duplicates and stopwords, followed by morphological analysis and POS tagging to classify nouns and adjectives. The research follows a three-step procedure: deriving centrality and extracting the top 200 words, constructing a 2-mode matrix based on co-occurrence, and performing network analysis and core-periphery analysis to identify the structural relationships between actors and keywords. (Findings) The network analysis revealed that the Communist Party holds the most significant position in the Common Prosperity discourse, followed by government agencies, local governments, and enterprises. Core-periphery analysis highlighted the role of local governments as crucial implementers of the policy, with a strong connection to keywords such as "livelihood," "policy," and "middle class cultivation." Key keywords identified in the discourse included "great progress," "industry," "new era," "consumption," "economy," and "high-quality development." These findings suggest that China's Common Prosperity policy is being pursued through modern and innovative methods, with a focus on economic efficiency, social fairness, and reducing income disparities. (Research implications or Originality) This study contributes to the understanding of the structural characteristics of China's Common Prosperity policy discourse, emphasizing the coordinated efforts of central and local governments, the role of enterprises, and the integration of economic and social goals. The research provides important data for analyzing the influence of the Communist Party in policy-making and highlights the need for tailored regional policies. Additionally, it promotes further academic discussion on how technological innovation and sustainable development are integrated into social policies, offering a comparative perspective with advanced Northern European welfare states. Future research should enhance the reliability of data sources and utilize a broader variety of channels to deepen the analysis.
Abstract
(Purpose) This study aims to analyze the discourse surrounding China's Common Prosperity policy, with a focus on identifying the key actors, their roles, and the main keywords driving the discourse. The research seeks to understand the political, economic, and social implications of the policy and how it is being implemented at both central and local levels. (Design/methodology/approach) The study employs a data-driven approach, collecting discourse data related to China's Common Prosperity from online channels such as Baidu, CNKI, and People's Daily. The data spans from 2001 to May 2024. Using Python algorithms for web scraping, the data was processed by removing duplicates and stopwords, followed by morphological analysis and POS tagging to classify nouns and adjectives. The research follows a three-step procedure: deriving centrality and extracting the top 200 words, constructing a 2-mode matrix based on co-occurrence, and performing network analysis and core-periphery analysis to identify the structural relationships between actors and keywords. (Findings) The network analysis revealed that the Communist Party holds the most significant position in the Common Prosperity discourse, followed by government agencies, local governments, and enterprises. Core-periphery analysis highlighted the role of local governments as crucial implementers of the policy, with a strong connection to keywords such as "livelihood," "policy," and "middle class cultivation." Key keywords identified in the discourse included "great progress," "industry," "new era," "consumption," "economy," and "high-quality development." These findings suggest that China's Common Prosperity policy is being pursued through modern and innovative methods, with a focus on economic efficiency, social fairness, and reducing income disparities. (Research implications or Originality) This study contributes to the understanding of the structural characteristics of China's Common Prosperity policy discourse, emphasizing the coordinated efforts of central and local governments, the role of enterprises, and the integration of economic and social goals. The research provides important data for analyzing the influence of the Communist Party in policy-making and highlights the need for tailored regional policies. Additionally, it promotes further academic discussion on how technological innovation and sustainable development are integrated into social policies, offering a comparative perspective with advanced Northern European welfare states. Future research should enhance the reliability of data sources and utilize a broader variety of channels to deepen the analysis.
참고문헌 (26)
- Akkemik, K. A., "Rapid economic growth and its sustainability in China", Perceptions : Journal of International Affairs, 20(1), pp.133~158 (2015)
- Chen, L., "Does the development of the digital economy promote common prosperity?—Analysis based on 284 cities in China", Sustainability, 15(5), pp.4688~ (2023)
- Chen, L., "Does the development of the digital economy promote common prosperity?—Analysis based on 284 cities in China", Sustainability, 15(5), pp.4688~ (2023)
- Dunford, M., "The Chinese path to common prosperity", International Critical Thought, 12(1), pp.35~54 (2022)
- "Assessing Chinas common prosperity campaign" (2021)[URL]
- Hu, L., "The integration between and common prosperity of government and market : China's experience of economic development", China Political Economy, 3(2), pp.289~302 (2020)
- Jiang, F., "Effects of rural collective economy policy on the common prosperity in China : based on the mediating effect of farmland transfer", Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, pp.1302545~ (2023)
- Kakwani, N., "Growth and common prosperity in China", China & World Economy, 30(1), pp.28~57 (2022)
- Li, S., "Understanding China’s road to common prosperity : Background, definition and path", China Economic Journal, 16(1), pp.1~13 (2023)
- Liu, K., "China's reform spree in 2021 : Common prosperity and others", Economic Papers : A journal of applied economics and policy, 41(3), pp.232~246 (2022)
- Liu, Y., "Pathway to prosperity? The impact of low-carbon energy transition on China's common prosperity", Energy Economics, 124, pp.106819~ (2023)
- Liu, Y., "Digital economy and China’s path to common prosperity", Digital Economy and Sustainable Development, 2(1), pp.8~ (2024)
- Lu, Y., "An Exploratory Study on China’s Green Consumption Discourse : Focusing on Text Mining and Sentiment Analysis", Journal of Distribution and Management Research, 26(2), pp.67~84 (2023)
- Ma, X., "Evaluating China’s Common Prosperity Policies against the Background of Green Development by Using the PMC Model", Sustainability, 15(10), pp.7870~ (2023)
- Qiao, X., "Common Prosperity and Reshaping China’s Economic Cycle : Theoretical Logic and Empirical Evidence from a Political Economic Perspective", China Finance and Economic Review, 12(3), pp.3~24 (2023)
- Rose, J. L., "On the value of economic growth", Politics, Philosophy & Economics, 19(2), pp.128~153 (2020)
- Sha, Z., "Agricultural subsidies on common prosperity : Evidence from the Chinese social survey", International Review of Economics & Finance, 91, pp.1~18 (2024)
- Su, Y., "Economic poverty, common prosperity, and underdog entrepreneurship", Journal of Business Research, 165, pp.114061~ (2023)
- Sun, H., "Coordination of Income Distribution System and Promotion of Common Prosperity Path", China Finance and Economic Review, 11(4), pp.23~43 (2022)
- Decoding China’s “Common Prosperity” drive. LSE IDEAS Strategic Update, "Sun, X.", LSE IDEAS, ~ (2022)
- Székely-Doby, A., "The Chinese developmental state : Threats, challenges, and prospects", Issues & Studies, 56(04), pp.2050002~ (2020)
- China’s common prosperity program: causes, challenges, and implications, "Wu, G.", The Asia Society Policy Institute, ~, pp.2022-03 (2022)
- Xinyi, L., "Digital inclusive finance and common prosperity : theoretical mechanisms and empirical facts", Research in Financial Economics, (23), pp.1~15 (2022)
- Yang, B., "A Study on the diffusion of China's carbon neutrality policy discourse and Korea's strategic response", China Studies, (77), pp.189~212 (2023)
- Zhang, T., "The role of innovation and entrepreneurship in promoting common prosperity in China: Empirical evidence from a two-way fixed effects model", Plos One, 18(12), pp.e0295752~ (2023)
- Zhao, X., "Regional common prosperity level and its spatial relationship with carbon emission intensity in China", Scientific Reports, 13(1), pp.17035~ (2023)