보호복 관련 국내·외 표준에 대한 탐색적 조사 - ISO, ASTM, CEN, KS를 중심으로 -
An Exploratory Study on Domestic and International Protective Clothing Standard- Focused on ISO, ASTM, CEN, KS-
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
When designing protective clothing, there are something to be considered such as physiological feature ofhuman body, acting range not to restrict physical activity, and effectiveness of material. Because the primary objective ofprotective clothing is to protect human body from danger and it is designed through complex designing process not likelygeneral clothing design. However, curent evaluation techniques-such as the ISO, the ASTM and the CEN, and KS- pro-vide only the standard to evaluate the primary feature of material (testing, performance requirements, material spec-ification, selection and application, test and care, and so on). There are no standard to evaluate influence for the humanbody while protective clothing put on. Especially, in Korea, there is KS to evaluate protective clothing, but it is partiallyit is new competitive means in the time of Global Standards and they are competing to make their own standard to globalstandard for the protective clothing. Therefore, it can be great opportunity for Korean clothing and textile industry to revi-talize if focusing on research and development for protective clothing design based on physical activity of human body, fitevaluation technique and sizing which is curently no global standard for it and developing our standard to global standard.
Abstract
When designing protective clothing, there are something to be considered such as physiological feature ofhuman body, acting range not to restrict physical activity, and effectiveness of material. Because the primary objective ofprotective clothing is to protect human body from danger and it is designed through complex designing process not likelygeneral clothing design. However, curent evaluation techniques-such as the ISO, the ASTM and the CEN, and KS- pro-vide only the standard to evaluate the primary feature of material (testing, performance requirements, material spec-ification, selection and application, test and care, and so on). There are no standard to evaluate influence for the humanbody while protective clothing put on. Especially, in Korea, there is KS to evaluate protective clothing, but it is partiallyit is new competitive means in the time of Global Standards and they are competing to make their own standard to globalstandard for the protective clothing. Therefore, it can be great opportunity for Korean clothing and textile industry to revi-talize if focusing on research and development for protective clothing design based on physical activity of human body, fitevaluation technique and sizing which is curently no global standard for it and developing our standard to global standard.
참고문헌 (14)
- 기술표준원, "2006 기술표준백서", ~ (2006)
- 송명견, "기능복" (1998), 수학사
- 이순원, "의복과 환경" (2002), 한국방송통신대학교 출판부
- 윤기종, "첨단 보호복 산업과 기술", 섬유기술과 산업, 10(4), pp.325~338 (2006)
- 정기수, "인체보호용 특수복", 섬유기술과 산업, 8(4), pp.421~431 (2004)
- 최정화, "철도 차량 정비 작업자의 부직포 보호 작업복 착용 실태에 관한 연구", 한국의류학회지, 28(8), pp.1165~1174 (2004), 한국의류학회
- 한국표준협회, "표준선진국의 표준화시스템", ~ (2004)
- 홍성애, "특수복 착용으로 인한 Heat Stress", 한국생활환경학회지, 7(1), pp.37~46 (2000)
- 홍성애, "특수 기능복 개발을 위한 국제 규격 적용과 평가", 한국생활환경학회지, 11(1), pp.1~14 (2004), 한국생활환경학회
- [URL]
- [URL]
- [URL]
- [URL]
- [URL]
