본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

민중문학의 주체와 노동자 수기

The Subject of Popular Literature and Labor's Handicrafts

0

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

In late 1970s, the mass literature has changed because of the rise of new literature according to the change of korea's social character. Because of drastic phenomenon of leaving the land and the industrialization, the factory worker produced in large quantities. As this overlap with intellectual literature, the memo and reportage that are based on experience of the worker themselves are joined. This has significant meaning that the subject of producing appears to the subject of literature, and also it is very important because it accelerates the subject debate of the race literature and play important role of the race literature. In late 1970s, pointing the limitation of degradation of the emotional intellectual literature, mass literature becomes the vitamin of the race literature. However, these literature are neglected completely in the history of contemporary literature and the frame of debating meaning and self-examination of the race literature. Therefore, In this writing the examination of the theory of race literature should be examined based on fine examination. Without the various creation of the mass, dealing with the theory of race literature is just reconfirming the defeatistic thought, is far from creative discourse and creation of the alternatives. In that meaning, the important problem of the theory of race literature is the problem of practicing subject, so I try to examine closely and clarify the result and limitation. The valuation of the theory of race literature at that time should begin at objective validity.

Abstract

In late 1970s, the mass literature has changed because of the rise of new literature according to the change of korea's social character. Because of drastic phenomenon of leaving the land and the industrialization, the factory worker produced in large quantities. As this overlap with intellectual literature, the memo and reportage that are based on experience of the worker themselves are joined. This has significant meaning that the subject of producing appears to the subject of literature, and also it is very important because it accelerates the subject debate of the race literature and play important role of the race literature. In late 1970s, pointing the limitation of degradation of the emotional intellectual literature, mass literature becomes the vitamin of the race literature. However, these literature are neglected completely in the history of contemporary literature and the frame of debating meaning and self-examination of the race literature. Therefore, In this writing the examination of the theory of race literature should be examined based on fine examination. Without the various creation of the mass, dealing with the theory of race literature is just reconfirming the defeatistic thought, is far from creative discourse and creation of the alternatives. In that meaning, the important problem of the theory of race literature is the problem of practicing subject, so I try to examine closely and clarify the result and limitation. The valuation of the theory of race literature at that time should begin at objective validity.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. 김금수, "문학과 노동운동", 현장문학, 1 (1988)
  2. 김명인, "희망의 문학" (1990), 풀빛
  3. 김병걸, "민족,민중 그리고 문학2" (1985), 지양사
  4. 김병걸, "민중,노동 그리고 문학3" (1985), 지양사
  5. 김사인, "민족민중문학론의 쟁점과 전망" (1989), 푸른숲
  6. 나보순, "우리들 가진 것 비록 적어도" (1983), 돌베개
  7. 석정남, "공장의 불빛" (1984), 일월서각
  8. 송효순, "서울로 가는 길" (1982), 형성사
  9. 신병현, "70년대 지배적인 담론구성체들과 노동자들의 글쓰기", 산업노동연구, 12(1), pp.191~222 (2006), 한국산업노동학회
  10. 유동우, "어느 돌맹이의 외침" (1978), 대화출판사
  11. 이성욱, "「소시민적 문학론의 탈락과 민족문학론의 분화」,『80년대 사회운동논쟁』" (1989), 한길사
  12. 이태호, "1970년대 노동운동의 궤적", 실천문학, 4 (1883), 실천문학사
  13. 장남수, "빼앗긴 일터" (1984), 창작과비평사
  14. 현준만, "「노동문학의 현재적 의미」,『한국문학의 현단계Ⅳ』" (1985), 창작과비평사

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)