본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Contextually Relevant Theodicies for Pastoral Care

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기독교신학

초록

This article is an attempt to construct contextually relevant theodicies for pastoral caretakers who have complex realities of suffering and evil. In a postmodern era, traditional theodicy cannot be contextually relevant or meaningful enough for complex human predicaments. Traditionally, theodicy has been constructed as a way of defending God. It has focused primarily on God's goodness and almighty power rather than the reality of human suffering and evil. God’s compassion has not been applied enough into constructing traditional theodicy. This article, based on the personal relationship between God and human beings, tries to focus mainly on exploring the reality of human predicaments, seeking constructing contextually relevant theodicies for practicing pastoral care. In the process of constructing a new theodicy, eventually the sufferer needs to have an experience of empathizing with God and God with the sufferer as well. For this experience, a deep and open questioning about our predicaments is required. Approaching the end of our journey of questioning we should experience the mutually communion of heart with heart in our personal relationship with God. Lastly, this article presents three steps to construct a contextually relevant theodicy for practicing pastoral care: 1) deeply questioning in human predicaments–completing the unfinished question, 2) empathizing with God–encountering God personally, and 3) constructing a new theodicy. Through our wholehearted and desperate questioning about suffering and resisting evil, we can start a journey of constructing a new theodicy. Pastoral caregivers need to elaborate and appropriate the process of constructing new theodicies in order to practice a contextually relevant pastoral care.

Abstract

This article is an attempt to construct contextually relevant theodicies for pastoral caretakers who have complex realities of suffering and evil. In a postmodern era, traditional theodicy cannot be contextually relevant or meaningful enough for complex human predicaments. Traditionally, theodicy has been constructed as a way of defending God. It has focused primarily on God's goodness and almighty power rather than the reality of human suffering and evil. God’s compassion has not been applied enough into constructing traditional theodicy. This article, based on the personal relationship between God and human beings, tries to focus mainly on exploring the reality of human predicaments, seeking constructing contextually relevant theodicies for practicing pastoral care. In the process of constructing a new theodicy, eventually the sufferer needs to have an experience of empathizing with God and God with the sufferer as well. For this experience, a deep and open questioning about our predicaments is required. Approaching the end of our journey of questioning we should experience the mutually communion of heart with heart in our personal relationship with God. Lastly, this article presents three steps to construct a contextually relevant theodicy for practicing pastoral care: 1) deeply questioning in human predicaments–completing the unfinished question, 2) empathizing with God–encountering God personally, and 3) constructing a new theodicy. Through our wholehearted and desperate questioning about suffering and resisting evil, we can start a journey of constructing a new theodicy. Pastoral caregivers need to elaborate and appropriate the process of constructing new theodicies in order to practice a contextually relevant pastoral care.

참고문헌 (8)

  1. John Knox Press, "Human Tragedy and Divine Compassion: A Contemporary Theodicy, In Westminster", pp.1990, Farley, Wendy
  2. Gunn, David M., "The Fate of King Saul: An Interpretation of a Biblical Story" (1980), JSOT Press
  3. Hwang, Hun Young, "Han, Shame and Anger: Self Psychological Approach to the Victims' Experience of Evil", Theology and Praxis, 3(Winter), pp.163~184 (2002)
  4. 권혁남, "Views on human freedom and suffering through the event of crucifixion - In relation to Karl Rahner’s understanding of death -", 신학과 실천, (29), pp.503~541 (2011), 한국실천신학회
  5. Park, Andrew Sung, "The Other Side of Sin: Woundedness from the Perspective of the Sinned-Against" (2001), State University of New York Press
  6. 박우영, "신앙공동체와 사회적 실천 가능성 - 라인홀드 니버와 베벌리 해리슨의 인간과 사회적 악 이해를 중심으로 -", 신학과 실천, (27), pp.429~460 (2011), 한국실천신학회
  7. Poling, James Newton, "Deliver Us From Evil: Resisting Racial and Gender Oppression" (1996), Fortress Press
  8. Sands, Kathleen M, "Escape from Paradise: Evil and Tragedy in Feminist Theology" (1994), Fortress Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (23건)