Ethical Introspection of Christianity for Overcoming Suicide Problem of Contemporary People - As a Problem of Responsibility Beyond Condemnation -
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, an issue was raised that existing interpretation and assessment on suicide has been approached by apprehending causa efficiens as a cause, and a suggestion was made that a discussion that suicide problems also should be approached in a way of discussion on causality with a method of "having made each mutually responsible" other than uniformed interpretation and assessment, because, 4 kinds of cause 1>material cause, 2>formal cause, 3>final cause and 4>efficient cause that Aristoteles raised based on Heidegger's discussion can be distinguished, but each being gathered into one total, that is, constitutes causality. The implication that this study raises through such way of approach reflects responsibility eventually placed jointly on each for the suicide problem. In other words, it is not a thing that belongs to anyone but a problem of attitude toward life that I-you-we are jointly indebted to other than the cause to be returned only to society. Therefore, it is necessary to live realizing that rapidly increasing suicide problem is eventually the joint responsibility placed on all of us and bearing responsible life rather than approaching to problem of suicide with repetition of condemnation like the assessment and disposition by church on suicide that has been repeatedly carried out within existing history. In addition, church is requested for an obligation to go through maintaining "life to be lead as steward of life" along with God by joining his fatigue duty for saving, maintaining and preserving life together with christians.
Abstract
In this study, an issue was raised that existing interpretation and assessment on suicide has been approached by apprehending causa efficiens as a cause, and a suggestion was made that a discussion that suicide problems also should be approached in a way of discussion on causality with a method of "having made each mutually responsible" other than uniformed interpretation and assessment, because, 4 kinds of cause 1>material cause, 2>formal cause, 3>final cause and 4>efficient cause that Aristoteles raised based on Heidegger's discussion can be distinguished, but each being gathered into one total, that is, constitutes causality. The implication that this study raises through such way of approach reflects responsibility eventually placed jointly on each for the suicide problem. In other words, it is not a thing that belongs to anyone but a problem of attitude toward life that I-you-we are jointly indebted to other than the cause to be returned only to society. Therefore, it is necessary to live realizing that rapidly increasing suicide problem is eventually the joint responsibility placed on all of us and bearing responsible life rather than approaching to problem of suicide with repetition of condemnation like the assessment and disposition by church on suicide that has been repeatedly carried out within existing history. In addition, church is requested for an obligation to go through maintaining "life to be lead as steward of life" along with God by joining his fatigue duty for saving, maintaining and preserving life together with christians.
참고문헌 (31)
- Aquinas, Thomas, "Fathers of the English Dominican Province" (2007), BiblioBazaar
- Aristotle, "Nicomachean Ethics", pp.2002, Focus Publishing
- Augustine, "N&PNF, 2" (1890), Christian Literature Publishing Company
- Baek, Inrib, "Suicide as Social Murder: Towards a Socioeconomic Structural Alternative to the Individual–Psychological Approach", Journal of Critical Social Policy, 44, pp.326~360 (2014)
- Barth, Karl, "Barth Brevier" (1966), EVZ
- Battin, Margaret Pabst, "Ethical Issues in Suicide" (1995), Prentice Hall
- Calvin, John, "Institutes of the Christian Religion" (1973), Eerdmans Pub. Co
- Childs, Brevard S, "The book of Exodus : a critical, theological commentary" (1974), Westminster Press
- 조성돈, "자살에 대한 사회학적 접근과 기독교회의 대응방안 - 30·40대 남성의 자살을 중점으로 -", 신학과 실천, (31), pp.343~362 (2012), 한국실천신학회[DOI]
- 최병학, "자살 & 살자: 기독교 시각에서 본 자살과 생명윤리", 윤리교육연구, (31), pp.65~92 (2013), 한국윤리교육학회
- Clemons, James T, "suicide and Christian Moral Judgement", Christian Century, 102(16), pp.466~469 (1985)
- Funamoto, Hiroki, "Bioethics and Dietrich Bonhoeffer", Kwansei Gakuin Sociology Department studies, 66, pp.35~43 (1992)
- Hamaguchi, Yoshitaka, "The Moral Of Suicide: Reexamination of Suicide in Catholic Moral Theology", Nanzan Journal of Theological Studies, 11, pp.69~127 (1988)
- 한승진, "자살을 부추기는 사회와 기독교 생명윤리", 인문학연구, (18), pp.201~238 (2010), 인문학연구원
- Heidegger, Martin, "Die Technik Und Die Kehre" (1962), Neske
- 전형준, "자살에 대한 목회 상담학적 대책", 복음과 상담, 22(2), pp.275~300 (2014), 한국복음주의상담학회
- Katsuo, Kinto, "Theology of Life and Ethics of Life", Religon Law, 15, pp.1~17 (1996)
- 김찬규, "기독교 영성과 정신건강의 관계성", 신학과 실천, (46), pp.191~212 (2015), 한국실천신학회
- Kim, Hyaungsun, "Die Technik bei Heidegger", Journal of the Daedong Philosophical Association, 11, pp.79~102 (2000)
- 김교성, "사회적 타살과 소득 불평등", 비판사회정책, (44), pp.278~325 (2014), 비판과대안을위한사회복지학회[DOI]
- 권혁남, "기독교 생명윤리에 관한 윤리적 판단의 원리", 신학과 실천, (49), pp.661~682 (2016), 한국실천신학회
- 이덕중, "철학에 있어서의 αἰτία 이해", 철학논총, 3(53), pp.181~199 (2008), 새한철학회
- 이은규, "기독청소년 자살예방에 대한 고찰", 신학과 실천, (23), pp.259~285 (2010), 한국실천신학회
- 이종원, "자살의 윤리적 문제", 기독교사회윤리, (21), pp.103~132 (2011), 한국기독교사회윤리학회
- Murray, Alexander, "Suicide in the Middle Ages: Volume 2: The Curse on Self-Murder" (2000), Oxford University Press
- 오윤선, "청소년 자살 예방을 위한 기독교 위기상담", 복음과 상담, 12, pp.147~173 (2009), 한국복음주의상담학회
- 박미라, "상담에서 청소년자살사후개입 연구", 신학과 실천, (42), pp.357~378 (2014), 한국실천신학회
- 박미라, "위기집단상담 사례연구 - 서울의 A고등학교의 자살사후 개입 -", 신학과 실천, (44), pp.203~227 (2015), 한국실천신학회
- 신원하, "자살과 구원의 관계에 대한 신학적 분석과 목회윤리적 성찰", 기독교사회윤리, (23), pp.187~220 (2012), 한국기독교사회윤리학회[DOI]
- 위형윤, "책임사회 속에서 차별에 대한 인권실현에 관한 연구", 신학과 실천, (41), pp.207~242 (2014), 한국실천신학회
- YTN NEWS, "'Society that one person disappears per 40 minutes' … Soundless disaster 'suicide'", ~ (2016)