본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

An Investigation of the Relationship between Theology of Preaching and Homiletical Methods in the Cases of Fred B. Craddock and Paul Scott Wilson

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기독교신학

초록

As a theologian of the church, a preacher should theologically be aware of what happens in her/his preaching, that is, theology of preaching. Whether the preacher has her/his own theological reflection of her/his preaching is quite significant because how she/he theologically defines her/his preaching provides her/him a theological framework or a theological viewpoint which determines entire preaching process from exegesis to sermon deliverance, not least a homiletical method. In that sense, the main purpose of this paper is to investigate how one’s theology of preaching facilitates homiletical methods. For that end, Fred B. Craddock and Paul Scott Wilson would be the main dialogue partners to deal with how their theologies of preaching are related to their homiletical methods: Inductive preaching and four page sermon. This research would be arguing that both Craddock and Wilson are much interested in preaching as an event, but their theology of preaching and homiletical methods are quite different from each other. This difference is originated by some theories which influence their formation of theology of preaching. Whereas Craddock much relies on the New Hermeneutic which underscores performative dimension of language, Wilson is motivated by theology of Karl Barth who centers God in preaching. As a result, although Craddock and Wilson both consider preaching as an event, in Craddock’s view an event is explained in human terms while Wilson’s view sees an event from God’s terms. Finally, this paper suggests that both scholars’ works have their own merits. Their methods have been developed from their own homiletical theologies and struggles. We, therefore, cannot say which one is right or wrong. Rather, we should choose one of them or sometimes use both in complementary way according to our preaching situations since for preaching we neither lose God as the initiator of our preaching nor forget the hearers as the recipients and active participants of our preaching. Thus, a preacher should first of all exegete her/his own congregation and, then, choose a proper method. Also, she/he has to have her/his own explanation of preaching in theological terms.

Abstract

As a theologian of the church, a preacher should theologically be aware of what happens in her/his preaching, that is, theology of preaching. Whether the preacher has her/his own theological reflection of her/his preaching is quite significant because how she/he theologically defines her/his preaching provides her/him a theological framework or a theological viewpoint which determines entire preaching process from exegesis to sermon deliverance, not least a homiletical method. In that sense, the main purpose of this paper is to investigate how one’s theology of preaching facilitates homiletical methods. For that end, Fred B. Craddock and Paul Scott Wilson would be the main dialogue partners to deal with how their theologies of preaching are related to their homiletical methods: Inductive preaching and four page sermon. This research would be arguing that both Craddock and Wilson are much interested in preaching as an event, but their theology of preaching and homiletical methods are quite different from each other. This difference is originated by some theories which influence their formation of theology of preaching. Whereas Craddock much relies on the New Hermeneutic which underscores performative dimension of language, Wilson is motivated by theology of Karl Barth who centers God in preaching. As a result, although Craddock and Wilson both consider preaching as an event, in Craddock’s view an event is explained in human terms while Wilson’s view sees an event from God’s terms. Finally, this paper suggests that both scholars’ works have their own merits. Their methods have been developed from their own homiletical theologies and struggles. We, therefore, cannot say which one is right or wrong. Rather, we should choose one of them or sometimes use both in complementary way according to our preaching situations since for preaching we neither lose God as the initiator of our preaching nor forget the hearers as the recipients and active participants of our preaching. Thus, a preacher should first of all exegete her/his own congregation and, then, choose a proper method. Also, she/he has to have her/his own explanation of preaching in theological terms.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Achtemeier, Paul J, "An Introduction to the New Hermeneutic" (1969), The Westminster Press
  2. Barth, Karl, "Church Dogmatic Vol. 1" (1936), T &T Clark
  3. Bouman, Walter R., "Concise Encyclopedia of Preaching" (1995), Westminster John Knox Press
  4. Buttrick, David, "Homiletic : Moves and Structures" (1987), Fortress Press
  5. Campbell, Charles L., "Concise Encyclopedia of Preaching" (1995), Westminster John Knox Press
  6. Campbell, Charles L, "Preaching Jesus : New Directions for Homiletics in Han Frei’s Postliberal Theology" (1997), Eerdmans
  7. Choi, Jin-Bong, "A Study of the Appearance of a Post-New Homiletic", Theology and Praxis, 22, pp.175~208 (2010)
  8. Craddock, Fred B, "Preaching" (1985), Abingdon Press
  9. Choi, Jin-Bong, "As One without Authority" (1986), Abingdon Press
  10. Ebeling, Gerhard, "God and Word" (1967), Fortress Press
  11. Hwang, Byung-June, "A Study on Constructing a Plot Message Image Using Fred B. Craddock’s Inductive Preaching and Eugene Lowry’s Narrative Preaching", Theology and Praxis, 63, pp.127~155 (2019)
  12. Jeon, Chang-Hee, "A Study of Hans Frei’s Narrative Theology and the Development of the Narrative Homiletics", Theology and Praxis, 24, pp.177~208 (2010)
  13. Jeon, Chang-Hee, "Gerhard Ebeling’s Hermeneutical Influence on the New Homiletic", Theology and Praxis, 33, pp.67~93 (2012)
  14. Kay, James F, "Preaching and Theology" (2007), Chalice Press
  15. Kim, Wae-Sik, "Toward an Understanding of Fred. B. Craddock’s Inductive Preaching", Theology and Praxis, 5, pp.9~36 (2002)
  16. Lischer, Richard, "A Theology of Preaching: The Dynamics of the Gospel" (2001), Wipf and Stock Publishers
  17. Lose, David J, "360-Degree Preaching : Hearing, Speaking, and Living the Word" (2003), Baker Academic
  18. Reid, Robert Stephen, "The Four Voices of Preaching : Connecting Purpose and Identity behind the Pulpit" (2006), Brazos Press
  19. Reid, Robert Stephen, "Postmodernism and the Function of the New Homiletic in Post-Christendom Congregation", Homiletic, 20(2), pp.1~13 (1995)
  20. Wilson, Paul Scott, "Imagination of the Heart : New Understanding in Preaching" (1988), Abingdon Press
  21. Wilson, Paul Scott, "The Practice of Preaching" (1995), Abingdon Press
  22. Wilson, Paul Scott, "The Four Pages of the Sermon : A Guide to Biblical Preaching" (1999), Abingdon Press
  23. Wilson, Paul Scott, "Preaching and Homiletical Theory" (2004), Chalice Press
  24. Wilson, Paul Scott, "Purpose of Preaching" (2004), Chalice Press
  25. Wolterstorff, Nicholas, "Divine Discourse : Philosophical Reflections on the Claim that God Speaks" (1995), Cambridge University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)