Mary Wroth’s Constant Advice to Early Stuart Regime through her Veiled Political Text, Urania
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Mary Wroth casts Urania, who unmistakably speaks for the author as the title protagonist of Urania, in the role of a pragmatic counselor with the power of reason. Urania’s advice brings to mind Lipsius’s precepts of constancy. In early Stuart England, Lipsian constancy was sought in the place of English Parliament in order for MPs to preserve their right and duty as a counselor to the King. In this regard, Wroth’s use of the term constancy extends to the public discussion of civic virtue. Urania is initially regarded as an insignificant woman whose advice is not worth listening to. However, Urania proves that she is worthy as a reasonable and great counselor. By demonstrating that women are also eligible as an effective counselor, Wroth herself participates in the public discourse of Lipsian constancy and Tacitism. Wroth, who could not officially present petitions to the King, deployed her political advice within her Urania. In the midst of James’s prohibition on freedom of speech, Wroth implicitly criticizes the King’s misrule as she materializes the political fantasy on the stage of Urania through the representation of the idealized king. Wroth strategically veils her warnings against the royal misrule as she averts the attention of readers from her treatment of political matters by publicizing her private story, the scandal with William Herbert. By casting Herbert in the role of an idealized Emperor, Mary Wroth’s Constant Advice to Early Stuart Regime through her 83 Veiled Political Text, Urania Wroth brings to the fore the contrast between the pseudo-pacifist King James and the warlike Herbert. Furthermore, Wroth offers her own advice on the best form of government by representing a limited monarchy in Urania. Disguising herself as an ignorant woman to veil her serious political counsel, Wroth present Urania as her own version Petition of Rights to James.
Abstract
Mary Wroth casts Urania, who unmistakably speaks for the author as the title protagonist of Urania, in the role of a pragmatic counselor with the power of reason. Urania’s advice brings to mind Lipsius’s precepts of constancy. In early Stuart England, Lipsian constancy was sought in the place of English Parliament in order for MPs to preserve their right and duty as a counselor to the King. In this regard, Wroth’s use of the term constancy extends to the public discussion of civic virtue. Urania is initially regarded as an insignificant woman whose advice is not worth listening to. However, Urania proves that she is worthy as a reasonable and great counselor. By demonstrating that women are also eligible as an effective counselor, Wroth herself participates in the public discourse of Lipsian constancy and Tacitism. Wroth, who could not officially present petitions to the King, deployed her political advice within her Urania. In the midst of James’s prohibition on freedom of speech, Wroth implicitly criticizes the King’s misrule as she materializes the political fantasy on the stage of Urania through the representation of the idealized king. Wroth strategically veils her warnings against the royal misrule as she averts the attention of readers from her treatment of political matters by publicizing her private story, the scandal with William Herbert. By casting Herbert in the role of an idealized Emperor, Mary Wroth’s Constant Advice to Early Stuart Regime through her 83 Veiled Political Text, Urania Wroth brings to the fore the contrast between the pseudo-pacifist King James and the warlike Herbert. Furthermore, Wroth offers her own advice on the best form of government by representing a limited monarchy in Urania. Disguising herself as an ignorant woman to veil her serious political counsel, Wroth present Urania as her own version Petition of Rights to James.
참고문헌 (39)
- Andrea, Bernadette, "Pamphilia’s Cabinet: Gendered Authorship and Empire in Lady Mary Wroth’s Urania", ELH, 68(2), pp.335~358 (2001)
- Beilin, Elaine V., "Redeeming Eve: Women Writers of the English Renaissance" (1987), Princeton UP
- Braden, Gordon, "Seneca Tragedy and the Renaissance", Illinois Classical Studies, 9(2), pp.277~292 (1984)
- Brennan, Michael G., "Literary Patronage in the English Renaissance" (1988), Routledge
- Brennan, Michael G., "The Sidneys of Penshurst and the Monarchy, 1500-1700" (2006), Ashgate
- Colclough, David, "Freedom of Speech in Early Stuart England" (2009), Cambridge UP
- Dubrow, Heather, "Echoes of Desire: English Petrarchism and its Counterdiscourses" (1995), Cornell UP
- Farabaugh, Robin, "Ariadne, Venus, and the Labyrinth: Classical Sources and the Thread of Instruction in Mary Wroth’s Works", Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 96, pp.204~221 (1997)
- Gelderen, Martin van, "The Political Thought of the Dutch Revolt 1550-1590" (2002), Cambridge UP
- Hannay, Margaret P., "Mary Sidney, Lady Wroth" (2010), Ashgate
- "Speech in Parliament 28 June 1610"[URL]
- Hexter, J. H., "Power Struggle, Parliament, and Liberty in Early Stuart England", The Journal of Modern History, 50(1), pp.1~50 (1978)
- James I, "The Political Works of James I" (2006), Kessinger Publishing
- Lamb, Mary Ellen, "Gender and Authorship in the Sidney Circle" (1992), U of Wisconsin P
- 이진아, "메리 로쓰의『유래이니어』와 르네상스 스토아철학", 영어영문학, 57(5), pp.757~786 (2011), 한국영어영문학회[DOI]
- 이진아, "유스투스 립시우스의 『항심(恒心)에 대하여』에 나타난 신스토아주의", 고전 르네상스 영문학, 19(2), pp.5~26 (2010), 한국고전중세르네상스영문학회[DOI]
- Lewalski, Barbara Kiefer, "Writing Women in Jacobean England" (1993), Harvard UP
- Lipsius, Justus, "On Constancy" (2006), Phoenix P
- Machiavelli, Niccolo, "Discourses on Livy" (1998), U of Chicago P
- McCrea, Adriana, "Constant Minds: Political Virtue and the Lipsian Paradigm in England, 1584-1650" (1997), U of Toronto P
- McKeon, Michael, "The Age of Cultural Revolutions", pp.171~189 (2002), U of California P
- Mellor, Ronald, "Tacitus, Academic Politics, and Regicide in the Reign of Charles I: The Tragedy of Dr. Isaac Dorislaus", International Journal of the Classical Tradition, 11(2), pp.153~193 (2004)
- Miller, Naomi J., "‘Not Much to Be Marked’: Narrative of the Woman’s Part in Lady Mary Wroth’s Urania", Studies in English Literature, 1500-1900, 29(1), pp.121~137 (1989)
- Nichols, John, "The Progresses, Processions, and Magnificent Festivities, of King James the First. Vol. 1" (1828), J. B. Nichols
- Norbrook, David, "Writing the English Republic: Poetry, Rhetoric, and Politics, 1627-1660" (2000), Cambridge UP
- Oestreich, Gerhard, "Neostoicism and the Early Modern State" (1981), Cambridge UP
- Pocock, J. G. A., "The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition" (1975), Princeton UP
- Quilligan, Maureen, "Incest and Agency in Elizabeth’s England" (2005), U of Pennsylvania P
- Roberts, Josephine A., "The First Part of The Countess of Montgomery’s Urania", pp.15~120 (1995), Arizona Center or Medieval and Renaissance Studies
- Roberts, Josephine A., "The Renaissance Englishwoman in Print", pp.187~207 (1990), U of Massachusetts P
- Salmon, J. H. M., "Stoicism and Roman Example: Seneca and Tacitus in Jacobean England", Journal of the History of Ideas, 50(2), pp.199~225 (1989)
- Sanchez, Melissa E., "The Politics of Masochism in Mary Wroth’s Urania", ELH, 74(2), pp.449~478 (2007)
- Sellars, John, "On Constancy" (2006), Phoenix P
- Sidney, Algernon, "Discourses Concerning Government" (1990), Liberty Classics
- Sidney, Philip, "The Prose Works of Sir Philip Sidney. Vol. 3" (1969), Cambridge UP
- Sommerville, J. P., "Politics and Ideology in England, 1603-1640" (1986), Longman
- Tacitus, Cornelius, "The Complete Works of Tacitus", pp.3~416 (1942), Modern Lib
- Wroth, Mary, "The First Part of the Countess of Montgomery’s Urania" (1995), Arizona Center or Medieval and Renaissance Studies
- Wroth, Mary, "The Second Part of the Countess of Montgomery’s Urania" (1999), Renaissance English Text Society