Bodily Agency and the Limits of Resistance in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This essay examines the complex interplay between personal defiance, sexual transgression, and societal oppression in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things. Focusing on the characters’ bodily transformations and acts of resistance, the essay argues that while individual acts of sexual defiance, such as Ammu’s and the twins’ transgressive lovemaking, serve as powerful expressions of agency, they remain ultimately constrained by entrenched societal hierarchies. These “small,” destructive transgressions neither save the individuals involved nor allow them to gain lasting political agency, yet they hold symbolic significance by challenging oppressive structures. The exploration of individual efforts to live more fully through these acts offers an opportunity to critically reflect on the complexities of bodily agency as a form of political empowerment. Through Roy’s nuanced portrayal of these acts, the novel reveals that while personal defiance can be a means of survival and healing, it also underscores the harsh reality in which such resistance is often insufficient to dismantle systemic forces. The essay explores the ways in which The God of Small Things intertwines the symbolic power of individual defiance with the ongoing oppression faced by its characters, ultimately exposing the limitations, as well as the potential, of sexual and bodily agency within a rigidly hierarchical society.
Abstract
This essay examines the complex interplay between personal defiance, sexual transgression, and societal oppression in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things. Focusing on the characters’ bodily transformations and acts of resistance, the essay argues that while individual acts of sexual defiance, such as Ammu’s and the twins’ transgressive lovemaking, serve as powerful expressions of agency, they remain ultimately constrained by entrenched societal hierarchies. These “small,” destructive transgressions neither save the individuals involved nor allow them to gain lasting political agency, yet they hold symbolic significance by challenging oppressive structures. The exploration of individual efforts to live more fully through these acts offers an opportunity to critically reflect on the complexities of bodily agency as a form of political empowerment. Through Roy’s nuanced portrayal of these acts, the novel reveals that while personal defiance can be a means of survival and healing, it also underscores the harsh reality in which such resistance is often insufficient to dismantle systemic forces. The essay explores the ways in which The God of Small Things intertwines the symbolic power of individual defiance with the ongoing oppression faced by its characters, ultimately exposing the limitations, as well as the potential, of sexual and bodily agency within a rigidly hierarchical society.
참고문헌 (24)
- Ahmad, Aijaz, "Reading Arundhati Roy Politically", Frontline, 8, pp.103~108 (1997)
- Al-Quaderi, Golam Gaus, "Complicity and resistance : Women in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things", Journal of Postcolonial Cultures and Societies, 2(4), pp.62~78 (2011)
- Anand, Divya, "Inhabiting the Space of Literature : An Ecocritical Study of Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things and O. V. Vijayan’s The Legends of Khasak", Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, 12(2), pp.95~108 (2005)
- Bose, Brinda, "In Desire and in Death : Eroticism as Politics in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things", ARIEL, 29(2), pp.59~72 (1998)
- Chae, Youngsuk, "Postcolonial Ecofeminism in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things", Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 51(5), pp.519~530 (2015)
- Fox, L. Chris, "A Martyrology of the Abject: Witnessing and Trauma in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things", ARIEL, 33(3-4), pp.35~60 (2002)
- Froula, Anna, "Globalizing Dissent: Essays on Arundhati Roy", pp.39~46 (2009), Routledge
- Giles, Michelle, "Postcolonial Gothic and The God of Small Things : The Haunting of India’s Past", Postcolonial Text, 6(1), pp.1~15 (2011)
- Gutierrez, Lorraine M, "Working with Women of Color : An Empowerment Perspective", Social Work, 35, pp.149~153 (1990)
- Horrell, Georgie, "Contemporary Adolescent Literature and Culture: The Emergent Adult", pp.47~60 (2012), Ashgate
- Kingsnorth, Paul, "Peace Profile : Arundhati Roy", Peace Review, 13(4), pp.591~595 (2001)
- Kunhi, Rukhaya M., "An Ecocritical Perspective of Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things", SAGE Open, 7(2), pp.1~10 (2017)
- Lanone, Catherine, "Reading Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things", pp.125~143 (2002), EU de Dijon
- McMann, Mindi, "Failed Heterotopias : The Postcolonial Gothic in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things, J. M. Coetzee’s Disgrace, and Anna Burns’s Milkman", Irish University Review, 53(1), pp.127~142 (2023)
- Menon, Priya, "Asserting the Local: White Subversions in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things", ATENEA, 31(1-2), pp.67~80 (2011)
- Mortensen, Peter, "Beyond Postmodernism: Reassessments in Literature, Theory, and Culture", pp.179~195 (2003), Walter de Gruyter
- Mukherjee, Pablo, "Postcolonial Green", pp.17~31 (2010), U of Virginia P
- Nandi, Miriam, "Longing for the Lost(M)Other : Postcolonial Ambivalences in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things", Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 46(2), pp.175~186 (2010)
- Oumhani, Cécile, "Hybridity and Transgression in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things", Commonwealth Essays and Studies, 22(2), pp.85~91 (2000)
- Outka, Elizabeth, "Trauma and Temporal Hybridity in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things", Contemporary Literature, 52(1), pp.21~53 (2011)
- Risam, Roopika, "Another Life", pp.97~116 (2016), Presses universitaires de la Méditerranée
- Roy, Arundhati, "The God of Small Things" (1997), Random House
- St. John. D. E, "Mobilizing the Past : The God of Small Things’ Automotive Ecologies", Journal of Postcolonial Writing, 59(1), pp.1~14 (2023)
- Zimmerman, Marc A., "Handbook of Community Psychology", pp.43~63 (2000), Springer