본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Fragile States and Korea’s Official Development Assistance(ODA)

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류정치외교학

초록

Since 9/11, fragile states have become a key issue in the area of international security and development. Despite the absence of internationally agreed definitions of fragility, consensus on the interconnectedness of the development, security and governance challenges commonly facing fragile states has been formed. Against these backdrops, this paper examines the particular challenges of development cooperation in the fragile contexts and furthers its research on Korea’s ODA disbursement to key fragile partners such as Iraq and Afghanistan. The main argument of the paper is that Korea’s assistance to its fragile partners has been rather fragmented and poorly coordinated in reflection of problems in its overall ODA performance. Absence of an strategic policy framework for the engagement with fragile states and lack of whole of government approaches are main contributors to such a fragmented and uncoordinated performance. Unconducive policy environments prompted by sharp split of public opinion over Korea’s engagement with fragile partners and policy objective motivated by its needs to strengthen the alliance with the US exacerbated the problem. It also questions the suitability of development cooperation as an appropriate tool to address complex problems of fragile states. The paper concludes by puting forward some policy suggestions to improve Korea’s engagement with fragile states, such as drafting integrated policy paper, enhancing monitoring and evaluation, and considering the possible options of mixed instruments of ODA and PKO for resolving fragile states issues.

Abstract

Since 9/11, fragile states have become a key issue in the area of international security and development. Despite the absence of internationally agreed definitions of fragility, consensus on the interconnectedness of the development, security and governance challenges commonly facing fragile states has been formed. Against these backdrops, this paper examines the particular challenges of development cooperation in the fragile contexts and furthers its research on Korea’s ODA disbursement to key fragile partners such as Iraq and Afghanistan. The main argument of the paper is that Korea’s assistance to its fragile partners has been rather fragmented and poorly coordinated in reflection of problems in its overall ODA performance. Absence of an strategic policy framework for the engagement with fragile states and lack of whole of government approaches are main contributors to such a fragmented and uncoordinated performance. Unconducive policy environments prompted by sharp split of public opinion over Korea’s engagement with fragile partners and policy objective motivated by its needs to strengthen the alliance with the US exacerbated the problem. It also questions the suitability of development cooperation as an appropriate tool to address complex problems of fragile states. The paper concludes by puting forward some policy suggestions to improve Korea’s engagement with fragile states, such as drafting integrated policy paper, enhancing monitoring and evaluation, and considering the possible options of mixed instruments of ODA and PKO for resolving fragile states issues.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. DAC Experts Seminar on Aid Effectiveness, Selectivity and Poor Performers, "Policy Implications for Aid Allocations of Recent Research on Aid Effectiveness and Selectivity in paper presented at the Joint Development Centre", pp.2001, Benyon, J
  2. Benyon, "Policy Implications for Aid Allocations of Recent Research on Aid Effectiveness and Selectivity in New Perspectives on Foreign Aid and Economic Development" (2002), Praeger
  3. Aid to Fragile States, Do Donors Help or Hinder?, "Browne, Stephen", UNU-WIDER Discussion Paper, ~, pp.No. 2007 (2007), 01
  4. Burnside, C, "Aid, Policies and Growth", American Economic Review, 90(4) (2000)
  5. Aid, Policies and Growth, "Burnside, C", WB Policy Research Working Paper, ~, pp.1777 (1997)
  6. Determinants of State Fragility and Implications for Aid Allocation, "Carment, David", UNU-WIDER Research Paper, ~, pp.No. 2008 (2008), 46
  7. Collier, P, "Economic Causes of Civil Conflict and their Implications for Policy" (2000), World Bank
  8. Collier, P, "Development Effectivenss: What Have we Learnt", Economic Journal, 114 (2004)
  9. Collier, P, "Aid Policy, and Growth in Post-Conflict Societies", European Economic Review, 48 (2004)
  10. Aid Policy, and Growth in Post-Conflict Societies, "Collier, P", World Bank Policy Research Working Papers, ~, pp.2902 (2002)
  11. DFID, "Why We Need to Work More Effectively in Fragile States", http:, www.dfid.go.uk, pp.pubs, files[DOI]
  12. DFID, "Working Paper Series 1: How Important are Difficult Environments to Achieving the MDGs" (2004)
  13. DFID, "Working Paper on Fragile States: Defining Difficult Environment for Poverty Reduction" (2004)
  14. Diehl, P. F, "Environmental Conflict" (2001), Westview
  15. Easterly, W, "Can Foreign Aid Buy Growth", of Economic Perspectives, 17(3) (2003)
  16. Gunning, J. W, "Rethinking Aid in Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 2000" (2001), World Bank
  17. Enhancing Effective Utilization of Aid in Fragile States, "Gupta, Sanjeev", UNU-WIDER Research Paper, ~, pp.No. 2008 (2008), 07
  18. Van Hear, N, "New Diasporas: The Mass Exodus, Dispersal and Regrouping of Migrant Communities" (1998), University of Washington Press
  19. Homer-Dixon, T. F, "Environment, Scarcity, and Violence" (1999), Princeton Univerwity Press
  20. Leader, Nicholas, "Aid Instruments in Fragile States", PRDE Working Paper, 5 (2005)
  21. Levin, V, "The Forgotten States: Aid Volumes and Volatility in Difficult Partnership Countries 1992-2000" (2004), World Bank
  22. Marshall, Monty G, "Working Paper: Fragility, Instability, and the Failure of States' Council on Foreign Relations" (2008)
  23. "Ministry of Strategy and Finance & The Export-Import Bank of Korea", EDCF Annual Report 2008, ~ (2008)
  24. Morrissey, O, "Aid Effectiveness for Growth and Development" (2002), ODI Opinions
  25. OECD, "Discussion Paper on Service Delivery in Fragile Situations, Key Concepts, Findings and Lessons" (2008)
  26. OECD, "Discussion Paper on Concepts and Dilemmas of State Building in Fragile Situations" (2008)
  27. OECD, "The Principles for Good International Engagement in Fragile States and Situations" (2007)
  28. OECD, "Guidelines and Reference Series, Whole of Government Approaches to Fragile States" (2006)
  29. OECD, "The DAC Guidelines : Helping Prevent Violent Conflict" (2001), OECD
  30. OPM, "Evaluation of the Implementation of the Paris Declaration: Thematic Study-The Applicability of the Paris Declaration in fragile and conflict-affected situations" (2008), Oxford
  31. Robinson, S, "Foreign Aid and Development: Summary and Synthesis in Foreign Aid and Development: Lessons Learnt and Directions for the Future" (2000), Routledge
  32. Stewart, Patrick, "U.S. Policy toward Fragile States: An Integrated Approach to Security and Development, The White House and the World: A Global Development Agenda for the Next U.S. President" (2008)
  33. Stewart, P, "Greater than the Sum of Its Parts? Assessing Whole of Government Approaches to Fragile States" (2007), Lynne Rienner
  34. Torres, M, "Fragile States: Defining Difficult Environments for Poverty Reduction" (2004), Working Papers: Poverty Reduction in Difficult Environments Team, Policy Division

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)