본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

중동이 본 동남아 인식: 근대 오스만 제국-동남아 관계를 중심으로

Middle-Eastern Perception of Southeast Asia: Based on the Relationships between the Ottoman State and Southeast Asia

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류지역학

초록

It is said that Islam was born in the Middle East, but the place to bring it up and to be deep rooted as a religion of daily life is the South East Asia. Despite geographical distances, ties between the Middle East and Southeast Asia had been extremely important in commercial, diplomatic and military fields, for well over fourteen hundred years. These relations were built up mainly in the 16th and 19th centuries. However, historical linkages between the two regions have attracted little attention, and assessments of their significance are curiously lacking. Southeast Asia and the Middle East address this omission by exploring political, economic, familial, educational and religious bonds connecting these areas, both historically and in the contemporary world. In the pre-modern era, there were in general three main streams of Middle Eastern of South East Asia: First, SEA for ME was the area where Islamic holy teaching was well disseminating. Second, very attractive region which supply high valued commodities including spices and incense. Third, the region being full of ignorance needed very urgent and positive Islamic propagation. Under these understandings, this paper is designed to dig out new illumination on these mutual relations and confluence through historical survey based on travel accounts and some first hand documentations focussing on the Ottoman-Indonesian relations of the 16~19th centuries. From the 16th century onward, foreign traders from Cairo, Aden and Khormuz firstly used to call at the harbour cities of Guzarat in India and then they sailed as far as Sumatra and Malaka. As result of the eastern campaign of the Ottoman Sultan Selim I (r.1512~1520) in Syria and Egypt in 1517, the whole Middle Eastern area was bought under the Ottoman rule. Then the Ottoman continues to advance to the Indian Ocean and SEA region, which inevitably brought the Ottomans into conflicts with the Portuguese. In spite of rivalry with the Portuguese, the Ottoman sultans and the Aceh sultans had initiated a wide range commercial, diplomatic, and military cooperations till early 20th centuries. Of course, these cooperative relations rely on common interest between two Muslim states based on Muslim brotherhood to fight against Christian colonial powers. The relations between Ottoman and Aceh, however, were not equal, but protector-vassal status. As a political tool to extend national interest in SEA, the Ottoman government opened its consulate in Singapore in 1864 and Batavia in 1880 respectively. The last Aceh envoy to Istanbul came in 1873, on the eve of the Dutch's attack on Aceh, which is starting point known as Perang Sabil(1873~1906). This last Aceh envoy was sent by the new Aceh Sultan Mahmud Shah and it was led by Abdurrahman Al Zahir who acted as the Minister of Foreign Affairs in the Aceh government. Upon a strong request of Aceh envoy to protect his sultanate from the Dutch, the Ottoman government however could not respond positively to the Acehnese demands under the pressure of the Western states. As a result of long relations with the Middle East, SEA accepted Islam as their daily life and culture, but they reinterpreted it with different faces, that is more or less cultural understanding rather than religious dogma. Moreover, Islam in Southeast Asia is conventionally understood as a synthesis of Middle Eastern and local ideas. The pervasiveness of these influences makes it clear that they will continue to shape political and economic relations, migration patterns, the dissemination of knowledge, and radials of Islamic militancy for a long time to come. Such relationships contribute to regional and global events in many crucial ways, making the present research timely and important not only for scholars but also for anyone interested in the future of Asia and the Middle East. In this sense, SEA shall continue the role as a cultural professor at the present and the future for the Middle East showing how Islamic value can be harmonized with other culture and among different values.

Abstract

It is said that Islam was born in the Middle East, but the place to bring it up and to be deep rooted as a religion of daily life is the South East Asia. Despite geographical distances, ties between the Middle East and Southeast Asia had been extremely important in commercial, diplomatic and military fields, for well over fourteen hundred years. These relations were built up mainly in the 16th and 19th centuries. However, historical linkages between the two regions have attracted little attention, and assessments of their significance are curiously lacking. Southeast Asia and the Middle East address this omission by exploring political, economic, familial, educational and religious bonds connecting these areas, both historically and in the contemporary world. In the pre-modern era, there were in general three main streams of Middle Eastern of South East Asia: First, SEA for ME was the area where Islamic holy teaching was well disseminating. Second, very attractive region which supply high valued commodities including spices and incense. Third, the region being full of ignorance needed very urgent and positive Islamic propagation. Under these understandings, this paper is designed to dig out new illumination on these mutual relations and confluence through historical survey based on travel accounts and some first hand documentations focussing on the Ottoman-Indonesian relations of the 16~19th centuries. From the 16th century onward, foreign traders from Cairo, Aden and Khormuz firstly used to call at the harbour cities of Guzarat in India and then they sailed as far as Sumatra and Malaka. As result of the eastern campaign of the Ottoman Sultan Selim I (r.1512~1520) in Syria and Egypt in 1517, the whole Middle Eastern area was bought under the Ottoman rule. Then the Ottoman continues to advance to the Indian Ocean and SEA region, which inevitably brought the Ottomans into conflicts with the Portuguese. In spite of rivalry with the Portuguese, the Ottoman sultans and the Aceh sultans had initiated a wide range commercial, diplomatic, and military cooperations till early 20th centuries. Of course, these cooperative relations rely on common interest between two Muslim states based on Muslim brotherhood to fight against Christian colonial powers. The relations between Ottoman and Aceh, however, were not equal, but protector-vassal status. As a political tool to extend national interest in SEA, the Ottoman government opened its consulate in Singapore in 1864 and Batavia in 1880 respectively. The last Aceh envoy to Istanbul came in 1873, on the eve of the Dutch's attack on Aceh, which is starting point known as Perang Sabil(1873~1906). This last Aceh envoy was sent by the new Aceh Sultan Mahmud Shah and it was led by Abdurrahman Al Zahir who acted as the Minister of Foreign Affairs in the Aceh government. Upon a strong request of Aceh envoy to protect his sultanate from the Dutch, the Ottoman government however could not respond positively to the Acehnese demands under the pressure of the Western states. As a result of long relations with the Middle East, SEA accepted Islam as their daily life and culture, but they reinterpreted it with different faces, that is more or less cultural understanding rather than religious dogma. Moreover, Islam in Southeast Asia is conventionally understood as a synthesis of Middle Eastern and local ideas. The pervasiveness of these influences makes it clear that they will continue to shape political and economic relations, migration patterns, the dissemination of knowledge, and radials of Islamic militancy for a long time to come. Such relationships contribute to regional and global events in many crucial ways, making the present research timely and important not only for scholars but also for anyone interested in the future of Asia and the Middle East. In this sense, SEA shall continue the role as a cultural professor at the present and the future for the Middle East showing how Islamic value can be harmonized with other culture and among different values.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. 이희수, "한-이슬람 교류사" (1991), 문덕사
  2. Ali, S.M., "Arab Geography" (1960), Institute of Islamic Studies
  3. Ambary, "The Establishment of Islamic Rule in Eastern Coast of Sumatra and Its Role in Maritime Silk Road in the XIII - XVIIth" (1994), International Seminar of The Contribution of the Islamic Culture for The Maritime Silk Route, Quanzhou, China 21-26 February 1994
  4. BOA(Basbakanlik Osmanli Arsivi), "Muhimme Defteri 7", ~
  5. BOA, "Irade Meclis-i vala, 7935", ~
  6. BOA, "IMM. Nr.4835", ~
  7. BOA, "Y.PRK.ESA, 28", 66
  8. FO(Foreign Office), "37", 1148, No.7716, very confidential
  9. "Sabah Gazetesi(Istanbul)", ~ (1890)
  10. Engineer, Asghar Ali, "Islam in Asia" (1986), Lahore, Vanguard
  11. Goksoy, Ismail Hakki, "Ottoman-Aceh Relations According to the Turkish Sources", First International Conference of Aceh and Indian Ocean Studies, Asia Research Institute
  12. Hammer, "History of Ottoman Empire", Istanbul, ~ (1984)
  13. Lee, Hee Soo, "The Advent of Islam in Korea", IRCICA, Istanbul, ~ (1997)
  14. Lee, Hee Soo, "Islam ve Turk Kulturunun Uzak Dogu'ya Yayilmasi", Ankara, Turkiye Diyanet Vakfi, ~ (1991)
  15. Marsden, "The History of Sumatra" (1811), London
  16. Mohamad, "The Influence of Turkey on the State of Johor: A Study on Majallat Al-Ahkam Al-'Adliyyah", Korea Journal of Islamic Culture, IV (2000)
  17. Mughul, "Kanuni Devri: Osmanlilarin Hind Okyanusu Politikasi ve Osmanli-Hind Munasebetleri" (1987), Ankara, Pubication of Ministry of Culture and Tourism
  18. Othman, "The Origin and Contributions of Early Arabs in Malaya" (2009), South East and The Middle East
  19. Reid, "The Ottomans in South East Asia, Asia Research Paper series of Asia Research Institute" (2005), National University of Singapore
  20. Reid, "Sixteenth Century Turkish Influence in Western Indonesia", Journal of South East Asian History, 10(3) (1969)
  21. Rickleps, M.C, "The Middle East Connection and Reform and Revival Movements among the Putihan in 19th century Java" (2009), South East and The Middle East Stanford
  22. Sareen,T.R, "Secret Documents on the Singapore Mutiny" (1995), New Delhi, Mounto Publishing House
  23. Schmidt, "Through the Legation Window 1876-1926: Four Essays on Dutch" (1992), Dutch-Indian and Ottoman History, Istanbul
  24. Seljuk, "Relations between the Ottoman Empire and the Muslim Kingdoms in the Malay-Indonesian Archipelago", Der Islam, 57 (1980)
  25. Shah, "Aci Padisahi Sultan Alauddin'in Kanuni Sultan Suleyman'a Mektubu", DTCF Dergisi, 5(3) (1967)
  26. Tagliacozzo, Eric, "South East Asia and the Middle East" (2009), Islam, Movement, and the Lonue Duree, Stanford
  27. Uzuncarsili, "Osmanli Tarihi II" (1983), Ankara
  28. Woltring, J, "Bescehelen betreffende de Bultenlandse Politiek van Nederland 2de Periode, I-III, Haegue", ~ (1962)
  29. Wibisono, "The Early Islamic Trading Settlement in the East Coast of North Sumatra During XV Century", pp.21~26 (1994), International Seminar of The Contribution of Islamic Culture for Maritime Silk Road, Quanzhou, China

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)