본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

이슬람 국가 수쿠크 사용과 기업 부채조달 행태: 말레이시아 사례

Issuing Sukuk Bonds and Debt Financing in Islamic Countries: Evidence from Malaysian Firms

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류지역학

초록

This paper examines the strategy to procure liquidity by issuing Sukuk, i.e. Islamic bond, in Malaysia, which due to the speed and volume of issuing Sukuk the attention has been paid to. The guiding research question is whether Malay companies prefer Sukuk to general liabilities due to its positive impact on firm profitability. The empirical data for Malay publicly listed companies in manufacturing has been collected from Osiris covering the year of 2003-2017, and the analysis has been done by usning yearly time series and longitudinal data. Employing the fixed effect panel model, the main findings of this study are as follows: first, financing by issuing Sukuk(noncurrent) has been positively associated with the financial performance such as ROIC and ROE. In contrast, It has been negatively associated with the market performance such as PBR and PER. Second, as for financial performance concerned, Malay companies prefer Sukuk(noncurrent) to equity or long-term liability. In contrast, for market performance they prefer the latters. As such, it is possible to conclude that pecking order theory works in the financing strategy of Malay companies.

Abstract

This paper examines the strategy to procure liquidity by issuing Sukuk, i.e. Islamic bond, in Malaysia, which due to the speed and volume of issuing Sukuk the attention has been paid to. The guiding research question is whether Malay companies prefer Sukuk to general liabilities due to its positive impact on firm profitability. The empirical data for Malay publicly listed companies in manufacturing has been collected from Osiris covering the year of 2003-2017, and the analysis has been done by usning yearly time series and longitudinal data. Employing the fixed effect panel model, the main findings of this study are as follows: first, financing by issuing Sukuk(noncurrent) has been positively associated with the financial performance such as ROIC and ROE. In contrast, It has been negatively associated with the market performance such as PBR and PER. Second, as for financial performance concerned, Malay companies prefer Sukuk(noncurrent) to equity or long-term liability. In contrast, for market performance they prefer the latters. As such, it is possible to conclude that pecking order theory works in the financing strategy of Malay companies.

참고문헌 (36)

  1. 곽세영, "자본조달결정 및 금융형태의 선택", 재무관리논총, 6(1), pp.1~22 (2000)
  2. 구재운, "한국 제조기업 투자의 금융요인에 대한 실증분석:자금조달순위가설과 잉여현금흐름가설을 중심으로", 금융연구, 12(1), pp.29~54 (2007), 한국금융학회
  3. 김문겸, "부채가 수익성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 중소기업과 대기업의 비교", 기업경영연구, 19(3), pp.47~70 (2012), 한국기업경영학회[DOI]
  4. 김병호, "말레이시아 수쿠크 유동성에 관한 연구", 아랍어와 아랍문학, 22(1), pp.21~41 (2018), 한국아랍어아랍문학회[DOI]
  5. 김원기, "자산형태와 자본구조와의 관련성에 관한 실증적 연구-한국상장기업을 중심으로", 재무관리논총, 1(2), pp.331~349 (1994)
  6. 김홍광, "중국수출기업의 부채 만기 구조 연구", 국제지역연구, 11(1), pp.496~521 (2007), 국제지역학회
  7. 박성태, "자본구조결정요인에 대한 실증적 연구", 재무관리연구, 7(2), pp.81~114 (1990)
  8. 선우석호, "한국기업의 재무구조 결정요인과 자본비용", 재무연구, 3(0), pp.61~80 (1990)
  9. 신동령, "한국제조기업의 자금조달행태와 재무구조 결정요인에 관한 연구", 재무관리연구, 23(2), pp.109~141 (2006), 한국재무관리학회
  10. 이원흠, "외국인투자기업과 대기업집단 간의 재무행태 차이에 관한 실증", 한국증권학회지, 29(1), pp.145~161 (2001)
  11. 최선호, "기업의 자본조달행태 분석을 통한 자본구조이론과 자본조달이론의 재조명", 재무연구, 3(0), pp.45~60 (1990)
  12. Alvi, I. A., "A Comprehensive Study of the Global Sukuk Market" (2017), IIFM
  13. Barclay, M. J., "The Maturity Structure of Corporate Debt", The Journal of Finance, 50(2), pp.609~631 (1995)
  14. Baskin, J., "AN Empirical Investigation of the Pecking Order Hypothesis", Financial Management, 18(1), pp.26~35 (1989)
  15. Bhojnagarwala, N., "Cross-Sector - Islamic Finance: Strong longer-term growth prospects despite relatively flat 2018" (2018), Moody’s Investors Service
  16. Damak, M., "Islamic Finance in 2018: Slow Growth is the New Normal", Islamic Finance Outlook, ~ (2017)
  17. Fama, E. F., "Testing Trade-Off and Pecking Order Predictions About Dividends and Debt", The Review of Financial Studies, 15(1), pp.1~33 (2002)
  18. Frank, M. Z., "Testing the pecking order theory of capital structure", Journal of Financial Economies, 67(2), pp.217~248 (2003)
  19. Graham, J. R., "How Big Are the Tax Benefits of Debt?", The Journal of Finance, 55(5), pp.1901~1941 (2000)
  20. Hackbarth, D., "Capital Risk and Macroeconomic Conditions", Journal of Financial Economics, 82(3), pp.519~550 (2006)
  21. Jensen, M. C., "Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers", The American Economic Review, 76(2), pp.323~329 (1986)
  22. Kayhan, A., "Firms Histories and Capital Structure", Journal of Financial Economics, 83(1), pp.1~32 (2007)
  23. Leary, M., "Do Firms Rebalance Their Capital Structure?", The Journal of Finance, 60(6), pp.2575~2619 (2005)
  24. Long, M. S., "Corporate Capital Structures in the United States", pp.325~352 (1985), University of Chicago Press
  25. Modigliani, F., "The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment", The American Economic Review, 48(3), pp.261~297 (1958)
  26. Molina, Carlos A., "Are Firms Under leveraged? An Examination of the Effect of Leverage on Default Probabilities", The Journal of Finance, 60(3), pp.1427~1459 (2005)
  27. Myers, S. C., "The Capital Structure Puzzle", The Journal of Finance, 39(3), pp.574~592 (1984)
  28. Myers, S. C., "Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have", Journal of Financial Economies, 13(2), pp.187~221 (1984)
  29. Rajan, R. G., "What Do We Know about Capital Structure? Some Evidence from International Data", The Journal of Finance, 50(5), pp.1421~1460 (1995)
  30. "S&P Global Ratings 2017" (2017)[URL]
  31. Schwartz, E., "Some Surrogate Evidence in Suport of the Concept of Optimal Financial Structure", The Journal of Finance, 22(1), pp.10~18 (1967)
  32. Shyam-Sunder, L., "Testing Static Tradeoff Against Pecking Order Models of Capital Structure", Journal of Financial Economics, 51(2), pp.219~244 (1999)
  33. Smith, C. W., "The investment opportunity set and corporate financing, dividend, and compensation policies", Journal of Financial Economics, 32(3), pp.263~292 (1992)
  34. Stohs, M. H., "The Determinants of Corporate Debt Maturity Structure", The Journal of Business, 69(3), pp.279~312 (1996)
  35. Titman, S., "The Determinants of Capital Structure Choice", The Journal of Finance, 43(1), pp.1~19 (1988)
  36. Wald, J. K., "How Firm Characteristics Affect Capital Structure: an International Comparison", The Journal of Financial Research, 22(2), pp.161~187 (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)