본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Biopolitics in A Journal of the Plague Year

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The primary purpose of this essay is to survey early modern biopolitics represented in Defoe’s Journal of the Plague Year. By looking back at the plague outbreak that happened a generation earlier, Defoe discusses the rise of the biopolitical state from an eighteenth-century perspective. During the middle ages and well into early modernity, the plague was seen as a sign of wonder and an expression of God’s exceptional intervention. However, Defoe’s narrator H.F. gradually secularizes this view and understands the plague as an issue of the city’s biopolitical control. This shift from a theocentric to a primarily bio￾political view is conterminous with the transformation captured by Michel Foucault’s concept of “governmentality.” In H.F.’s account, starting with the basic control of discourse and progressing to more extreme measures such as the shutting up of houses, everything is subject to the city’s biopolitical controls. H.F.’s understanding of the rise of a biopolitical state is, nonetheless, never clear enough as he maintains a certain ambiguity toward it. Critics have characterized Defoe’s narrator as unreliable, pointing out his self-contradictory perspective. I would argue, however, that H.F.’s antinomic accounts are derived not from his subjective instability or his failed recognition of reality; rather, they occur because he is fully aware of the “enigma” of biopower, which overlaps with the power to kill (thanatopower) when it is extremely developed. H.F.’s lesson is still useful today because it allows us to discuss human rights in the midst of a pandemic outbreak that requires extreme state controls.

Abstract

The primary purpose of this essay is to survey early modern biopolitics represented in Defoe’s Journal of the Plague Year. By looking back at the plague outbreak that happened a generation earlier, Defoe discusses the rise of the biopolitical state from an eighteenth-century perspective. During the middle ages and well into early modernity, the plague was seen as a sign of wonder and an expression of God’s exceptional intervention. However, Defoe’s narrator H.F. gradually secularizes this view and understands the plague as an issue of the city’s biopolitical control. This shift from a theocentric to a primarily bio￾political view is conterminous with the transformation captured by Michel Foucault’s concept of “governmentality.” In H.F.’s account, starting with the basic control of discourse and progressing to more extreme measures such as the shutting up of houses, everything is subject to the city’s biopolitical controls. H.F.’s understanding of the rise of a biopolitical state is, nonetheless, never clear enough as he maintains a certain ambiguity toward it. Critics have characterized Defoe’s narrator as unreliable, pointing out his self-contradictory perspective. I would argue, however, that H.F.’s antinomic accounts are derived not from his subjective instability or his failed recognition of reality; rather, they occur because he is fully aware of the “enigma” of biopower, which overlaps with the power to kill (thanatopower) when it is extremely developed. H.F.’s lesson is still useful today because it allows us to discuss human rights in the midst of a pandemic outbreak that requires extreme state controls.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Arendt, Hannah, "Of Human Condition" (1998), U of Chicago P
  2. Bender, John, "Imagining the Penitentiary: Fiction and the Architecture of Mind in Eighteenth-Century England" (1987), U of Chicago P
  3. Boyce, Niall, "Bills of Mortality: Tracking Disease in Early Modern London", Lancet (2020)
  4. Defoe, Daniel, "A Journal of the Plague Year" (2003), Penguin
  5. DeGabriele, Peter, "Intimacy, Survival, and Resistance: Daniel Defoe’s A Journal of the Plague Year", English Literary History, 77(1), pp.1~23 (2010)
  6. Esposito, Roberto, "Bios: Biopolitics and Philosophy" (2007), U of Minnesota P
  7. Ewald, François, "The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality with Two Lectures by and an Interview with Michel Foucault", pp.197~210 (1991), Chicago UP
  8. Foucault, Michel, "The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-1979" (2008), Palgrave
  9. Foucault, Michel, "Discipline and Punish: The Birth of Prison" (1995), Vintage Books
  10. Foucault, Michel, "History of Madness" (2006), Routledge
  11. Foucault, Michel, "Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977-1978" (2007), Palgrave
  12. Foucault, Michel, "Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975-1976" (2003), Picador
  13. Gilman, Ernest, "Plague Writing in Early Modern England" (2009), U of Chicago P
  14. Hacking, Ian, "The Foucault Effect:Studies in Governmentality with Two Lectures by and an Interview with Michel Foucault", pp.181~196 (1991), Chicago UP
  15. Hammill, Graham, "The Mosaic Constitution: Political Theology and Imagination from Machiavelli to Milton" (2012), U of Chicago P
  16. Juengel, Scott, "Decomposition: Defoe and the Corpse", The Journal of Narrative Technique, 25(2), pp.139~153 (1995)
  17. Kim, Jaecheol, "The Plague and Immunity in Othello", Comparative Drama, 51(1), pp.23~42 (2017)
  18. McDowell, Paula, "Defoe and the Contagion of the Oral: Modeling Media Shift in A Journal of the Plague Year", PMLA, 121(1), pp.87~106 (2006)
  19. McKinlay, Alan, "Foucault, Plague, Defoe", Culture and Organization, 15(2), pp.167~184 (2009)
  20. Moore, Benjamin, "Governing Discourses: Problems of Narrative Authority in A Journal of the Plague Year", The Eighteenth Century: Theory and Interpretation, 33(2), pp.133~147 (1992)
  21. Moore, John Robert, "Daniel Defoe: Citizen of the Modern World" (1958), Chicago UP
  22. Novak, Maximillian E, "Realism, Myth, and History in Defoe’s Fiction" (1993), U of Nebraska P
  23. Schmitt, Carl, "Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty" (1985), MIT P
  24. Seager, Nicholas, "Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics: Epistemology and Fiction in Defoe’s A Journal of the Plague Year", The Modern Language Review, 103(3), pp.639~653 (2008)
  25. Slack, Paul, "The Impact of the Plague in Tudor and Stuart England" (1985), Routledge
  26. Stow, John, "A Survey of London" (1987), Everyman
  27. Wagner, Martin, "Defoe, Foucault, and the Politics of the Plague", Studies in English Literature 1500-1900, 57(3), pp.501~519 (2017)
  28. Wall, Cynthia, "Novel Streets: The Rebuilding of London and Defoe’s A Journal of the Plague Year", Studies in the Novel, 30(2), pp.164~177 (1998)
  29. Vincent, Thomas, "the latter in the year 1666. II. The interpretation of the voice, in a discovery, 1. Of the cause of these judgments, where you have a catalogue of London’s sins. 2. Of the design of these judgments, where you have an enumeration of the duties God calls for by this terrible voice. By T. V", By T.V., ~
  30. Zimmerman, Everett, "H. F.’s Meditations: A Journal of the Plague Year", PMLA, 87(3), pp.417~423 (1972)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)