본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Sovereignty, Biopower, Immunity: Racialized Bodies in Robinson Crusoe

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This paper employs theories of biopolitics to examine the narrator’s rise to sovereign power and his exercise of biopower upon racialized bodies in Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe. I argue that race is a crucial factor that not only enables but further complicates Crusoe’s exertion of sovereign authority. Drawing upon the narrative’s conflicted division between, or occasional conflation of, zoe and bios, key terms through which Giorgio Agamben explicates conditions of human life, this paper seeks to create an intervention in existing scholarly discussions by examining the complex nature of Crusoe’s sovereign power and sovereign exception. By closely examining scenes where Crusoe interacts with cannibals and his slave/companion Friday, with a particular focus on the narrator’s initial reluctance in, and ultimate enforcement of, punishing cannibals for their barbarity, this paper explores configurations of race in Defoe’s early novel. The analysis mainly focuses on how different characters’ racial identities serve as impacting factors in Crusoe’s sovereign decision. Crusoe’s sovereign power becomes a hybridized version of governing, in which elements of absolute sovereignty and disciplinary training merge. Roberto Esposito’s logic of immunization anchors the reading of Crusoe’s incorporation of the racialized Other into his sovereignty, in which his initial desire to establish a protective boundary between himself and foreign, threatening elements becomes altered. I read Crusoe’s education of Friday as a process of dilution that takes place in advance of immunization via vaccination. Tracing the theoretical discussions of governmentality and sovereignty in biopolitical theory through Defoe’s early novel, this paper seeks to examine how race serves as a biopolitical factor in Crusoe’s attempt to establish his sovereign power on the island.

Abstract

This paper employs theories of biopolitics to examine the narrator’s rise to sovereign power and his exercise of biopower upon racialized bodies in Daniel Defoe’s Robinson Crusoe. I argue that race is a crucial factor that not only enables but further complicates Crusoe’s exertion of sovereign authority. Drawing upon the narrative’s conflicted division between, or occasional conflation of, zoe and bios, key terms through which Giorgio Agamben explicates conditions of human life, this paper seeks to create an intervention in existing scholarly discussions by examining the complex nature of Crusoe’s sovereign power and sovereign exception. By closely examining scenes where Crusoe interacts with cannibals and his slave/companion Friday, with a particular focus on the narrator’s initial reluctance in, and ultimate enforcement of, punishing cannibals for their barbarity, this paper explores configurations of race in Defoe’s early novel. The analysis mainly focuses on how different characters’ racial identities serve as impacting factors in Crusoe’s sovereign decision. Crusoe’s sovereign power becomes a hybridized version of governing, in which elements of absolute sovereignty and disciplinary training merge. Roberto Esposito’s logic of immunization anchors the reading of Crusoe’s incorporation of the racialized Other into his sovereignty, in which his initial desire to establish a protective boundary between himself and foreign, threatening elements becomes altered. I read Crusoe’s education of Friday as a process of dilution that takes place in advance of immunization via vaccination. Tracing the theoretical discussions of governmentality and sovereignty in biopolitical theory through Defoe’s early novel, this paper seeks to examine how race serves as a biopolitical factor in Crusoe’s attempt to establish his sovereign power on the island.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Agamben, Giorgio, "Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life" (1998), Stanford UP
  2. Ahmed, Sara, "Real Bodies: A Sociological Introduction", pp.46~63 (2002), Palgrave
  3. Barney, Richard A., "Plots of Enlightenment: Education and the Novel in Eighteenth- Century England", pp.206~254 (1999), Stanford UP
  4. Bender, John, "Imagining the Penitentiary: Fiction and the Architecture of Mind in Eighteenth-Century England", pp.42~61 (1987), U of Chicago P
  5. Boever, Arne De, "Narrative Care: Biopolitics and the Novel" (2013), Bloomsbury
  6. Brantlinger, Patrick, "Taming Cannibals: Race and the Victorians", pp.1~23 (2011), Cornell UP
  7. Breu, Christopher, "Insistence of the Material: Literature in the Age of Biopolitics" (2014), U of Minnesota P
  8. Brown, Jayna, "Keywords for African American Studies", pp.29~33 (2018), New York UP
  9. Defoe, Daniel, "Robinson Crusoe. 1719" (2003), Penguin
  10. Esposito, Roberto, "Immunitas: The Protection and Negation of Life" (2013), Polity
  11. Faber, Ben, "Sublimer Aspects: Interfaces between Literature, Aesthetics, and Theology", pp.5~19 (2007), Cambridge Scholars Publishing
  12. Foucault, Michel, "The History of Sexuality Volume I: An Introduction" (1990), Vintage
  13. Gautier, Gary, "Slavery and the Fashioning of Race in Oroonoko, Robinson Crusoe, and Equiano’s Life", The Eighteenth Century, 42(2), pp.161~179 (2001)
  14. Griffiths, Michael R., "Biopolitics and Memory in Postcolonial Literature and Culture", pp.1~28 (2016), Ashgate
  15. Hobbes, Thomas, "Leviathan" (2008), Oxford UP
  16. Howell, Alison, "Racism in Foucauldian Security Studies: Biopolitics, Liberal War, and the Whitewashing of Colonial and Racial Violence", International Political Sociology, pp.1~18 (2018)
  17. Miller-Keane, O’Toole, "Miller-Keane Encyclopedia and Dictionary of Medicine, Nursing & Allied Health" (2003), Saunders
  18. Novak, Maxmillian E., "Defoe and the Nature of Man" (1963), Oxford UP
  19. Schonhorn, Manuel, "Defoe’s Politics: Parliament, Power, Kingship, and Robinson Crusoe" (1991), Cambridge UP
  20. Weheliye, Alexander G., "Habeas Viscus: Racializing Assemblages, Biopolitics, and Black Feminist Theories of the Human" (2014), Duke UP
  21. Wheeler, Roxann, "The Complexion of Race: Categories of Difference in Eighteenth- Century British Culture" (2000), U of Pennsylvania P
  22. Ziarek, Ewa Plonowska, "Bare Life on Strike : Notes on the Biopolitics of Race and Gender", South Atlantic Quarterly, 107(1), pp.89~105 (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)