Ontological Violence: “Ambiguous Undulations” between “Sunday Morning” and Sunny Day’s Morning
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In his early poems, Wallace Stevens shows us different gestures, compared with his later poems, when he acquires reality by faculty of imagination. The former is made of ontological violence while the latter is revealed by bareness of less sensuality. However, they are the identical gestures, though from different angles, to accomplish things as they are rather than the ideas of things. In “Sunday Morning,” ontological violence occurs in such epistemological couples as thought and thing, mind and world, and imagination and reality. Especially, in order to recuperate his poetic reality, Stevens undermines the traditional hierarchy between heavenly divinity and earthly divinity. In the poem, Christianity faces a critical challenge and then it is disempowered by the earthly divinity. Additionally, by disadvantaging religion, he wants to raise his poetic issue of the faculty of imagination to acquire reality. Stevens’ concept of imagination is less subjective and more transcendental than Kantian one. After the ontological violence, Christian divinity and mythic gods leave ontological boundary for earthly divinity in an ambiguous way. In other words, between “Sunday” and “sunny day,” the ontological conflicts haunt us throughout the poem as if the violence would happen between imagination and reality. For Stevens, both Christian divinity and mythic gods are mere obstacles to real divinity; both play a mere role of imagination before reality is revealed. Whatever reality is, imagination is always ready to draw an ontological line of reality in an ambiguous way,regardless of how long it lasts. In general, most ontological violence requires such physical remnants of conflicts as borderline, deaths, and pains which still prevail in the poem. Those ontological remnants remain to be found on earth. The sky is an abstract borderline between heaven and earth because in a sense, it belongs to both earthly landscape and heavenly sphere. Without any ontological borderline or threshold, there is no recognition of the divinity because the vitality of divinity is inflamed in continuous transgression of the other. After the final ontological conflict between heaven and earth,there remains only ambiguous borderline near the earth beside the friendlier sky.
Abstract
In his early poems, Wallace Stevens shows us different gestures, compared with his later poems, when he acquires reality by faculty of imagination. The former is made of ontological violence while the latter is revealed by bareness of less sensuality. However, they are the identical gestures, though from different angles, to accomplish things as they are rather than the ideas of things. In “Sunday Morning,” ontological violence occurs in such epistemological couples as thought and thing, mind and world, and imagination and reality. Especially, in order to recuperate his poetic reality, Stevens undermines the traditional hierarchy between heavenly divinity and earthly divinity. In the poem, Christianity faces a critical challenge and then it is disempowered by the earthly divinity. Additionally, by disadvantaging religion, he wants to raise his poetic issue of the faculty of imagination to acquire reality. Stevens’ concept of imagination is less subjective and more transcendental than Kantian one. After the ontological violence, Christian divinity and mythic gods leave ontological boundary for earthly divinity in an ambiguous way. In other words, between “Sunday” and “sunny day,” the ontological conflicts haunt us throughout the poem as if the violence would happen between imagination and reality. For Stevens, both Christian divinity and mythic gods are mere obstacles to real divinity; both play a mere role of imagination before reality is revealed. Whatever reality is, imagination is always ready to draw an ontological line of reality in an ambiguous way,regardless of how long it lasts. In general, most ontological violence requires such physical remnants of conflicts as borderline, deaths, and pains which still prevail in the poem. Those ontological remnants remain to be found on earth. The sky is an abstract borderline between heaven and earth because in a sense, it belongs to both earthly landscape and heavenly sphere. Without any ontological borderline or threshold, there is no recognition of the divinity because the vitality of divinity is inflamed in continuous transgression of the other. After the final ontological conflict between heaven and earth,there remains only ambiguous borderline near the earth beside the friendlier sky.
참고문헌 (12)
- Cook, Eleanor, "A Reader’s Guide to Wallace Stevens" (2007), Princeton UP
- Critchley,Simon, "Things Merely Are: Philosophy in the Poetry of Wallace Stevens" (2005), Routledge
- Feshbach, Sidney, "Elegy Rebuffed by Pastoral Eclogue in Wallace Stevens’ ‘Sunday Morning.’ In: Analecta Husserliana: The Year Book of Phenomenological Research" (2000), Kluwer Academic Publisher
- Maeder, Beverly, "Wallace Stevens’ Experimental Language: The Lion in the Lute" (1999), St. Martin’s Press
- Miller, J. Hillis, "Poets of Reality: Six Twentieth-Century Writers" (1966), Belknap Press of Harvard UP
- Rehder, Robert, "Stevens and Harmonium. In: The Cambridge Companion to Wallace Stevens" (2007), Cambridge UP
- Santayana, George, "Interpretations of Poetry and Religion" (1986), MIT Press
- Stevens, Wallace, "Collected Poems" (1954), Alfred A. Knopf
- Stevens, Wallace, "Opus Posthumous" (1957), Alfred A. Knopf
- Stevens, Wallace, "The Necessary Angel: Essays on Reality and the Imagination" (1960), Faber and Faber
- Schopenhauer, Arthur, "The World as Will and Idea" (1950), Routledge
- Vendler, Helen, "On Extended Wings: Wallace Stevens’ Longer Poems" (1969), Harvard UP