‘Magic Imperialism’: The Logic of Magic in Edith Nesbit’s Fantasy Novels
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines the British imperialism found in Edith Nesbit’s fantasy stories by looking at the function of magic and of the hierarchical relationships seen in the books. Although Edith Nesbit is relatively unknown in Korea, she is widely recognized as having had a great influence on the 20th century British literary world, and is also well-known for her political position as a socialist. Nesbit’s fantasy books are commonly differentiated from other Victorian children’s books written before her in that she created realistic and liberal children characters and rejected the adult didactic tone. While Nesbit’s books have been recognized as revolutionary and being distinguished from other Victorian children’s books, I suggest that the ideas found in her fantasy novels largely include the dominant Victorian message of British imperialism. This imperial ideology is delivered by the logic of magic and the multilateral hierarchies. The two magic creatures (The Psammead and the Phoenix) and the two magic items from an Oriental background (the Carpet and the Amulet) all have a magic power to grant people’s wishes, wholeheartedly exercising their power and knowledge for the sake of the British characters. While the magic agents serve to fulfill the children’s wishes, the children aim to please their parents and to benefit their family, showing layered hierarchies among the characters. Also, there is a hierarchical distinction between the magic items and the magic creatures in that the magic items have no voice to express themselves but only serve and obey the British children. The foreign characters that the children encounter in their adventures also cooperate with the British characters to help them to fulfill their goals. In short, magic frees the children from the adult-centered world but ultimately their free adventures serve their parents and other adults, and represent the ideals and hierarchical concepts of British imperialism. Thus, Nesbit’s position as a modern writer seems to be ambiguous, switching between modern characterization and style, and the old Victorian imperial messages that also exist in her fantasy novels.
Abstract
This paper examines the British imperialism found in Edith Nesbit’s fantasy stories by looking at the function of magic and of the hierarchical relationships seen in the books. Although Edith Nesbit is relatively unknown in Korea, she is widely recognized as having had a great influence on the 20th century British literary world, and is also well-known for her political position as a socialist. Nesbit’s fantasy books are commonly differentiated from other Victorian children’s books written before her in that she created realistic and liberal children characters and rejected the adult didactic tone. While Nesbit’s books have been recognized as revolutionary and being distinguished from other Victorian children’s books, I suggest that the ideas found in her fantasy novels largely include the dominant Victorian message of British imperialism. This imperial ideology is delivered by the logic of magic and the multilateral hierarchies. The two magic creatures (The Psammead and the Phoenix) and the two magic items from an Oriental background (the Carpet and the Amulet) all have a magic power to grant people’s wishes, wholeheartedly exercising their power and knowledge for the sake of the British characters. While the magic agents serve to fulfill the children’s wishes, the children aim to please their parents and to benefit their family, showing layered hierarchies among the characters. Also, there is a hierarchical distinction between the magic items and the magic creatures in that the magic items have no voice to express themselves but only serve and obey the British children. The foreign characters that the children encounter in their adventures also cooperate with the British characters to help them to fulfill their goals. In short, magic frees the children from the adult-centered world but ultimately their free adventures serve their parents and other adults, and represent the ideals and hierarchical concepts of British imperialism. Thus, Nesbit’s position as a modern writer seems to be ambiguous, switching between modern characterization and style, and the old Victorian imperial messages that also exist in her fantasy novels.
참고문헌 (13)
- Bar-Yosef, Eitan, "E. Nesbit and the fantasy of reverse colonization: how many miles to modern Babylon?", English Literature in Transition 1880-1920, 46(1), pp.4~20 (2003)
- Bowers, Maggie Ann, "Magic Realism" (2004), Routledge
- Briggs, Julia, "A Woman of Passion: The Life of Edith Nesbit 1858-1924" (1924), Hutchinson
- Crouch, Marcus, "Treasure Seekers and Borrowers: Children’s Books in Britain 1900-1960" (1960), The Library Association
- Heywood, Colin, "A History of Childhood: Children and Childhood in the West from Medieval to Modern Times" (2001), Polity Press
- Kiernan,V.G, "The Lords of Human Kind: European attitudes toward the outside world in the Imperial Age" (1969), Weidenfeld and Nicolson
- Nesbit, Edith, "Five Children and It" (2004), Puffin Classics
- Nesbit,Edith, "The Phoenix and the Carpet" (1994), Puffin Classics
- Nesbit, Edith, "The Story of the Amulet" (1996), Puffin Classics
- Nikolajeva, Maria, "The Magical Code: the Use of Magical Patterns in Fantasy for Children" (1988), Almqvist and Wiksell
- Said, Edward, "Culture and Imperialism" (1994), Knopf
- Said, Edward, "Orientalism" (2003), Penguin Books
- Spivack, Charlotte, "E. Nesbit: Overview. In: Reference Guide to English Literature" (1991), St. James Press