조선중기 도학가의 두보 시 수용 양상 -이황과 이이를 중심으로-

Abstract

Philosopher Lee Hwang of the middle period of the Joseon Dynasty published 『Guwenqianjijiangjie古文前集講解』 as he had taught 『Gu- wenzhenbaoqianji古文眞寶前集』 to the literati and edited the contents. And in the collection by his followers, Jinlong金隆 and Lidehong李德弘, are the contents they asked questions to Lihuang李滉 about 44 pieces of Dufu杜甫's poems from 『Guwenzhenbaoqianji』. Totally 32 pieces of Dufu's works Lihuang and his followers taught or questioned were comprised in these books. Meanwhile, Lier李珥 published 『Jingyanmiaoxuan精言玅選』 after he had classified Chinese poetry by eight kinds of styles. This book contained 520 poems from the works of Zhuowenjun卓文君 in Han漢 Dynasty to those of Chenyuyi陳與義 in Song宋 Dynasty and also 48 pieces of Dufu's poems were included in it. This study observed the fact that the two philosophers, who are representing korean moral philosophy, had profound understandings about Dufu's poetry and considered the aspects and meanings of the acceptance of his poetry with the esthetic consciousness based on the high philosophical thoughts of the two. Lihuang and Lier went through the process of formulating the system of Zhuxi朱熹's philosophy, Xinglixue性理學 through the arguments with several scholars in the same age and through this process, they learned that literature, ultimately, must help recover the righteousness of the nature by purifying the polluted mind due to human desires. By the way, Lihuang thought most of the Joseon songs as worldly music and composed 「Taoshanshierqu陶山十二曲」 to make people sing the righteousness of nature, but Lier chose elaborate Chinese poetry as good examples, classified them by eight kinds of styles, and published 『Jingyanmiaoxuan』. The reason why the two judged Korean Songs and Chinese Poems with different points of view was the difference of their perspectives about the activism for Li理. Lihuang thought this nation's songs were filled with Qi氣 and came from Renxin人心 mingled with virtue and vice, but Lier considered the Chinese poems given to the world after 『Shijing詩經』 were combined with poems with Daoxin道心 and Renxin. As above-mentioned, the difference of the two philosopher's literary views was completely reflected in the contents of the acceptance of Dubo's poetry. Lihuang, who emphasized the activism of Li理, considered the poems in 『Guwenzhenbaoqianji』 were derived from Renxin and mixed with virtue and vice, and reinterpreted them and thaught his followers to get rid of Renxin and get back moral Daoxin. But Lier, who denied the activism of Li理, considered Dufu's works were mingled with the poems from Renxin and Daoxin, and classified the 40 pieces of poems of Dufu by various styles from "simplicity" to "elegance" and helped the reader control their Renxin. Like this, It is significant that the aspects of the acceptance of Dufu's poetry manifested the characteristics of literature of the mid-Joseon Dynasty, which systemized Zhuxi's Xinglixue, established a new theory, and constructed unprecedented literary esthetics of the moral philosophers.