18세기 산수유기의 轉變 양상 -『東遊記』와 『東遊記實』의 비교-

Abstract

This research studies the aspect of transition of essays on landscapes (Sansuyugi) during the late Joseon Dynasty era in the 17～18thcentury, by comparing two literary works of late Joseon writers:Hong Baek- chang’s Dongyugisil and Kim Chang-hyup’s Dongyugi. From the aspect of sightseeing, Hong Baek-chang criticized safety-emphasizing sightseeing method shown in Dongyugi, and instead proposed endless exploration as an alternative. In addition, the two works show difference on the level of perspectives on sightseeing. Kim Chang-hyup regarded having a sense of beauty through literary refinement and landscape observation as most important. On the other hand, Hong Baek-chang stressed exploring desire, passion, and patience, showing signs of interaction and communication with interest in journeys of the people. On the imagery of landscapes, Kim Chang-hyup placed priority on grasping the changing moment of landscapes and rhetorically expressing its gracefulness with sophistication. In contrast, Hong Baek-chang concerned more on detailed, precise descriptions and systematic delivery of information. Lastly, on the cognition of landscape literature, Kim Chang-hyup underscored brilliant, novel expressions and splendid portrayal, whereas Hong Baek-chang pursued understatements, and vivid descriptions of the journey, written in detail and without exaggeration. Hong Baek-chang, by succeeding the literary success of the 17thcentury essays of landscapes through the travel essay of Kim Chang-hyup, established spirits of exploration, and made exertions in effectively delivering rich anthropogeographical information down to future generations, which he gained through the process of exploration. Moreover, it can be said that compared to how 17th century travel essays focused on enhancing the sense of beauty based on sophistication, early 18th century travel essays paid more attention to including diverse range of voices by communicating with the people.