A Meta-Analytic Review of the Effectiveness of the Science Writing Heuristic Approach on Academic Achievement in Turkey

키워드

참고문헌 (80)

1. "References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-analysis", ~
2. Ardasheva, Y., "Negotiation, embeddedness, and non-threatening learning environments as themes of science and language convergence for English language learners", Studies in Science Education, 51(2), pp.201~249 (2015)
3. Arli, E., "The impacts of argumentation based science inquiry approach on seasonal agricultural worker students’ academic achievement and thinking skills (Argümantasyon Tabanli Bilim Öğrenme Yaklaşiminin (ATBO) Mevsimlik Tarim İşçisi Konumundaki Dezavantajli Öğrencilerin Akademik Başarilari ve Düşünme Becerilerine Etkisi)", Master, pp.2014
4. Asterhan, C. S., "Argumentation for learning : Well-trodden paths and unexplored territories", Educational Psychologist, 51(2), pp.164~187 (2016)
5. "Bae, Y.", National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), ~ (2018)
6. Bae, Y., "Developing latent constructs of dialogic interaction to examine the epistemic climate : Rasch modeling", School Science and Mathematics, 121(3), pp.164~174 (2021)
7. Bangert-Drowns, R., "The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement : A meta-analysis", Review of Educational Research, 74(1), pp.29~58 (2004)
8. Banks, G. C., "Publication bias : A call for improved meta-analytic practice in the organizational sciences", International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20(2), pp.182~196 (2012)
9. Bayraktar, S., "A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in science education", Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(2), pp.173~188 (2001)
10. Bendixen, L. D., "Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice" (2010), Cambridge University Press
11. Bergstrom, J. C., "Using meta-analysis for benefits transfer: Theory and practice", Ecological Economics, 60(2), pp.351~360 (2006)
12. Borenstein, M., "Introduction to meta-analysis" (2011), John Wiley & Sons
13. Bransford, J. D., "How people learn(Vol. 11)" (2000), National academy press
14. Garvin Brod, "Generative Learning: Which Strategies for What Age?", Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), pp.1295~1318 (2021), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
15. Buehl, M. M., "Handbook of epistemic cognition", pp.247~264 (2016), Taylor and Francis Inc
16. Burr, J. E., "Personal epistemology and theory of mind: Deciphering young children’s beliefs about knowledge and knowing", New Ideas in Psychology, 20(2–3), pp.199~224 (2002)
17. Garvin Brod, "Generative Learning: Which Strategies for What Age?", Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), pp.1295~1318 (2021), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
18. Cavagnetto, A. R., "Argument to foster scientific literacy : A review of argument interventions in K–12 science contexts", Review of Educational Research, 80(3), pp.336~371 (2010)
19. Ceylan, C., "Implementing the science writing heuristic approach in science laboratory activities (Fen laboratuvar etkinliklerinde argümantasyon tabanli bilim öğrenme-ATBO yaklasiminin kullanimi)", Master, pp.2010
20. Chanlen, N., "Longitudinal analysis of standardized test scores of students in the science writing heuristic approach", Doctor, pp.2013
21. Chen, Y. -C., "Examining the integration of talk and writing for student knowledge construction through argumentation", Doctor, pp.2011
22. Chen, Y. -C., "Examining elementary students' development of oral and written argumentation practices through argument-based inquiry", Science & Education, 25, pp.277~320 (2016)
23. Cohen, J., "Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences" (1988), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
24. "What is meta-analysis?" (2009)[URL]
25. Dickersin, K., "Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments", pp.75~98 (2005), John Wiley & Sons
26. Egger, M., "Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test", British Medical Journal, 315, pp.629~634 (1997)
27. Engin, M., "Contributions and silence in academic talk: Exploring learner experiences of dialogic interaction", Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 12, pp.78~86 (2017)
28. Erkol, M., "Investigation the effects of the Science Writing Heuristic Approach on science teacher candidates’ physics laboratory achievements (Yaparak yazarak bilim öğrenme yaklaşiminin fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarinin fizik laboratuari başarilarina etkisinin araştirilmasi)", Doctor, pp.2011
29. Erkol, M., "The effect of implementation of science writing heuristic on students’ achievement and attitudes toward laboratory in introductory physics laboratory", Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), pp.2310~2314 (2010)
30. Erol, G., "An evaluation based on exercising the science writing heuristic method and multiple writing activities on the subject of acid and bases (Asit baz konusunun çoklu yazma etkinlikleri ve yaparak yazarak bilim öğrenme metodu kullanilarak öğretilmesinin değerlendirilmesi)", Master, pp.2010
31. Feucht, F. C., "Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice", pp.55~93 (2010), Cambridge University Press
32. Fulmer, G. W., "Development of a questionnaire on teachers' knowledge of language as an epistemic tool", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(4), pp.459~490 (2021)[DOI]
33. Gencoglan, D. M., "The effects of argumentation based science learning approach based on authentic case studies on the success, attitude and scientific process skills of 8th grade students in the “acids and bases” Lesson (Otantik örnek olay destekli argümantasyon tabanli bilim öğrenme yaklaşiminin 8. sinif öğrencilerininin “asitler ve bazlar” konusundaki başarilarina, tutum ve bilimsel süreç becerilerine etkisi)", Master, pp.2017
34. Glynn, S. M., "Reading and writing to learn science: Achieving scientific literacy", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), pp.1057~1073 (1994)
35. Guler, C., "The effect of "argumentation based science learning approach" on academic success of science teacher candidates and their opinions about the approach (Fen laboratuvari derslerinde kullanilan “argümantasyon tabanli bilim öğrenme” yaklaşiminin, fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarinin akademik başarilarina etkisi ve yaklaşim hakkindaki görüşleri)", Master, pp.2016
36. Gunel, M., "Analysis of argumentation and questioning patterns in argument-based inquiry classrooms(Argümantasyon tabanlı bilim öğrenme(ATBÖ)yaklaşımının kullanıldığı sınıflarda argümantasyon ve soru yapılarının incelenmesi)", Eğitim ve Bilim, 37(164), pp.316~330 (2012)
37. Hand, B. M., "Science inquiry, argument and language: A case for the science writing heuristic" (2007), Sense Publishers
38. Hand, B., "Exploring the role of writing in science: A 25-year journey", Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 25(3), pp.16~ (2017)
39. Brian Hand, "Does a Knowledge Generation Approach to Learning Benefit Students? A Systematic Review of Research on the Science Writing Heuristic Approach", Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), pp.535~577 (2021), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
40. Hand, B., "Exploring students’ responses to conceptual questions when engaged with planned writing experiences: A study with year 10 science students", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(2), pp.186~210 (2004)
41. Hand, B., "Inquiry investigation", The Science Teacher, 66(4), pp.27~29 (1999)
42. Hand, B., "Aligning teaching to learning : A 3-year study examining the embedding of language and argumentation into elementary science classrooms", International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(5), pp.847~863 (2016)
43. Hand, B., "Improving critical thinking growth for disadvantaged groups within elementary school science : A randomized controlled trial using the Science Writing Heuristic approach", Science Education, 102(4), pp.693~710 (2018)
44. Hedges, L., "Statistical methods for meta-analysis" (1985), Academic Press
45. Hedges, L. V., "Fixed-and random-effects models in meta-analysis", Psychological Methods, 3(4), pp.486~ (1998)
46. Hoaglin, D. C., "Misunderstandings about Q and ‘Cochran's Q test'in meta-analysis", Statistics in Medicine, 35(4), pp.485~495 (2016)
47. Hosseini, V. M., "Interventions for reducing fear of childbirth : A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials", Women and Birth, 31(4), pp.254~262 (2018)
48. Huedo-Medina, T. B., "Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis : Q Statistic or I2 index", Psychological Methods, 11(2), pp.193~206 (2006)
49. Huerta, M., "Writing in science: Why, how, and for whom? A systematic literature review of 20 years of intervention research (1996–2016)", Educational Psychology Review, pp.1~38 (2019)
50. Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. J., "Science education: An international course companion", pp.69~80 (2017), Sense Publishers
51. Karaca, D., "Effect of the use of Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) in general physics laboratory-I lesson on teacher candidates’ achievement and scientific process skills (Yaparak yazarak bilim öğrenmenin (YYBO) genel fizik laboratuari-I dersinde öğretmen adaylarinin akademik başarilarina ve bilimsel süreç becerilerine etkisi)", Master, pp.2011
52. Kelly, G. J., "Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy", pp.61~73 (2011), Routledge
53. Kingir, S., "Using the science writing heuristic approach to promote student understanding in chemical changes and mixtures", Doctor, pp.2011
54. Kingir, S., "Using the science writing heuristic approach to enhance student understanding in chemical change and mixture", Research in Science Education, 43, pp.1645~1663 (2013)
55. Kucuk Demir, B., "The effect of the argumentation based science learning approach on students’ mathematical achievement and skills of creative thinking (Argümantasyon Tabanli Bilim Öğrenme Yaklaşiminin Öğrencilerin Matematik Başarilarina ve Yaratici Düşünme Becerilerine Etkisi)", Doctor, pp.2014
56. Lamb, R., "Computational modeling of the effects of the science writing heuristic on student critical thinking in science using machine learning", Journal of Science Education and Technology, pp.1~15 (2020)
57. Manz, E., "Representing student argumentation as functionally emergent from scientific activity", Review of Educational Research, 85(4), pp.553~590 (2015)
58. McDermott, M. A., "A secondary reanalysis of student perceptions of non-traditional writing tasks over a ten year period", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), pp.518~539 (2010)
59. Ministry of National Education, (2013), MoNE Publishing
60. Ministry of National Education, (2018), MoNE Publishing
61. Morris, S. B., "Estimating effect sizes from pretest-posttest-control group designs", Organizational Research Methods, 11(2), pp.364~386 (2008)
62. Krista R. Muis, "Epistemic climate and epistemic change: Instruction designed to change students' beliefs and learning strategies and improve achievement.", Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), pp.213~225 (2013), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
63. National Research Council, "A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas" (2012), National Academies Press
64. Stephen P. Norris, "How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy", Science Education, 87(2), pp.224~240 (2003), Wiley[DOI]
65. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, "Education at a glance 2017: OECD indicators" (2017), OECD Publishing
66. "R: A language and environment for statistical computing" (2019)[URL]
67. Rees, E. L., "How does peer teaching compare to faculty teaching? A systematic review and meta-analysis", Medical teacher, 38(8), pp.829~837 (2016)
68. Rothstein, H. R., "Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments" (2005), John Wiley & Sons Ltd
69. Sahin, E., "The effect of argumentation based science learning approach (ABSL) on academic success, metacognition and critical thinking skills of gifted students (Argümantasyon Tabanlı Bilim Öğrenme Yaklasımının (ATBÖ) Üstün Yetenekli Öğrencilerin Akademik Basarılarına, Üstbilis ve Elestirel Düsünme Becerilerine Etkisi)", Doctor, pp.2016
70. Schwarzer, G., "Meta-analysis with R" (2015), Springer
71. Philip Sedgwick, "How to read a funnel plot in a meta-analysis", BMJ, pp.h4718~ (2015), BMJ[DOI]
72. Sterne, J. A., "Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments", pp.75~98 (2005), John Wiley & Sons
73. Tucel, S. T., "Exploring the effects of science writing heuristic (SWH) approach on the eight grade students’ achievement, metacognition and epistemological beliefs", Master, pp.2016
74. Ulu, C., "Effects of the argumentation based inquiry approach on students’ concept learning levels (Argümantasyon Tabanlı Bilim Öğrenme Yaklaşımına Dayalı Laboratuvar Etkinliklerinin 7. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Kavram Öğrenmelerine Etkisi: Yaşamımızdaki Elektrik Ünitesi)", Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(37), pp.61~75 (2015)
75. Unal, S, "The effect of case study and science writing heuristic based method of learning science about life based approach on teaching environmental subjects in biology course (Biyoloji dersi çevre konularinin öğretiminde yaşam temelli yaklaşima dair örnek olay inceleme ve araştirma sorgulama temelli bilim öğrenme yöntemlerinin etkisi)", Doctor, pp.2016
76. Valentine, J. C., "How many studies do you need? A primer on statistical power for meta-analysis", Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35(2), pp.215~247 (2010)
77. Viechtbauer, W., "Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package", Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), pp.1~48 (2010)
78. Villanueva, M. G., "Science education for students with special needs", Studies in Science Education, 48(2), pp.187~215 (2012)
79. Voutilainen, A., "Conventional vs. e-learning in nursing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis", Nurse Education Today, 50, pp.97~103 (2017)
80. Yaman, F., "Effects of the science writing heuristic approach on the quality of prospective science teachers’ argumentative writing and their understanding of scientific argumentation", International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(3), pp.421~442 (2018)

관련 논문AI추천