영어의 다중의문사 의문문에 관한 고찰
Multiple Wh-questions in English
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In GB framework, covert operations, such as covert raising of wh-in-situ and quantifier raising, had been postulated to explain such phenomena as ACD constructions or scope interactions between the scope bearing elements. However, the recent minimalist approaches may have no way of explaining them in the framework since there is no covert operations in narrow syntax. To solve the problems, I will propose such covert operations be reconsidered and that the wh-in-situ in English be raised overtly to the outer Spec of v*P to satisfy the EPP of v*P and further be raised beyond the position through DISL. By assuming this proposal, we can get several advantages to explain the nature of human languages. First, we reduce the computational burden raised in Chomsky's(2000, 2001) approach to wh-movement constructions. The object shift of wh-element to the outer Spec of v*P causes computational complexity in Chomsky's system since the raising of wh-element is triggered just by the observance of PIC. However, we have no difficulty raising wh-element to the outer Spec of v*P since wh-element must raise to satisfy the EPP of v*P. Second, we can capture the correct reading of multiple-wh-questions eliminating the asymmetry between overt wh-movement and wh-in-situ. Finally, we can derive the object shift property of wh-movement by assuming that the shifted element in the outer Spec of v*P further raises beyond the position through wh-movement or TH/EX.
Abstract
In GB framework, covert operations, such as covert raising of wh-in-situ and quantifier raising, had been postulated to explain such phenomena as ACD constructions or scope interactions between the scope bearing elements. However, the recent minimalist approaches may have no way of explaining them in the framework since there is no covert operations in narrow syntax. To solve the problems, I will propose such covert operations be reconsidered and that the wh-in-situ in English be raised overtly to the outer Spec of v*P to satisfy the EPP of v*P and further be raised beyond the position through DISL. By assuming this proposal, we can get several advantages to explain the nature of human languages. First, we reduce the computational burden raised in Chomsky's(2000, 2001) approach to wh-movement constructions. The object shift of wh-element to the outer Spec of v*P causes computational complexity in Chomsky's system since the raising of wh-element is triggered just by the observance of PIC. However, we have no difficulty raising wh-element to the outer Spec of v*P since wh-element must raise to satisfy the EPP of v*P. Second, we can capture the correct reading of multiple-wh-questions eliminating the asymmetry between overt wh-movement and wh-in-situ. Finally, we can derive the object shift property of wh-movement by assuming that the shifted element in the outer Spec of v*P further raises beyond the position through wh-movement or TH/EX.
참고문헌 (22)
- Baltin,M, "Do Antecedent-contained Deletions Exist", Linguistics Inquiry, 18, pp.579~595 (1987)
- Chomsky,N, "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris Publications
- Chomsky,N, "Barriers" (1986), MIT Press
- Chomsky,N, "A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory in:The View From Building 20: Essays in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger", pp.1~52 (1993), MIT Press
- Chomsky,N, "Bare Phrase Structure", MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, (5) (1994)
- Chomsky,N, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky,N, "Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework:Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik" (2000), MIT Press
- Chomsky,N, "Derivation by Phase in:Ken Hale: A Life in Language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Chomsky,N, "On Phases" (2005), MIT
- Diesing,M, "Indefinites" (1992), MIT Press
- Fox,D, "Economy and Semantic Interpretation" (2000), MIT Press
- Fox,D, "Antecedent Contained Deletion and the Copy Theory of Movement" (2001), Harvard University
- Fox,D., "Extraposition and Scope: A Case for Overt QR", WCCFL, 18, pp.132~144 (1999)
- Hornstein,N, "An Argument for Minimalism: the Case of Antecedent- Contained Deletion", Linguistic Inquiry, 25, pp.455~480 (1994)
- Huang,C-T, "Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar", 박사, pp.1982
- Johnson,K, "How Far Will Quantifier Go:Step by Step: Papers on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.187~210 (2000), MIT Press
- Kennedy,C, "Antecedent-Contained Deletion and the Syntax of quantification", Linguistic Inquiry, 25, pp.662~668 (1997)
- Lebeaux,D, "Language Acquisition and the Form of the Grammar", 박사, pp.1988
- May,R, "Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation" (1985), MIT Press
- Pesetsky,D, "Wh-in-situ: Movement and Unselective binding:The Representation of (In)definiteness", pp.98~129 (1987), MIT Press
- Pesetsky,D, "Phrasal Movement and Its Kin" (2000), MIT Press.
- Reinhart,T, "Wh-in-situ in the Framework of the Minimalist Program" (1993), Tel Aviv University