본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Morphosyntax and Morphothematics of Voice

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

Inversion constructions appear to invert canonical case and agreement patterns in Georgian. However, as long recognized in traditional accounts, the morphological properties of inversion constructions can be assimilated to the default patterns of the language if inversion is treated as a case of ‘thematic demotion’ in which a logical subject is realized as an indirect object. The analysis presented in this paper suggests how a general correspondence-based model of argument structure can capture and extend this traditional insight in a way that clarifies the organization of the Georgian conjugational system. In addition, this type of analysis sheds light on the theoretical status of the dependents that participate in inversion in Georgian. Whereas the ‘logical subjects’ that undergo demotion can be defined in thematic terms, the surface indirect objects that they are realized as constitute a distinctive type of dependent, one which is not reducible to thematically restricted objects

Abstract

Inversion constructions appear to invert canonical case and agreement patterns in Georgian. However, as long recognized in traditional accounts, the morphological properties of inversion constructions can be assimilated to the default patterns of the language if inversion is treated as a case of ‘thematic demotion’ in which a logical subject is realized as an indirect object. The analysis presented in this paper suggests how a general correspondence-based model of argument structure can capture and extend this traditional insight in a way that clarifies the organization of the Georgian conjugational system. In addition, this type of analysis sheds light on the theoretical status of the dependents that participate in inversion in Georgian. Whereas the ‘logical subjects’ that undergo demotion can be defined in thematic terms, the surface indirect objects that they are realized as constitute a distinctive type of dependent, one which is not reducible to thematically restricted objects

참고문헌 (51)

  1. Ackerman, F, "Lexical matters", pp.55~83 (1992), CSLI
  2. Ackerman, F., "Syntagmatic and Paradigmatic Dimensions of Causee Encodings", Linguistics and Philosophy, 22, pp.1~44 (1999)
  3. Ackerman, F., "Proto-properties and Grammatical Encoding: A Correspondence Theory of Argument Selection" (2001), CSLI Publications
  4. Alsina, A., "The Role of Argument Structure in Grammar: Evidence from Romance" (1996), CSLI Publications
  5. Anderson, S, "On Representations in Morphology : Case Marking, Agreement and Inversion in Georgian", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 20, pp.157~218 (1984)
  6. Anderson, S., "A-Morphous Morphology" (1992), Cambridge University Press
  7. Aronson, H., "Georgian: A Reading Grammar" (1990), Columbus
  8. Baker, M., "Passive Arguments Raised", Linguistic Inquiry, 20, pp.219~251 (1989)
  9. Blevins, J, "Markedness and Agreement", Transactions of the Philological Society, 98(2), pp.233~262 (2000)
  10. Blevins, J, "Passives and Impersonals", Journal of Linguistics, 39(3), pp.473~520 (2003)
  11. Blevins, J, "Word-Based Morphology", Journal of Linguistics, 42(3), pp.531~573 (2006)
  12. Bloomfield, L., "Language" (1933), University of Chicago Press
  13. Bresnan, J., "The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations" (1982), MIT Press
  14. Bresnan, J, "The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations", pp.3~86 (1982), MIT Press
  15. Bresnan, J., "Lexical-Functional Syntax" (2001), Blackwell
  16. Bresnan, J., "Lexical-Functional Syntax" (2016), Wiley Blackwell
  17. Bresnan, J., "Locative Inversion in Chicheŵa : A Case Study in Factorization in Grammar", Linguistic Inquiry, 20, pp.1~50 (1989)
  18. Bresnan, J., "Object Asymmetries in Comparative Bantu Syntax", Linguistic Inquiry, 21, pp.147~185 (1990)
  19. Bresnan, J., "Grammatical Relations: A Cross-Theoretical Perspective", pp.45~57 (1990), CSLI Publications
  20. Chomsky, N., "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
  21. Comrie, B, "Syntax and Semantics 8: Grammatical Relations", pp.47~58 (1977), Academic Press
  22. Dalrymple, M., "Lexical Functional Grammar" (2001), Academic Press
  23. Dowty, D, "Thematic Proto-roles and Argument Selection", Language, 67, pp.547~619 (1991)
  24. Dryer, M, "Primary Objects, Secondary Objects and Antidative", Language, 62, pp.808~845 (1986)
  25. Fillmore, C., "Universals in Linguistic Theory", pp.1~88 (1968), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
  26. Harris, A., "Georgian Syntax: A Study in Relational Grammar" (1981), Cambridge University Press
  27. Harris, A, "Studies in Relational Grammar 2", pp.259~291 (1984), University of Chicago Press
  28. Harris, A., "Diachronic Syntax: The Kartvelian Case. Syntax and Semantics 18" (1985), Academic Press
  29. Hewitt, B., "Georgian: A Structural Reference Grammar. London Oriental and African Languages Library" (1995), John Benjamins
  30. Jackendoff, R., "Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar" (1972), MIT Press
  31. Jakobson, R, "Charisteria Guilelmo Mathesio Quinquagenario", pp.74~83 (1932)
  32. Joppen-Hellwig, S., "Verbklassen und Argumentlinking" (2001), Niemeyer
  33. Kaplan, R., "The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations", pp.173~281 (1982), MIT Press
  34. Kibort, A., "The Passive and Passive-like Constructions in English and Polish: A Contrastive Study with Particular Reference to Impersonal Constructions", 박사, pp.2003
  35. Manning, C., "Lexical and Constructional Aspects of Linguistic Explanation", pp.63~78 (1999), CSLI
  36. Perlmutter, D., "Studies in Relational Grammar 1" (1983), University of Chicago Press
  37. Perlmutter, D., "Toward a Universal Characterization of Passivization", Proceedings of the Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp.3~29 (1977)
  38. Perlmutter, D, "Studies in Relational Grammar 1", pp.30~80 (1983), University of Chicago Press
  39. Perlmutter, D., "Studies in Relational Grammar 1", pp.81~128 (1983), University of Chicago Press
  40. Perlmutter, D, "Studies in Relational Grammar 2", pp.81~125 (1984), University of Chicago Press
  41. Shore, S, "On the So-called Finnish Passive", Word, 39(3), pp.151~176 (1988)
  42. Spraunienė, B., "Voice and Argument Structure in Baltic", pp.323~366 (2015), Benjamins
  43. Stump, G., "Inflectional Morphology: A Theory of Paradigm Structure" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  44. Timberlake, A, "The Impersonal Passive in Lithuanian", Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp.508~524 (1982)
  45. Tommola, H, "Trudy po russkoj i slavjanskoj filologii, Lingvistika, Novaja serija", pp.173~187 (1997), Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus
  46. Torn-Leesik, R., "An Investigation of Voice Constructions in Estonian", 박사, pp.2016
  47. Tschenkéli, K., "Einführung in Die Georgische Sprache" (1958), Amirani Verlag
  48. Tuite, K., "Kartvelian Morphosyntax. Volume 12. Lincom Studies in Causasian Linguistics" (1998), Lincom Europa
  49. van Valin, Jr., R, "Semantic Parameters of Split Intransitivity", Language, 66, pp.221~260 (1990)
  50. Wunderlich, D., "The Role of Economy Principles in Linguistic Theory", pp.267~298 (1997), Akademie Verlag
  51. Zaenen, A, "Semantics and the Lexicon", pp.129~159 (1993), Kluwer Academic Publishers

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)