More On The Disjunctive Status of Korean -Cwu
2
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper presents a series of arguments in support of a disjunctive analysis of Korean verbal suffix -cwu. The suffix -cwu can be classified into two subtypes depending on whether it has the ability to introduce a non-core dative argument or not. This paper reviews two representative analyses of these two types of Korean -cwu, Jung(2014) and Tomioka and Kim(2017). Jung(2014) proposes a disjunctive treatment of argument-introducing -cwu and -cwu that fails to license a syntactic argument. In contrast, Tomioka and Kim(2017) attempt at a unified account where both instances of -cwu are linked to a benefactive head. In this paper, I bring to light novel evidence from idioms containing -cwu as well as a malefactive semantic contribution of -cwu. I show that these two sets of data are only compatible with Jung(2014) and not with Tomioka and Kim(2017). Finally, I update Jung(2014) and discuss an additional welcome consequence with regard to the interaction between -cwu and inchoatives with a Theme subject.
Abstract
This paper presents a series of arguments in support of a disjunctive analysis of Korean verbal suffix -cwu. The suffix -cwu can be classified into two subtypes depending on whether it has the ability to introduce a non-core dative argument or not. This paper reviews two representative analyses of these two types of Korean -cwu, Jung(2014) and Tomioka and Kim(2017). Jung(2014) proposes a disjunctive treatment of argument-introducing -cwu and -cwu that fails to license a syntactic argument. In contrast, Tomioka and Kim(2017) attempt at a unified account where both instances of -cwu are linked to a benefactive head. In this paper, I bring to light novel evidence from idioms containing -cwu as well as a malefactive semantic contribution of -cwu. I show that these two sets of data are only compatible with Jung(2014) and not with Tomioka and Kim(2017). Finally, I update Jung(2014) and discuss an additional welcome consequence with regard to the interaction between -cwu and inchoatives with a Theme subject.
참고문헌 (19)
- Embick, D., "The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces", pp.289~324 (2007), Oxford University Press
- Heidi Harley, "External arguments and the Mirror Principle: On the distinctness of Voice and v", Lingua, 125, pp.34~57 (2013), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Jung, H. K., "On the Syntax of Applicative and Causative Constructions", Ph. D., pp.2014
- Key, G, "The Morphosyntax of the Turkish Causative Construction", Ph. D., pp.2013
- 김형배, "사동과 피동표현 숙어의 고정성에 관한 연구", 한민족문화연구, (16), pp.1~28 (2005), 한민족문화학회
- Kratzer, A, "Functional Projections", pp.103~130 (1994), GLSA
- Kratzer, A, "Phrase Structure and the Lexicon", pp.109~137 (1996), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Marantz, A, "On the Nature of Grammatical Relations" (1984), MIT Press
- Marantz, A., "Words", Paper Presented at the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 20 (2001), University of Southern California, United States of America
- Korean Linguistics 4, "Japanese", pp.1994, Shibatani, M
- Shibatani, M, "Grammatical Constructions: their Form and Meaning", pp.157~194 (1996), Clarendon Press
- Oh, E. J., "Reality Exploration and Discovery: Pattern Interaction in Language and Life", pp.185~212 (2010), CSLI Publications
- Pylkkänen, L, "Introducing Arguments" (2008), MIT Press
- Schildmier S. M., "Systematic Flexibility in Verb-Object Idioms", Paper Presented at The 8th Brussels Conference on Generative Linguistics: The Grammar of Idioms (2015)
- Song, J. J, "Benefactives and Malefactives: Typological Perspectives and Case Studies", pp.393~418 (2010), John Benjamins
- Satoshi Tomioka, "The give-type benefactive constructions in Korean and Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 26(3), pp.233~257 (2017), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Tubino, B. M, "Contrasting Causatives: A Minimalist Approach" (2011), John Benjamins
- Wood, J., "The Verbal Domain", pp.255~278 (2017), Oxford University Press
- Korean Linguistics 6, "Japanese", pp.1997, You, S. H