본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Korean First Phase Syntax as Non-Voice-bundling

1

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This paper investigates the question of whether Korean possesses twodistinct syntactic heads for v and Voice (i.e., non-Voice-bundling) or theyare bundled into a single syntactic head (i.e., Voice-bundling). Thediagnostic provided by Pylkkänen (2002; 2008) favors the former, whilethat offered in Tubino Blanco (2011) and Harley (2013) suggests thelatter. In this study, I argue that in Korean the verbalizing layer (i.e., vP)is separated from the external-argument-introducing layer (i.e., VoiceP),based on the ambiguous syntactic behaviors exhibited by the HIconstruction as an inchoative and as a passive. That the derivation of theverb structure involving the HI suffix can either represent a structure atthe vP level or project an additional VoiceP motivates a classification ofKorean as a non-Voice-bundling language. The inchoative/passiveambiguity of the HI construction is ascribed to the interplay of theteleological capabilities of the participating arguments. The predictabilityof the previous diagnostics for non-Voice-budling is evaluated and theirrelationship with the newly proposed diagnostics is considered.

Abstract

This paper investigates the question of whether Korean possesses twodistinct syntactic heads for v and Voice (i.e., non-Voice-bundling) or theyare bundled into a single syntactic head (i.e., Voice-bundling). Thediagnostic provided by Pylkkänen (2002; 2008) favors the former, whilethat offered in Tubino Blanco (2011) and Harley (2013) suggests thelatter. In this study, I argue that in Korean the verbalizing layer (i.e., vP)is separated from the external-argument-introducing layer (i.e., VoiceP),based on the ambiguous syntactic behaviors exhibited by the HIconstruction as an inchoative and as a passive. That the derivation of theverb structure involving the HI suffix can either represent a structure atthe vP level or project an additional VoiceP motivates a classification ofKorean as a non-Voice-bundling language. The inchoative/passiveambiguity of the HI construction is ascribed to the interplay of theteleological capabilities of the participating arguments. The predictabilityof the previous diagnostics for non-Voice-budling is evaluated and theirrelationship with the newly proposed diagnostics is considered.

참고문헌 (47)

  1. Alexiadou, Artemis, "Phases of interpretation", pp.187~211 (2006), Mouton de Gruyter
  2. Arad, Maya, "Roots and patterns: Hebrew morphosyntax" (2005), Springer
  3. Bhatt, Rajesh, "The Blackwell companion to syntax, Volume 2", pp.558~588 (2006), Blackwell Publishing
  4. Brousseau, Anne-Marie, "A non-unified analysis of agentive verbs", Proceedings of WCCFL, 10, pp.53~64 (1991), CSLI Publications
  5. Bruening, Benjamin, "By phrases in passives and nominals", Syntax, 16, pp.1~41 (2013)
  6. Chomsky, Noam, "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
  7. Coon, Jessica, "Transitivity in Chol: A New Argument for the Split-VP Hypothesis", Proceedings of NELS, 41 (2011)
  8. Cuervo, María Cristina, "Datives at large", 박사, pp.2003
  9. Embick, David, "The unaccusativity puzzle", pp.137~158 (2004)
  10. Folli, Raffaella, "Teleology and animacy in external arguments", Lingua, 118, pp.190~202 (2008)
  11. Hale, Kenneth, "The view from building 20: A Festschrift for Sylvain Bromberger", pp.53~108 (1993), MIT
  12. Halle, Morris, "The view from building 20: A Festschrift for Sylvain Bromberger", pp.111~176 (1993), MIT
  13. Harley, Heidi, "Subjects, events and licensing", 박사, pp.1995
  14. Harley, Heidi, "The bipartite structure of verbs cross-linguistically, or, Why Mary can't exhibit John her paintings", Conferências do V Congresso Internacional da Associação Brasileira de Lingüística, pp.45~84 (2008), ABRALIN and FALE[DOI]
  15. Harley, Heidi, "Handbook of Japanese linguistics", pp.20~53 (2008), OUP
  16. Harley, Heidi, "External arguments and the mirror principle: on the distinctness of Voice and v", Lingua, 28, pp.34~57 (2013)
  17. Harley, Heidi, "On the identity of roots", Theoretical Linguistics
  18. Harley, Heidi, "The lexicon-encyclopedia interface", pp.349~374 (2000), Elsevier
  19. Hong, Ki-Sun, "Argument selection and case marking in Korean", 박사, pp.1991
  20. Voice and transitivity as functional projections in Yaqui. In The projection of arguments: lexical and compositional factors, "Jelinek, Eloise", Stanford University, 177~206 (1998)
  21. Jung, Hyun Kyoung, "In Prep. On applicatives and causatives", 박사
  22. Key, Gregory, "The morphosyntax of the Turkish causative construction", 박사, pp.2013
  23. 김형배, "사동과 피동표현 숙어의 고정성에 관한 연구", 한민족문화연구, 16(16), pp.1~28 (2005), 한민족문화학회
  24. Kim, Kyumin, "High applicatives in Korean causatives and passives", Lingua, 121, pp.487~510 (2011)
  25. Kim, Soowon, "Harvard studies in Korean linguistics Vol. 5", pp.368~378 (1993)
  26. Koontz-Garboden, Andrew, "Anticausativization", Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 27, pp.77~138 (2009)
  27. Kratzer, Angelika, "Phrase structure and the lexicon", pp.109~137 (1996), Kluwer Academic Publishers
  28. Landau, Idan, "The explicit syntax of implicit arguments", Linguistic Inquiry, 41, pp.357~338 (2010)
  29. Levin, Beth, "Unaccusativity" (1995), MIT Press
  30. MacDonald, Jonathan E, "The syntax of inner aspect", 박사, pp.2006
  31. MacDonald, Jonathan E., "Domain of aspectual interpretation", Linguistic Inquiry, 39, pp.128~147 (2008)
  32. Marantz, Alec, "No escape from syntax. Don't try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon", Proceedings of the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium, pp.201~225 (1997)
  33. Marantz, Alec, "Roots: the universality of root and pattern morphology", Paper presented at the conferences on Afro-Asiatic languages (2000), University of Paris VII
  34. Miyagawa, Shigeru, "Syntax and Semantics 22" (1989), Academic Press
  35. Miyagawa, Shigeru, "Blocking and causatives: unexpected competition across derivations", Proceedings of the Arizona Linguistics Circle, 4 (2011)
  36. Oehrle, Richard, "Adversity", Proceedings of the Arizona Conference on Japanese Linguistics, pp.163~187 (1981), University of Arizona, University of Arizona Linguistics Circle
  37. Park, Jeong-Woon, "Morphological causatives in Korean: problems in grammatical polysemy and constructional relations", 박사, pp.1994
  38. Korean Lingustics 12, "Japanese", pp.2003, Park, Sang Doh
  39. Pylkkänen, Liina, "Introducing arguments", 박사, pp.2002
  40. Pylkkänen, Liina, "Introducing arguments" (2008), MIT Press
  41. Ramchand, Gillian Catriona, "Verb meaning and the lexicon" (2008), MIT Press
  42. Roeper, Thomas, "Implicit arguments and the head-complement relation", Linguistic Inquiry, 18, pp.267~310 (1987)
  43. Schäfer, Florian, "Two types of external argument licensing – the case of causers", Studia Linguistica, 66, pp.128~180 (2012)
  44. Son, Minjeong, "Causation and syntactic decomposition of events", 박사, pp.2006
  45. Takehisa, Tomokazu, "Causatives, inchoatives, and idioms in Japanese", Paper presented at the Little v Workshop (2013), Leiden University
  46. Philadelphia : John Benjamins, "Causatives in Minimalism. Amsterdam", pp.2011, Tubino Blanco, Mercedes
  47. Van Voorst, Jan, "The semantic structure of causative constructions", Studies in Language, 19, pp.489~523 (1995)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)