영어 형용사 ‘hard’와 한국어 대응표현 ‘단단하다’에 대한 어휘유형론적 연구
A Lexical Typological Study on the English Adjective ‘hard’ and its Korean Corresponding Expression ‘Dandanhada’
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study analyzes and compares the English adjective ‘hard’ and its Korean corresponding expression ‘Dandanhada’ based on the Lexical Typology (François, 2008) which presents the idea of colexification. The term colexification can be used when two functionally distinct senses in a given language associate themselves with the same lexical form. This research focuses on the senses of HARD and compares each language with how it colexifies with the other and also includes semantic maps of the adjectives sorted by the senses of HARD. The outcomes are as follows; HARD has three senses, {not weak}, {not easy} and {not soft}, and each sense is divided into smaller semantic areas according to the types of noun collocations. For instance, {not weak} has four areas; <human>, <substance>, <degree> and <foundation>, {not easy} has two; <”to handle”> and <”to endure”>, {not soft} has two; <surface> and <attitude>. The results from the comparison are as follows; English has all three senses while Korean has only one sense, {not weak}. Also, there are some senses which do not colexify in English and Korean within the sense of {not weak}; English doesn’t include <human> and <foundation> in the sense of {not weak}.
Abstract
This study analyzes and compares the English adjective ‘hard’ and its Korean corresponding expression ‘Dandanhada’ based on the Lexical Typology (François, 2008) which presents the idea of colexification. The term colexification can be used when two functionally distinct senses in a given language associate themselves with the same lexical form. This research focuses on the senses of HARD and compares each language with how it colexifies with the other and also includes semantic maps of the adjectives sorted by the senses of HARD. The outcomes are as follows; HARD has three senses, {not weak}, {not easy} and {not soft}, and each sense is divided into smaller semantic areas according to the types of noun collocations. For instance, {not weak} has four areas; <human>, <substance>, <degree> and <foundation>, {not easy} has two; <”to handle”> and <”to endure”>, {not soft} has two; <surface> and <attitude>. The results from the comparison are as follows; English has all three senses while Korean has only one sense, {not weak}. Also, there are some senses which do not colexify in English and Korean within the sense of {not weak}; English doesn’t include <human> and <foundation> in the sense of {not weak}.
참고문헌 (13)
- 김은일, "다의어 동사 ‘open’과 ‘열다’에 대한 어휘유형론적 접근", 현대문법연구, (91), pp.167~187 (2016), 현대문법학회[DOI]
- 김은일, "He Won his Wife in a Card Game: WIN의 의미지도", 새한영어영문학, 59(4), pp.173~196 (2017), 새한영어영문학회[DOI]
- 박진호, "언어유형론이 한국어 문법 연구에 계시하는 것들", 일어일문학연구, 94(1), pp.3~27 (2015), 한국일어일문학회[DOI]
- 엄영임, "영어 형용사 hard, heavy, strong 사용에 관한 코퍼스 기반 연구 (A Corpus-Based Study of the Use of the English Adjectives Hard, Heavy, and Strong)", 석사, pp.2016
- 이기동, "이기동의 영어 형용사 연구(BASIC) (English Adjectives)" (2015), 교문사
- 정연창, "영어 형용사 ‘difficult’와 ‘hard’의 사용에 대한 코퍼스 기반 연구와 시사점", 현대문법연구, (88), pp.19~45 (2016), 현대문법학회[DOI]
- 정희란, "동사 ‘break’와 ‘깨다’의 어휘 의미지도", 인문사회과학연구, 20(3), pp.285~310 (2019), 인문사회과학연구소[DOI]
- François, A, "From polysemy to Semantic Change", pp.163~215 (2008), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Geeraerts, D, "Vagueness’s Puzzles, Polysemy’s Vagaries", Cognitive Linguistics, 4, pp.223~272 (1993)
- Haspelmath, M, "The New Psychology of Language 2", pp.211~243 (2003), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers
- Langacker, R. W, "Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol Ⅱ: Descriptive Application" (1991), Stanford University Press
- Nerlich, B., "Polysemy: Flexible Patterns of Meaning in Mind and Language" (2003), Mouton de Gruyter
- Riemer, N, "The Semantics of Polysemy: Reading Meaning in English and Warlpiri" (2005), Mouton de Gruyter