부가어조건과 대병합
Notes on Adjunct Condition and MERGE
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper, we will suggest that the MERGE-based system in Chomsky (2019a,b,c) and Chomsky et al. (2019) can successfully account for Adjunct Condition and Anti-Adjunct Condition, assuming the following conditions. First, adjuncts can enter into Pair-MERGE relation with the matrix clause. Second, while wh-phrase in the adjunct with tense effect can be moved to the edge position of adjunct CP under the Phase Impenetrability Condition, wh-phrase in the adjunct without tense effect remains in situ. In this respect, we will consider that the adjunct with tense effect violates the Determinacy Principle, since its workspace involves two copies and thus causes the ambiguous rule application. However, the adjunct without tense effect does not violate the Determinacy Principle, since its workspace involves just one copy, which does not cause the ambiguous rule application. Therefore, we can argue that our analysis of Adjunct Condition and Anti-Adjunct Condition can give an explanatory power to the Minimalist Theory
Abstract
In this paper, we will suggest that the MERGE-based system in Chomsky (2019a,b,c) and Chomsky et al. (2019) can successfully account for Adjunct Condition and Anti-Adjunct Condition, assuming the following conditions. First, adjuncts can enter into Pair-MERGE relation with the matrix clause. Second, while wh-phrase in the adjunct with tense effect can be moved to the edge position of adjunct CP under the Phase Impenetrability Condition, wh-phrase in the adjunct without tense effect remains in situ. In this respect, we will consider that the adjunct with tense effect violates the Determinacy Principle, since its workspace involves two copies and thus causes the ambiguous rule application. However, the adjunct without tense effect does not violate the Determinacy Principle, since its workspace involves just one copy, which does not cause the ambiguous rule application. Therefore, we can argue that our analysis of Adjunct Condition and Anti-Adjunct Condition can give an explanatory power to the Minimalist Theory
참고문헌 (27)
- Belletti, A, "The Syntax of ‘ne’: Some Theoretical Implications", The Linguistic Review, 1, pp.117~154 (1981)
- Boeckx, C, "Syntactic Islands" (2012), Cambridge University Press
- Borgonovo, C, "Transparent Adjuncts", Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 2000, pp.45, 199~224
- Chomsky, N, "Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding" (1982), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N, "Structures and Beyond", pp.104~131 (2004), Oxford University Press
- Chomsky, N, "Problems of Projections", Lingua, 130, pp.33~49 (2013)
- Chomsky, N, "Some Puzzling Foundational Issues: The Reading Program", Catalan Journal of Linguistics, pp.263~285 (2019)
- Chomsky, N, "Fundamental Issues in Linguistics", MIT Lectures, ~ (2019)
- Chomsky, N, "UCLA Lectures", ~ (2019)
- Chomsky, N., "Generative Grammar and the Faculty of Language: Insights, Questions, and Challenges", Catalan Journal of Linguistics, pp.229~261 (2019)
- Cinque, G., "Types of A'-dependencies" (1990), MIT Press
- Fábregas, A, "Extraction from Gerunds and the Internal Syntax of Verbs", Linguistics, 54, pp.1307~1354 (2016)
- Gallego, Á. J., "Phase theory" (2010), John Benjamins
- Hornstein, N, "Adjunction, Labeling, and Bare Phrase Structure", Biolinguistics, 2(1), pp.57~86 (2008)
- Kayne, R., "The Antisymmetry of Syntax" (1994), MIT Press
- 이원빈, "Adjunct Condition Effects in English Revisited", 새한영어영문학, 54(2), pp.287~306 (2012), 새한영어영문학회[DOI]
- Lebeaux, D, "Language Acquisition and the Form of Grammar", 박사, pp.1988
- Manzini, M., "Locality: A Theory and Some of Its Empirical Consequences" (1992), MIT Press
- Nakashima, T., "Adjuncts and Determinacy of Rules", Paper Presented at the Workshop in ELSJ 10th International Spring Forum (2018)
- Narita, H., "Phasing in Full Interpretation", 박사, pp.2011
- Omune, J, "Reformulating Pair-Merge, Inheritance and Valuation", 박사, pp.2017
- Oseki, Y., "Eliminating Pair-Merge", Proceedings of the 32nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, pp.303~312 (2015)
- Rackowski, A, "Phase edge and Extraction: A Tagalog Case Study", Linguistic Inquiry, 36(4), pp.565~599 (2005)
- Stepanov, A, "The End of CED? Minimalism and Extraction Domains", Syntax, 10(1), pp.80~126 (2007)
- Truswell, R., "Events, Phrases and Questions" (2011), Oxford University Press
- Takahashi, D, "Minimality of Movement", 박사, pp.1994
- Uriagereka, J, "Working Minimalism", pp.251~282 (1999), MIT Press