명사류의 (비)해석성 일치 자질이 재귀대명사 습득에 미치는 영향
The Effect of the (Un)interpretable Agreement Feature of Nominals on the Acquisition of Reflexive Pronouns
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
One of the most common errors that the Korean speakers make in learning L2 anaphors is that they allow long-distance binding in English where anaphoric binding is restricted mostly to a local relation. It has been assumed that these errors result from the transfer of L1's rather free remote binding to L2. In this paper, I explore the question of what is exactly transferred in L2 learning of binding within the minimalist framework of syntax in Lasnik (2001) and Chomsky (2002). This paper suggests that long-distance binding is possible by an uninterpretable feature which activates Agree between a reflexive pronoun and its remote antecedent. For this, it is proposed that the number-feature of Korean nominals can be uninterpretable, whereas that of English ones is not. This is supported by the evidence in Korean that the distinction between many and much is not clear, and that the plural marker -tul is deleted.
참고문헌 (32)
- Aoun, J, "Minimality, Reconstruction, and PF-Movement", 29, pp.569~598 (1998)
- Bennett, S, "Morphological status of reflexives in second language acquisition" (1998)
- Boeck, C, "Head-ing toward PF", 32, pp.345~355 (2001)
- origin, "Knowledge of language" (1985)
- Chomsky, N, "Derivation by phase", 15 (2002), MIT Press
- Cole, "Principles and parameters of long distance reflexives", pp.1~22 (1990)
- Finer, "Binding parameters in second language aquisition" (1991)
- Hawk, R, "Second Language Syntax" (2001), Blackwell
- A, "LF-Movement of Pronouns and Anti-Subject Orientation", pp.557~594 (1992)
- Second Language Acquisition 6, "A study of the L2 acquisition of English reflexives", pp.60~85 (1990)
- Holmberg, A, "Remarks on Holmberg's Generalization:Essays of Generative Syntax" (1999)
- Holmberg, A, "Scandinavian Stylistic Fronting", 31, pp.445~483 (2000)
- Hong, Y, "Multiple subject constructions and checking", 10 (2000)
- Hong, Y, "Uninterpretable plural marker '-tul' handout distributed at the conference of the Korean Circle of Generative Grammar." (2003)
- Huang, "University of California-Irvine" (1989)
- LI 22, "The LF Representation of Anaphors", pp.287~314 (1991)
- Kim, Y, "A non-spurious account of 'Spurious Korean plurals" (2002), ms. Stanford University
- Koizumi, "Papers on Case and agreement I", pp.99~18 148 (1993)
- Lasnik, H., "A note on pseudogapping" In MITWPL 27, Papers on minimalist syntax", pp.143~163 (1995), MIT Press
- Lasnik, H, "A Note on the EPP", 32, pp.356~362 (2001)
- Lebeaux, D, "A distributional difference between reciprocals and reflexives", pp.723~730 (1983)
- Lee, H, "Plural coping in Korean", 3, pp.513~528 (1991)
- Lee, S, "Feature movement in Korean control constructions", 11, pp.673~682 (1998), University of Hawaii
- Ochi, M, "Some consequences of Attract F", 109, pp.81~107 (1999)
- Park, "A minimalist approach to plural marker licensing in Korean" (1993), MIT Press
- Park, S, "EPP and (Un)interpretability", 9 (1999)
- "Coordination: the same size fits well", 46 (2004), MIT Press
- "On the nature of the reflexivization cycle", pp.483~17 499 (1987)
- "long distance reflexives without movement", pp.671~680 (1992)
- "Acquisition of the Japanese Reflexive zibun and movement of anaphors in Logical Form", 11, pp.206~234 (1995)
- "Multiple Feature-Checking: A theory of grammatical function splitting" (1996)
- "The development of lexical anaphors and pronouns Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 24", pp.138~149 (1985)