Processing and Language Acquisition: Reflexive Pronouns in English and Korean
2
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper offers a new perspective on the interpretation of reflexive pronouns in Korean and English. Whereas most previous work has assumed a parameter-based grammatical contrast, I propose that the two languages differ from each other in terms of how they go about processing referential dependencies: whereas English relies primarily on sentence-based structural processing, Korean has recourse to a pragmatically oriented procedure. Evidence from language acquisition, in the form of on-line processing by children, is used to construct a new picture of how knowledge of reflexive pronouns unfolds in the course of development.
Abstract
This paper offers a new perspective on the interpretation of reflexive pronouns in Korean and English. Whereas most previous work has assumed a parameter-based grammatical contrast, I propose that the two languages differ from each other in terms of how they go about processing referential dependencies: whereas English relies primarily on sentence-based structural processing, Korean has recourse to a pragmatically oriented procedure. Evidence from language acquisition, in the form of on-line processing by children, is used to construct a new picture of how knowledge of reflexive pronouns unfolds in the course of development.
참고문헌 (30)
- Berwick, Robert, "Poverty of the stimulus revisited", Cognitive Science, 35, pp.1207~1242 (2011)
- Chien, Yu-Chin, "Children’s knowledge of locality conditions in binding as evidence for the modularity of syntax and pragmatics", Language Acquisition, 1, pp.225~295 (1990)
- 조준모, "The Effect of UG in the L2 Acquisition of Long-Distance Binding", 생성문법연구, 16(2), pp.193~209 (2006), 한국생성문법학회
- Cho, SookWhan, "Issues in the Structure and Acquisition of Korean Anaphora", 박사, pp.1985
- Cho, SookWhan, "Parameter, subset principle, and acquisition of the Korean reflexive pronoun", Proceedings for the Cognitive Science Conference, pp.296~301 (1989)
- Cho, SookWhan, "Acquisition of Korean reflexives, In The Handbook of East Asian Linguistics. Vol. III: Korean", pp.150~159 (2009)
- Chomsky, Noam, "Three factors in language design", Linguistic Inquiry, 36, pp.1~22 (2005)
- Clackson, Kaili, "Children’s processing of reflexives and pronouns in English : Evidence from eye-movements during listening", Journal of Memory and Language, 65, pp.128~144 (2011)
- Finer, Daniel, "Second language acquisition of reflexive binding", Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society, 16, pp.154~168 (1986)
- Guasti, Maria Teresa, "Language Acquisition: The Growth of Grammar" (2002), MIT Press
- Han, Chung-hye, "An experimental study of the grammatical status of caki in Korean", Japanese, 2010, pp.19, 81~94
- Han, Chung-hye, "Semantic binding of long-distance anaphor caki in Korean", Language
- Hawkins, John, "Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars" (2004), Oxford University Press
- Jespersen, Otto, "Essentials of English Grammar" (1933), Allen & Unwin
- Kang, Beom-mo, "Unbounded reflexives", Linguistics and Philosophy, 11, pp.415~456 (1988)
- Kim, Ji-Hye, "Long-distance bound local anaphors in Korean: An empirical study of the Korean anaphor caki-casin", Lingua, 119, pp.733~755 (2009)
- Kim, Soo-Yeon, "Dependencies: A Study of Anaphoricity and Scrambling", 박사, pp.1996
- Kim, Saeromi, "L1 acquisition of binding principles A and B in Korean", Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, pp.103~108 (2011)
- Lee, H., "acquisition of reflexives and pronouns in Korean: From a cross-linguistic perspective", Paper presented at the 12th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (1987)
- Lee, Kum-Young, "The role of pragmatics in reflexive interpretation by Korean learners of English", Selected publications of the 2007 Second Language Research Forum, pp.97~112 (2008), Cascadilla
- O’Grady, William, "The interpretation of Korean anaphora", Language, 63, pp.251~277 (1987)
- O’Grady, William, "Syntactic Carpentry: An Emergentist Approach to Syntax" (2005), Erlbaum
- O’Grady, William, "The emergentist program", Lingua, 118, pp.447~464 (2008)
- O’Grady, William, "Three factors in the design and acquisition of language", Wiley Interdisciplinary Review : Cognitive Science, 3, pp.493~499 (2012)
- O’Grady, William, "The illusion of language acquisition" (2013), Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism
- Pollard, Carl, "Anaphora in English and the scope of binding theory", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 23, pp.261~303 (1992)
- Reinhart, Tanya, "Anaphors and logophors: An argument structure perspective, In Long-distance Anaphora", pp.283~321 (1991), Cambridge University Press
- Reuland, Eric, "Anaphora and Language Design" (2011), MIT Press
- Sekerina, Irina, "How do adults and children process referentially ambiguous pronouns?", Journal of Child Language, 31, pp.123~152 (2004)
- Wexler, Kenneth, "Parameters and learnability in binding theory, In Parameter Setting", pp.41~76 (1987), Reidel