문어 텍스트와 구어 텍스트의 담화 표지와 텍스트 구조 비교 연구
On the Comparative Study of Discourse Markers and Text Structure between Literal and Oral Text
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study is focused on the comparative analyzing between the literary expression and the oral expression, but those two texts belongs to same prototype. One of the research material of this study is Oakdanchoonjeon which is a Korean classical novel, the other is a Lee Hyunryong and Kim Jinhoi which is a Korean oral narration. Firstly discourse markers of two texts were compared. Most of cohesive devices in Oakdanchoonjeon are grammatical, logical and semantical binder. However, in Lee Hyunryong and Kim Jinhoi, pragmatical binder and internal binder are remarkable, like ‘ah, in-ja, mak'. Secondly, two text structures were compared. On the case of literal text, it was focused on the success story of Lee Hyunryong, However, the love story between Oakdanchoon and Lee Hyunryong was focused in the oral text. It shows that a text structure of oral text can be changed by narrative place, time and speaker. Also discourse markers are related to the episodes of text. Especially, using discourse marker as a cohesive device was remarkable in oral text.
Abstract
This study is focused on the comparative analyzing between the literary expression and the oral expression, but those two texts belongs to same prototype. One of the research material of this study is Oakdanchoonjeon which is a Korean classical novel, the other is a Lee Hyunryong and Kim Jinhoi which is a Korean oral narration. Firstly discourse markers of two texts were compared. Most of cohesive devices in Oakdanchoonjeon are grammatical, logical and semantical binder. However, in Lee Hyunryong and Kim Jinhoi, pragmatical binder and internal binder are remarkable, like ‘ah, in-ja, mak'. Secondly, two text structures were compared. On the case of literal text, it was focused on the success story of Lee Hyunryong, However, the love story between Oakdanchoon and Lee Hyunryong was focused in the oral text. It shows that a text structure of oral text can be changed by narrative place, time and speaker. Also discourse markers are related to the episodes of text. Especially, using discourse marker as a cohesive device was remarkable in oral text.
참고문헌 (18)
- 고려대학교 민족문화연구소, "옥단춘전", 연강학술도서 한국고전문학전집, 5 (1993)
- 김진수, "대덕구 구전설화의 담화 표지 연구 1", 인문학연구, 32(2) (2005), 충남대학교 인문과학연구소
- 김진수, "옥단춘전과 대덕구 구전설화 ‘이현룡’과 ‘김진희’의 서사구조 비교 연구", 언어연구, 22(3), pp.29~48 (2007), 한국현대언어학회
- 김향화, "한국어 담화 표지에 대한 연구", 박사, pp.2002
- 나은미, "텍스트의 내용과 접속 표지의 상관관계 연구", 우리어문연구, 27 (2006), 우리어문학회
- 노대규, "한국어의 입말과 글말" (1996), 국학 자료원
- "대덕의 구전설화" (2001), 대덕문화원
- 백설자, "텍스트언어학 입문" (2001), 역락
- 신지연, "국어 간투사의 위상 연구", 국어연구, (8) (1998), 국어 연구회
- 이성만, "텍스트언어학 입문" (1995), 한국문화사
- 이숙의, "담화의 상황성과 화제전환 양상 연구", 석사, pp.2001
- 이정애, "국어화용표지연구" (2002), 월인
- 이한규, "한국어 담화 표지어 ‘그래’의 의미연구", 담화와 인지, 3 (1996), 담화인지 언어학회
- 이해윤, "텍스트 유형별 구조 비교분석 - 수사구조이론을 기반으로", 텍스트언어학, 2(23), pp.231~254 (2007), 한국텍스트언어학회
- 임규홍, "국어 담화 표지 ‘인자’에 대한 연구", 담화와 인지, 2 (1996), 담화인지언어학회
- 전영옥, "한국어 담화 표지의 특징연구", 화법연구, 4 (2002), 한국화법학회
- 전영옥, "구어와 문어의 접속 표현 비교 연구- ‘그런데, -는데’를 중심으로 -", 한말연구, (17), pp.169~194 (2005), 한말연구학회
- 정시호, "텍스트학" (1995), 민음사