본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

韓中 詩經論의 편집비평 연구 -분류와 차서를 중심으로

The Redaction Criticism Study of Korea & China Shikyung-Ron

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

The object of this study is Redaction Criticism of Korea & China Shikyung-Ron. The redaction criticism is used for the criticism method of Bible basically. The character of Shikyung is similar with Bible. Therefore, applying the criticism method of Bible is very useful. The redaction criticism has an interest to the person who redact human's purpose of Shikyung. Shikyung has double structure. The structure of precedence is formed a relation between poetry and poetry. And the structure of subordinated position is inside of the poetry. The critics think that the poetry classification and the order as the precedence structure of Shikyung is meaningful. Thus, they have tried to clarify the meaning of poetry classification and the order. In general, it is known that the redactor of Shikyung is Confucius. So major object of redaction criticism is the redacted purpose of Confucius. But it is a problem that the redacted purpose of Confucius is not clear yet. If Confucius has enumerated the poets in Shikyung simply, its structure could not have the meaning. But the structure of Shikyung is not simple and it seems to be haven some meanings. Although Confucius did not redact it, the clarification of the meaning of Shikyung's structure is valuable to make understand about Shikyung. And it is possible that this meaning is from the redactors or the recognition of researcher who studied the structure of Shikyung. The study of Shikyung-Ron is a Meta-Criticism and needs new paradigm. If analyzing the Shikyung-Ron to various reader's response of the literature, the researches which were regarded as the errors before could be recognised their values. Until now, the studies have been many problems and the study of today's Shikyung or Shikyung-Ron stands for literary approach. But the materials of study's object is builded up logic from the side of the search for truth. Thus the researchers get dazzled by logic of objective materials, and then the researchers denied various translation. Today, it is difficult to approach that we translate and understand ancient time of Shikyung without former ages reference of the result. Therefore, accurate institution about the objective of Shikyung or Shikyung-Ron is needed. Actually, it is almost impossible to grasp the substantial truth of Shikyung which is over 2000 years. Although knowing the substantial truth is difficult, it is possible to approach the truth more if we understand translation method of former ages Shikyung-Ron which has redaction criticism of the Shikyung exactly. Through this study, we could not explain the meaning which are the standard and the order of Shikyung's classification. However it is possible to enhance the value of Shikyung by various translation and meaning structure through research procedure. The modern study which tried to disassemble the structure of Shikyung are contained opening new view and risks at the same time. This is advantageous to show the topic of Shikyung and entire trend. But it has to be bewared that it might extinguish the traditional understand and existing structural meaning. For the future, we do not disregard former redaction criticism which has vagueness. We should recognize the troubles which bring about the relation between the precedence structure & the subordinate structure, and the logical conflict between them. And then, it has to be studied the value by the translation.

Abstract

The object of this study is Redaction Criticism of Korea & China Shikyung-Ron. The redaction criticism is used for the criticism method of Bible basically. The character of Shikyung is similar with Bible. Therefore, applying the criticism method of Bible is very useful. The redaction criticism has an interest to the person who redact human's purpose of Shikyung. Shikyung has double structure. The structure of precedence is formed a relation between poetry and poetry. And the structure of subordinated position is inside of the poetry. The critics think that the poetry classification and the order as the precedence structure of Shikyung is meaningful. Thus, they have tried to clarify the meaning of poetry classification and the order. In general, it is known that the redactor of Shikyung is Confucius. So major object of redaction criticism is the redacted purpose of Confucius. But it is a problem that the redacted purpose of Confucius is not clear yet. If Confucius has enumerated the poets in Shikyung simply, its structure could not have the meaning. But the structure of Shikyung is not simple and it seems to be haven some meanings. Although Confucius did not redact it, the clarification of the meaning of Shikyung's structure is valuable to make understand about Shikyung. And it is possible that this meaning is from the redactors or the recognition of researcher who studied the structure of Shikyung. The study of Shikyung-Ron is a Meta-Criticism and needs new paradigm. If analyzing the Shikyung-Ron to various reader's response of the literature, the researches which were regarded as the errors before could be recognised their values. Until now, the studies have been many problems and the study of today's Shikyung or Shikyung-Ron stands for literary approach. But the materials of study's object is builded up logic from the side of the search for truth. Thus the researchers get dazzled by logic of objective materials, and then the researchers denied various translation. Today, it is difficult to approach that we translate and understand ancient time of Shikyung without former ages reference of the result. Therefore, accurate institution about the objective of Shikyung or Shikyung-Ron is needed. Actually, it is almost impossible to grasp the substantial truth of Shikyung which is over 2000 years. Although knowing the substantial truth is difficult, it is possible to approach the truth more if we understand translation method of former ages Shikyung-Ron which has redaction criticism of the Shikyung exactly. Through this study, we could not explain the meaning which are the standard and the order of Shikyung's classification. However it is possible to enhance the value of Shikyung by various translation and meaning structure through research procedure. The modern study which tried to disassemble the structure of Shikyung are contained opening new view and risks at the same time. This is advantageous to show the topic of Shikyung and entire trend. But it has to be bewared that it might extinguish the traditional understand and existing structural meaning. For the future, we do not disregard former redaction criticism which has vagueness. We should recognize the troubles which bring about the relation between the precedence structure & the subordinate structure, and the logical conflict between them. And then, it has to be studied the value by the translation.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. "한국경학자료집성-시경", 대동문화연구원
  2. "시경", 학민문화사
  3. 金時俊, "毛詩硏究" (1981), 瑞麟文化社
  4. 金興圭, "朝鮮 後期의 詩經論과 詩意識" (1988), 高大民族文化硏究所
  5. 裵普賢, "歐陽修詩本義硏究", 東大圖書公司
  6. 費振剛, "詩經類傳" (2000), 吉林人民出版社
  7. 스티븐헤이넨스, "성서비평방법론과 그 적용" (2003), 대한기독교서회
  8. 劉毓慶, "從經學到文學-明代詩經學史論" (2001), 商務印書館
  9. 오윤숙, "近代 以後 中國《詩經》解釋學의 成果 擧例 分析 ― 〈近代 以後 韓中《詩經》解釋學의 樣相과 成果〉중 中國篇 (2)", 중국어문논역총간, 26(12), pp.3~33 (2004), 중국어문논역학회
  10. 오윤숙, "近代 以後 中國《詩經》解釋學의 成果 擧例 分析 ― 〈近代 以後 韓中《詩經》解釋學의 樣相과 成果〉중 中國篇 (2)", 중국어문논역총간, 12(12), pp.3~33 (2004), 중국어문논역학회
  11. 王宗石, "詩經分類詮釋" (2001), 湖南敎育出版社
  12. 이병찬, "白鳳來 詩經論의 編輯批評的 性格 硏究", 어문연구, 48(48), pp.195~217 (2005), 어문연구학회
  13. 이병찬, "한국 시경론의 비평론적 접근", 어문연구, (46), pp.203~222 (2004), 어문연구학회
  14. 이병찬, "韓·中 詩經論의 問題點과 再認識 ­楚簡本 『詩經』 關聯資料에 根據하여­", 어문연구, 42, pp.177~200 (2003), 어문연구학회
  15. 이병찬, "한국의 시경론 연구", 박사, pp.2001
  16. 이병찬, "韓.中 詩經學 硏究" (2001), 보경문화사
  17. 林慶彰, "詩經硏究論集 一·二" (1976), 學生書局
  18. 林葉蓮, "中國歷代詩經學" (1982), 學生書局
  19. 張樹波, "國風集說 上·下" (1993), 河北人民出版社
  20. 崔錫起, "星湖 李瀷의 學問精神과 詩經學" (1994), 중문출판사
  21. 崔錫起, "白湖 尹鑴의 詩經學", 漢文學硏究, 13 (1998), 계명한문학회
  22. 皮錫瑞, "中國經學史" (1995), 螢雪出版社
  23. 夏傳才, "詩經硏究史槪要" (1982), 中州書畵社
  24. 夏傳才, "思無邪齋詩經論稿" (2000), 學苑出版社
  25. 韓明安, "詩經硏究槪觀" (1988), 黑龍江敎育出版社
  26. 진재교, "沈大允의 國風論-'시경집전변증'을 중심으로", 한문학보, 1, pp.454~465 (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)