On Interpreting Small Clauses in English and Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is concerned with interpreting small clauses in English and Korean and its implications. With the argument that the embedded subject of infinitives and small clauses is raising into the higher clause, based on the assumption that the syntactic configuration of small clauses correlates to their semantic interpretation, which in turn is considered to reflect the discourse/cognitive concepts such as thetic/categorical judgments, I propose that small clauses are a categorical statement and that the obligatory raising of the small clause subject is motivated not just by Case-theoretic reasons but also its need to get interpreted as presuppositional or specific. The advantage of this analysis lies in that it enables us to capture both the clausality or propositionality and the semantic import of the small clause relevant to discourse/cognitive facts
Abstract
This paper is concerned with interpreting small clauses in English and Korean and its implications. With the argument that the embedded subject of infinitives and small clauses is raising into the higher clause, based on the assumption that the syntactic configuration of small clauses correlates to their semantic interpretation, which in turn is considered to reflect the discourse/cognitive concepts such as thetic/categorical judgments, I propose that small clauses are a categorical statement and that the obligatory raising of the small clause subject is motivated not just by Case-theoretic reasons but also its need to get interpreted as presuppositional or specific. The advantage of this analysis lies in that it enables us to capture both the clausality or propositionality and the semantic import of the small clause relevant to discourse/cognitive facts
참고문헌 (33)
- Aarts, B., "Small Clauses in English : The Nonverbal Types" (1992), Mouton de Gruyter
- Allwood, J., "Logic in Linguistics. Cambridge" (1977), Cambridge University Press
- Baker, M., "Lexical Categories" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Burzio, L., "Italian Syntax : A Government-Binding Approach" (1986), Reidel
- Carlson, G., "Reference to Kinds in English.", Ph. D, pp.1977
- Choi, Y. -S., "S’-Deletion vs. Raising : Evidence from Korean", Language Research, 24, pp.169~194 (1988)
- Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Problems of Projection", Lingua, 130, pp.33~49 (2013)
- Diesing, M., "Indefinite" (1992), MIT Press
- Enç, M., "The Semantics of Specificity", Linguistic Inquiry, 22, pp.1~25 (1991)
- Hong, S, "A Note on ‘Raising to Object’ in Small Clauses and Full Clauses", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 19, pp.275~289 (2010)
- Hornstein, N., "Predication and PRO", Language, 63, pp.23~52 (1987)
- Kawai, M., "Raising to Object in Japanese : a Small Clause Analysis", Linguistic Inquiry, 37, pp.329~339 (2006)
- Kayne, R., "The Antisymmetry of Syntax" (1994), MIT Press
- Kitagawa, Y., "Small but Clausal", General Session. CLS 21, pp.210~220 (1985)
- Kratzer, A., "Stage-Level and Individual-Level Predicates" (1988), Umass
- Kuroda, S.-Y., "The Categorical and The Thetic Judgment : Evidence from Japanese Syntax", Foundations of Language, 9, pp.153~185 (1972)
- Kuroda, S. -Y., "Japanese Syntax and Semantics" (1992), Kluwer
- Lasnik, H., "On the Subject of Infinitives", 27th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Part I: The General Session, pp.324~343 (1991)
- Martinich, A. P., "The Philosophy of Language" (1990), Oxford University Press
- Moro, A., "Dynamic Antisymmetry. Cambridge" (2000), MIT Press
- Korean Linguistics 6, "Japanese", pp.1997, Ohta, K
- Postal, P. M., "On Raising : One Rule of English Grammar and Its Theoretical Implications" (1974), MIT Press
- Quine, W. V., "Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes", The Journal of Philosophy, 53, pp.177~187 (1956)
- Radford, A., "Transformational Grammar" (1988), University of Cambridge Press
- Rizzi, L., "The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics", pp.65~97 (1986), Academic Press
- 손광락, "Floating Numeral Quantifiers with Scrambling: A Prosodic Account", 언어, 35(3), pp.659~682 (2010), 한국언어학회
- Stowell, T., "Origins of Phrase Structure", Ph. D., pp.1981
- Stowell, T., "Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar", pp.182~218 (1991), MIT Press
- Williams. E., "Syntax and Semantics 4", pp.249~273 (1975), Academic Press
- Yoon, J., "Raising of Major Arguments in Korean and Japanese", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25, pp.615~653 (2007)
- Yoon, S. -H., "The Mapping Hypothesis Reconsidered", Studies in Generative Grammar, 10, pp.505~536 (2000)
- 윤상헌, "Why do Topic and Contrastive Focus Behave Alike?", 언어과학, 13(1), pp.163~181 (2006), 한국언어과학회