Subject Raising in Korean Redux: Base-generated Left Dislocation
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
I will deal with subject raising of a finite complement clause in Korean. I critically review two proposals which have thus far attracted the most attention: raising for case approach and prolepsis approach. I will show that neither approach provides a satisfactory account for the relevant data. I suggest that the putative accusative case of the subject of the finite complement clause is in fact an instantiation of a topic morpheme, subject to topicalization comparable to left dislocation in English. I hence diverge from the standard assumption in the literature since Choi (1961) that lul is invariably accusative case morpheme. The present proposal has a nontrivial crosslinguistic implication, shedding new light on our understanding of the true nature of so called exceptional case marking constructions in languages typologically akin to Korean.
Abstract
I will deal with subject raising of a finite complement clause in Korean. I critically review two proposals which have thus far attracted the most attention: raising for case approach and prolepsis approach. I will show that neither approach provides a satisfactory account for the relevant data. I suggest that the putative accusative case of the subject of the finite complement clause is in fact an instantiation of a topic morpheme, subject to topicalization comparable to left dislocation in English. I hence diverge from the standard assumption in the literature since Choi (1961) that lul is invariably accusative case morpheme. The present proposal has a nontrivial crosslinguistic implication, shedding new light on our understanding of the true nature of so called exceptional case marking constructions in languages typologically akin to Korean.
참고문헌 (59)
- Alexiadou, A, "Adverb placement,In A case study in antisymmetric syntax" (1997), John Benjamins Publishing
- Abusch, D, "The scope of indefinites", Natural Language Semantics, 2(2), pp.83~135 (1993)
- Aoun, J, "Minimal disjointness", Linguistics, 28(2), pp.189~203 (1990)
- Baltin,M, "A landing site theory of movement rules", Linguistic Inquiry, 13(1), pp.1~38 (1982)
- Blake,B, "Case" (2001), Cambridge University
- Choe. H. S, "Discourse configurational languages", pp.269~334 (1995), Oxford University
- Choi, H. P, "Our grammar" (1961), Yeonsei University
- 최인철, "The Partial Parallelism between Double Nominative Construction and ECM Construction in Korean", 현대문법연구, 53(53), pp.75~101 (2008), 현대문법학회
- 최영식, "Case Alternation in Korean: Case and Beyond", 현대문법연구, 54(54), pp.105~122 (2008), 현대문법학회
- Chomsky, N, "A festschrift for Morris Halle", pp.232~286 (1973), Holt Rinehart and Winston
- Chomsky, N, "Conditions on rules of grammar", Linguistic Analysis, 2, pp.303~351 (1976)
- Chomsky, N, "Formal syntax", pp.71~132 (1977)
- Chomsky, N, "Lectures on government and binding" (1981), Foris
- Chomsky, N, "Barriers" (1986), MIT
- Chomsky, N, "Knowledge of language" (1986), Praeger
- Chomsky, N, "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT
- Dik, S, "Functional grammar" (1978), North Holland Publishing Company
- Farkas, D, "Ways of Scope Taking", pp.183~215 (1997), Kluwer Academic publishers
- Fiengo, R, "Semantic conditions on surface structure", 박사, pp.1974
- Fiengo, R, "On trace theory", Linguistic Inquiry, 8(1), pp.35~61 (1977)
- Gerdts, D, "Korean psych constructions,In Advancement or retreat", the 24th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, pp.155~175 (1988)
- Heine, B, "The oxford handbook of case", pp.458~478 (2009), Oxford University Press
- Hoji, H, "Raising to object, ECM, and the major object in Japanese", Japanese Syntax Workshop (1991)
- Hoji,H, "Major object analysis of the so called raising to object construction in Japanese", Korean and Japanese Syntax and Semantics Workshop (2005)
- Hong, K. S, "Grammatical relations,In A cross theoretical perspective", pp.215~225 (1990)
- Horvath, J, "Aspects of Hungarian syntax and the theory of grammar", 박사, pp.1981
- Horvath, J, "FOCUS in the theory of grammar and the syntax of Hungarian" (1986), Foris
- Horvath,J, "Discourse configurational languages", pp.1~64 (1995), Oxford University Press
- Jesperson, O, "The philosophy of grammar" (1924), The University of Chicago
- Johnson,K, "Clausal gerunds, the ECP, and government", Linguistic Inquiry, 19(4), pp.583~609 (1988)
- Johnson,K, "Object positions", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 9(4), pp.577~636 (1991)
- Kuno,S, "Syntax and semantics", pp.17~49 (1976), Academic
- Lasnik, H, "Working minimalism", pp.189~215 (1999), MIT
- Lasnik, H, "Move α,In conditions on its applications and output" (1992), MIT
- Lasnik, H, "Weakest crossover", Linguistic Inquiry, 22(4), pp.687~720 (1991)
- Lee, J. S, "Case alternation in Korean,In Case minimality", 박사, pp.1992
- Maki, H, "Embedded topicalization in English and Japanese", Lingua, 107, pp.1~14 (1999)
- Marantz, A, "On the nature of grammatical relations" (1984), MIT
- Massam, D, "Case theory and the projection principle", 박사, pp.1985
- Montalbetti,M, "After binding: On the interpretation of pronouns", 박사, pp.1984
- O’Grady,W, "Categories and case,In The sentence structure of Korean" (1991), John Benjamins Publishing Company
- Ouhalla, J, "Parasitic gaps", pp.147~179 (2001), MIT
- Postal, P, "On raising,In One rule of English grammar and its theoretical implications" (1974), MIT
- Postal, P, "Expletive noun phrases in subcategorized positions", Linguistic Inquiry, 19(4), pp.635~670 (1988)
- Postal, P, "Remarks on weak crossover effects", Linguistic Inquiry, 24(3), pp.539~556 (1993)
- Reinhart, T, "Quantifier scope,In how labor is divided between QR and choice functions", Linguistics and Philosophy, 20(4), pp.335~397 (1997)
- Rizzi, L, "Comparative syntax and language acquisition", pp.241~295 (2000), Routledge
- Rochemont, M, "Topic islands and the subjacency parameter", Canadian journal of linguistics, 34, pp.145~170 (1989)
- Rosenbaum, P, "The grammar of English predicate complement constructions" (1967), MIT
- Rouveret, A, "Specifying reference to the subject,In French causatives and conditions on representations", Linguistic Inquiry, 11(1), pp.97~202 (1980)
- Saito, M, "Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications", 박사, pp.1985
- Schütze,C, "On Korean case stacking,In The varied functions of the particles ka and lul", Linguistic Review, 18(3), pp.193~232 (2001)
- Sohn,K.W, "Negative polarity items, scope and economy", 박사, pp.1995
- Takano, Y, "Nominative objects in Japanese complex predicate constructions,In a prolepsis analysis", Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21(4), pp.779~834 (2003)
- Travis,L, "Special Issue on Comparative Germanic Syntax", pp.280~310 (1988)
- Yang, D. W, "the 18th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics", pp.626~639 (1999)
- Yoon, J. M, "ECM and multiple subject constructions in Korean", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, 3, pp.369~381 (1989)
- Yoon, J. M, "The syntax of A Chains,In A typological study of ECM and scrambling", 박사, pp.1991
- Yoon,J.Y, "Korean syntax and generalized X bar theory", 박사, pp.1990