초등영어 핵심성취기준과 읽기능력의 정합성 분석
An Analysis of Correlation between Core Achievement Components of National Curriculum and Reading Competence
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study analyzed Korean elementary school students’ ‘essential components of reading ability achievement in national curriculum’ and the achievement of students’ reading ability and its empirical application to English education in Korea. Participants consists of 117 students: 53 in grade 4, and 64 in grade 6. After pre-testing them in the essential components of national curriculum, the results were compare and analyzed with the results of DIBELS(Dynamic Indicator Basic Early Literacy Skills) Next. The students showed significant achievements, in reading ability, in terms of the index of national curriculum, but these scores equal to the level of reading ability of kindergarten, grade 1, and benchmark scores in DIBELS Next. The study also showed various broad gaps between participants’ reading achievement scores and the benchmark scores. The study suggests the need for specific diagnosis of reading ability index and the development of curriculum-based measurement in order to propose the essential components of reading in national curriculum.
Abstract
This study analyzed Korean elementary school students’ ‘essential components of reading ability achievement in national curriculum’ and the achievement of students’ reading ability and its empirical application to English education in Korea. Participants consists of 117 students: 53 in grade 4, and 64 in grade 6. After pre-testing them in the essential components of national curriculum, the results were compare and analyzed with the results of DIBELS(Dynamic Indicator Basic Early Literacy Skills) Next. The students showed significant achievements, in reading ability, in terms of the index of national curriculum, but these scores equal to the level of reading ability of kindergarten, grade 1, and benchmark scores in DIBELS Next. The study also showed various broad gaps between participants’ reading achievement scores and the benchmark scores. The study suggests the need for specific diagnosis of reading ability index and the development of curriculum-based measurement in order to propose the essential components of reading in national curriculum.
참고문헌 (18)
- 교육부, "2009 개정 교육과정에 따른 초등학교 핵심 성취기준의 이해", 교육부, ~ (2013)
- 김진만, "방과후 수업에서 음운 인식 활동을 통한 영어 읽기 능력 향상 방안", 석사, 초등영어교육, pp.2011
- 박영예, "초등학생들의 초기 읽기 능력과 구두읽기 유창성의 관계", 초등영어교육, 16(2), pp.29~52 (2010), 한국초등영어교육학회
- 부산교육 정책연구 보고서, "부산광역시교육청", ~, pp.부산교육 정책연구 보고서. 2014-16 (2014)
- 우길주, "한국과 미국 초·중등학생의 읽기능력 비교분석", 언어과학, 21(4), pp.81~99 (2014), 한국언어과학회[DOI]
- 우길주, "영어 읽기 유창성과 읽기 이해력 간의 정준상관분석", 새한영어영문학, 54(4), pp.183~201 (2012), 새한영어영문학회
- 우길주, "읽기 이해력 예측 지표로서의 읽기 유창성 평가의 타당도 분석", 초등영어교육, 17(2), pp.61~82 (2011), 한국초등영어교육학회
- 우길주, "리터러시 기반 초등영어 교사 양성", 한국초등영어교육학회 소식지, 26, pp.17~20 (2009)
- 2009 개정 교육과정에 따른 초․중학교 영어과 핵심 성취기준 개발 연구, "임찬빈", 11~39 (2013)
- 정은숙, "읽기 기초단계에서의 음소 인식 지도가 초등 영어 읽기 능력 및 정의적 영역에 미치는 효과", 석사, 초등영어교육, pp.2007
- Catts, H., "Sub-grouping Poor Readers on the Basis of Individual Differences in Reading-related Abilities", Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36, pp.151~165 (2003)
- Cho, K., "Teachers’ Voices in EFL Teachers Training: Reactions to a Sustained Silent Reading Experience", The International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, pp.17~20 (2004)
- Foorman, B., "Critical Elements of Classroom and Small-group Instruction Promote Reading Success in All Children. Learning", Disabilities Research & Practice, 16(4), pp.202~211 (2001)
- Krashen, S., "Explorations in Language Acquisition and Use" (2003), Heinemann Publishing Company
- Developing Early Literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel, "National Early Literacy Panel", National Institute for Literacy, ~ (2008)
- Good, R., "DIBELS Next Assessment Manual", Dynamic Measurement Group, Inc, ~ (2010)
- Snow, C., "Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children" (1998), National Academy Press
- Stanovichi, K, "Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in Acquisition of Literacy", Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), pp.360~406 (1996)