본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Grammaticalization of the Plural Marker in Korean: From Object to Text to Stance

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This paper addresses the Korean plural suffix -tul which started out as a noun with the meaning of ‘others (of a similar kind)’ or ‘these (just listed)’ and grammaticalized into a bound plural suffix. One peculiarity in Present-Day Korean is that it became reanalyzed as a formant whose function is not merely a pluralizer but also a discourse marker signaling the speaker's attitudes. Its development presents a number of intriguing aspects of grammaticalization. It shows not only the traditional [lexical > grammatical] change but also [grammatical > discourse] change. It also exhibits ‘persistence’ in that its presence usually implies plurality of the sentential subject. Further, it strongly suggests that language users often use intercategorial analogy in grammaticalization, a point argued for in recent literature. This paper shows the intercategorial fluidity that lingers around the grammaticalizing form and intersubjectification that constantly pushes a form into the interpersonal domain

Abstract

This paper addresses the Korean plural suffix -tul which started out as a noun with the meaning of ‘others (of a similar kind)’ or ‘these (just listed)’ and grammaticalized into a bound plural suffix. One peculiarity in Present-Day Korean is that it became reanalyzed as a formant whose function is not merely a pluralizer but also a discourse marker signaling the speaker's attitudes. Its development presents a number of intriguing aspects of grammaticalization. It shows not only the traditional [lexical > grammatical] change but also [grammatical > discourse] change. It also exhibits ‘persistence’ in that its presence usually implies plurality of the sentential subject. Further, it strongly suggests that language users often use intercategorial analogy in grammaticalization, a point argued for in recent literature. This paper shows the intercategorial fluidity that lingers around the grammaticalizing form and intersubjectification that constantly pushes a form into the interpersonal domain

참고문헌 (66)

  1. Ahn, K. D., "A Usage-based Approach to Complex Preposition in English: With Special Reference to Analogy-Driven Grammaticalization", Ph.D., pp.2015
  2. 안미경, "Grammaticalization through Analogy:A Case of Some Complex Prepositions", 언어와언어학, (40), pp.47~63 (2007), 언어연구소
  3. 안미경, "English causal complex prepositions : a grammaticalization perspective", 박사, 영어학, pp.2009
  4. 백정혜, "Grammaticalization of English spatial prepositions and its educational implications", 박사, 영어영문학, pp.2006
  5. Bopp, F., "Über das Conjugationassystem der Sanskritsprache in Vergleichung mit Jenem der Griechischen, Lateinischen, Persischen und Germanischen Sprachen" (1816), Andreäische
  6. Brown, P., "Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage" (1987), Cambridge University Press
  7. Chae, H. R., "The Morphosyntactic Status and Distribution of the Korean Plural Marker -tul", Paper presented at the 20th International Congress of Linguists (2018), Cape Town International Convention Center
  8. Choe, H. B., (1961), Jungeumsa
  9. "2001", 48
  10. Coussé, E., "Category Change from a Constructional Perspective", pp.93~118 (2018), Benjamins
  11. Craig, C., "Approaches to Grammaticalization. 2 vols", pp.455~492 (1991), John Benjamins
  12. Dalrymple, M., "Plural Semantics, Reduplication, and Numeral Modification in Indonesian", Journal of Semantics, 29(2), pp.229~260 (2012)[DOI]
  13. Degand, L., "On Identifying Basic Discourse Units in Speech: Theoretical and Empirical Issues", Discours, 4, pp.1~19 (2009)[DOI]
  14. Degand, L., "Form and Function of the Left Periphery in a Multigenre Spoken Corpus", Paper presented at the 12th Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language (CSDL) Conference (2014), University of California
  15. Dehé, N., "The Syntax, Pragmatics, and Prosody of Parenthetical what", English Language and Linguistics, 10(2), pp.289~320 (2006)[DOI]
  16. Fischer, O., "The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization", pp.31~42 (2011), Oxford University Press
  17. Genetti, C., "Approaches to Grammaticalization, 2 vols", pp.227~255 (1991), John Benjamins
  18. Harris, T., "The Transition of the Suffix -ish from a Bound Morpheme to the Discourse Marker Ish in English", Paper presented at the 47th Poznan Linguistic Meeting (PLM-47) (2017)
  19. Haspelmath, M., "The World Atlas of Language Structures Online" (2013), Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
  20. Heine, B., "On Discourse Markers: Grammaticalization, Pragmaticalization, or Something Else?", Linguistics, 51(6), pp.1205~1247 (2013)[DOI]
  21. Heine, B., "World Lexicon of Grammaticalization" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  22. Himmelmann, N. P., "What Makes Grammaticalization: A Look from its Components and its Fringes", pp.21~42 (2004), Mouton de Gruyter
  23. Hopper, P. J., "Approaches to Grammaticalization. 2 vols", pp.17~35 (1991), Benjamins
  24. Hopper, P. J., "Grammaticalization" (2003), Cambridge University Press
  25. Horn Tooke, J., "Epea Pteroenta or the Diversions of Purley. 2 vols" (1857), Johnson
  26. Jeong, H. S., "From Suffix to Discourse Marker: Functions of Free Morpheme ish and its Course of Development", Ph.D., pp.2018
  27. Kang, B. M., "Plurality and Other Semantic Aspects of Common Nouns in Korean", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 3(1), pp.1~24 (1994)
  28. Kim, J. H., "A Study on Pocosa in Middle Korean", MA, pp.1995
  29. 김소영, "The Corpus Investigation of Korean Plural Marker –tul constrained by Animacy", 인문사회과학연구, 18(4), pp.225~246 (2017), 인문사회과학연구소[DOI]
  30. Kim, S. H., "Grammar as an Emergent Response to Interactional Needs: A Study of Final kuntey ‘but’ in Korean Conversation", Journal of Pragmatics, 83, pp.73~90 (2015)[DOI]
  31. 구현정, "“아니, 안 하는 게 아니잖아”: 부정 표현의 문법화", 담화와 인지, 15(3), pp.1~27 (2008), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
  32. 구현정, "‘-기는’ 구문의 문법화", 담화와 인지, 19(3), pp.1~28 (2012), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
  33. Koo, H. J., "“I will do it... but I’m asking you to do it.”: On the Emergence of Polite Imperative from Promissive", Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 97, pp.487~494 (2013)
  34. Kuh, H. K., "Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics 2", pp.239~250 (1987), Hanshin
  35. Kuteva, T., "On Sentence-final "what" in Singlish: Are you the Queen of England, or what?", Journal of Language Contact, 11, pp.32~70 (2018)[DOI]
  36. Kuzmack, S., "Ish: A New Case of Antigrammaticalization?", Paper presented at the 2007 Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America (2007)
  37. Kwak, E. J., "The Event-Dependency of Noun Phrase", Ph.D., pp.1996
  38. 곽은주, "Interpretations of Plural Noun Phrases in Korean", 언어학, (35), pp.3~39 (2003), 사단법인 한국언어학회
  39. Lee, H. G., "Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics 4", pp.513~528 (1991), Hanshin
  40. Lee, H. H., (1994), Sinkoo Mwunhwasa
  41. Lehmann, C., "Approaches to Grammaticalization. 2 vols", pp.493~535 (1991), John Benjamins
  42. Lehmann, C., "Thoughts on Grammaticalization" (2015), Language Science Press
  43. Lipski, J. M., "Free at last: From Bound Morpheme to Discourse Marker in Lengua ri Palenge (Palenquero Creole Spanish)", Anthropological Linguistics, 54(2), pp.101~132 (2012)[DOI]
  44. Maschler, Y., "The Role of Prosody in the Grammaticization of Hebrew naxon (‘right", true’): Synchronic and Diachronic Aspects, 2016, pp.92, 43~73
  45. Morris, L., "A toughish problem: The Meaning of -ish", LACUS Forum, 24, pp.207~215 (1998)
  46. Nakanishi, K., "Japanese Plurals Are Exceptional", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 13(2), pp.113~140 (2004)
  47. Norde, M., "Degrammaticalization" (2009), Oxford University Press
  48. "Oxford English Dictionary, The" (2003), Oxford University Press
  49. Seongha Rhee, "What Is It For If It's Before Me?: Subjectification and Grammaticalization of English For and Before", 영미어문학, (84), pp.209~231 (2007), 한국영미어문학회
  50. Rhee, S., "Context-Induced Reinterpretation and (Inter)subjectification: The Case of Grammaticalization of Sentence-Final Particles", Language Sciences, 34(3), pp.284~300 (2012)[DOI]
  51. 이성하, "Analogy­-driven grammaticalization: A case of grammaticalization of sentence­-final markers from concomitance-­connectives", 언어연구, 31(3), pp.591~614 (2014), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  52. Rhee, S., "From Quoting to Reporting to Stance-Marking: Rhetorical Strategies and Intersubjectification of Reportative", Language Sciences, 55, pp.36~54 (2016)[DOI]
  53. Rhee, S., "Analogy-Driven Inter-Categorial Grammaticalization and (Inter)subjectification of -na in Korean", Lingua, 166, pp.22~42 (2015)[DOI]
  54. 서근화, "‘들’의 분포와 의미 기능에 대한 통시적 고찰", 국어사연구, (26), pp.219~247 (2018), 국어사학회[DOI]
  55. 송인성, "담화표지 ‘뭐’의 기능과 운율적 특성", 한국어학, 58, pp.83~106 (2013), 한국어학회
  56. Song, I. S., "Functions and Prosodic Features of Korean Discourse Markers", Ph.D., pp.2015
  57. 송인성, "담화표지 {좀}의 기능과 형태·운율적 특성의 실현 양상", 한국어학, 62, pp.315~339 (2014), 한국어학회
  58. Song, J. J., "The So-Called Plural Copy in Korean as a Marker of Distribution and Focus", Journal of Pragmatics, 27, pp.203~224 (1997)
  59. Song, S. C., "Rare Plural Marking and Ubiquitous Plural Marker in Korean", Language Research, 11(1), pp.77~86 (1975)
  60. Sun, C., "Chinese: A Linguistic Introduction" (2006), Cambridge University Press
  61. Traugott, E. C., "Meaning-Change in the Development of Grammatical Markers", Language Sciences, 2, pp.44~61 (1980)
  62. Traugott, E. C., "Motives for Language Change", pp.124~139 (2003), Cambridge University Press
  63. Traugott, E. C., "Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization", pp.29~71 (2010), Mouton De Gruyter
  64. Traugott, E. C., "Regularity in Semantic Change" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  65. Traugott, E. C., "Approaches to Grammaticalization. 2 vols", pp.189~218 (1991), John Benjamins
  66. Zheng, D., "Guhanyuyufaxueziliaohuibian" (1964), Zhonghuashuju

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)