The Syntactic Nature of Remnants in Fragment Questions in Korean
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Considerable attention is paid to how to derive fragments that nonetheless yields a full-fledged clausal interpretation to achieve an explanation of how elided fragments are realized at syntax. The quest of answering these questions has led to exciting research that explore our understanding of how language works. The primary goal of this paper is to showⅰ) its syntactic properties of Fragmentary Questions(FQs) in Korean, highlighting the theoretical implications for contemporary theories of ellipsis. FQs in Korean are derived by the movement of a contrastive topic marked remnant to the CP, followed by clausal deletion. As well, ⅱ) Fragments in English and FQs in Korean can be explained in a unified way by exploiting Chomsky’s (2013,2015) labeling algorithm. This paper also aims to present the possibility that labels of remnants in FQs in Korean play a crucial role to be fully interpreted at Conceptual-Intentional(CI) Interface.
Abstract
Considerable attention is paid to how to derive fragments that nonetheless yields a full-fledged clausal interpretation to achieve an explanation of how elided fragments are realized at syntax. The quest of answering these questions has led to exciting research that explore our understanding of how language works. The primary goal of this paper is to showⅰ) its syntactic properties of Fragmentary Questions(FQs) in Korean, highlighting the theoretical implications for contemporary theories of ellipsis. FQs in Korean are derived by the movement of a contrastive topic marked remnant to the CP, followed by clausal deletion. As well, ⅱ) Fragments in English and FQs in Korean can be explained in a unified way by exploiting Chomsky’s (2013,2015) labeling algorithm. This paper also aims to present the possibility that labels of remnants in FQs in Korean play a crucial role to be fully interpreted at Conceptual-Intentional(CI) Interface.
참고문헌 (50)
- Aelbrecht, L., "You Have the Right to Remain Silent, The Syntactic Licensing of Ellipsis", 박사, Hogeschool Universiteit Brussel, 2009
- Aelbrecht, L, "The Syntactic Licensing of Ellipsis" (2010), John Benjamins Publishing
- Aelbrecht, L, "What Ellipsis can Do for Phases and What It Can’t, but Not How", The Linguistic Review, 33(4), pp.453~482 (2016)[DOI]
- Ahn, H. D, "Fragments vs. Null arguments in Korean", Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on HPSG. Chungnam National University Daejeon, pp.369~387 (2012), CSLI Publications
- Bocci, G, "Criterial Positions and Left Periphery in Italian: Evidence for the Syntactic Encoding of Contrastive Focus", Nanzan Linguistics Special Issue, 3, pp.35~70 (2007)
- Büring, D, "Information Structure: Theoretical, Typological, and Experimental Perspectives", pp.177~205 (2009)
- Chomsky, N, "Approaching UG from Below", Interfaces+ Recursion=Language, 89, pp.1~30 (2007)[DOI]
- Chomsky, N, "The Evolution of Human Language: Biolinguistic Perspectives", pp.45~62 (2010), Cambridge University Press
- Chomsky, N, "Problems of Projection", Lingua, 130, pp.33~49 (2013)[DOI]
- Chomsky, N, "Structures, Strategies and Beyond:Studies in Honour of Adriana Belletti", pp.1~16 (2015), John Benjamins
- Chomsky, N, "UCLA Lectures", lingbuzz, 2020
- "Minimalism: Where We Are Now, and Where We Are Going" (2020)[URL]
- 정대호, "Elliptical Contrastive Topic Construction and Theories of Multi-elemental Fragments", 생성문법연구, 31(1), pp.169~193 (2021), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Constant, N., "Contrastive Topic: Meanings and Realizations", 박사, pp.2014
- Craenenbroeck, J., "Ellipsis in Dutch Dialects" (2004), LOT
- Craenenbroeck, J, "Sluicing: Cross-linguistic Perspectives", pp.40~67 (2012), Oxford University Press
- Erteschik-Shir, N., "Information Structure: The Syntax-Discourse Interface" (2007), Oxford University Press
- Gergel, R., "Interpretable Features in vP-Ellipsis: On the Licensing Head", Proceedings of Console, pp.165~ (2007)
- Haegeman, L, "Negation and Polarity: Syntactic and Semantic Perspectives", pp.21~61 (2000), Oxford University Press
- Hartmann, K., "Right-Node Raising and Gapping: Interface Conditions on Prosodic Deletion" (2000), John Benjamins
- Hoji, H., "Logical Form Constraints and Configurational Structures in Japanese", 박사, pp.1985
- 전혜원, "한국어 조각의문문에 대한 소고", 인문사회과학연구, 23(2), pp.117~138 (2022), 인문사회과학연구소[DOI]
- Johnson, K, "The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory", pp.439~479 (2001), Blackwell
- Kuroda, S, "Focusing on the Matter of Topic: A Study of Wa and Ga in Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 14, pp.1~58 (2005)[DOI]
- Lochbihler, B., "Clause Typing and Feature Inheritance of Discourse Features", Syntax, 19(4), pp.354~391 (2016)[DOI]
- Lobeck, A., "Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing, and Identification" (1995), OUP
- Maeda, M., "Fragmentary Questions and the Left Periphery in Japanese", Proceedings of 2nd FLC & NGC Joint Conference (2019), Pukyong National University
- Maeda, M, "Fragmentary Questions in Japanese and Korean", Proceedings of GLOW-in-Asia XII & SICOGG, 21 (2019), Dongguk University
- Merchant, J., "The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis" (2001), Oxford University Press
- Merchant, J, "Fragments and Ellipsis", Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, pp.661~738 (2004)[DOI]
- Merchant, J, "The Syntax of Nonsententials: Multidisciplinary Perspectives", pp.73~91 (2006), John Benjamins
- Merchant, J., "Topics in Ellipsis", pp.132~153 (2008), Cambridge University Press
- Merchant, J., "Diagnosing Syntax", pp.537~542 (2013), Oxford University Press
- Miyagawa, S., "Why Agree? Why Move?: Unifying Agreement-Based and Discourse-Configurational Languages" (2010), MIT Press
- Morgan, J., "Issues in Linguistics: Papers in honor of Henry and Renée Kahane", pp.719~751 (1973), University of Illinois Press
- Morgan, J, "Sentence Fragments Revisited", Cls, 25, pp.228~241 (1989)
- Nishigauchi, T, "Asymmetries in Fragments", Theoretical and Applied Linguistics at Kobe Shoin, 13, pp.51~66 (2010)
- Nishigauchi, T, "Deriving Fragments", Theoretical and Applied Linguistics at Kobe Shoin, pp.81~106 (2011)
- Ott, D., "An Ellipsis Approach to Contrastive Left-Dislocation", Linguistic Inquiry, 45(2), pp.269~303 (2014)[DOI]
- Park, B. S., "Island-Insensitive Fragment Answers in Korean", Proceedings of the 24th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 24, pp.317~325 (2005), Cascadilla
- Rizzi, L., "Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax", pp.281~337 (1997), Kluwer
- Reinhart, T, "The Chomskyan Turn", pp.360~384 (1991), Blackwell
- Rooth, M, "Ellipsis Redundancy and Reduction Redundancy", Proceedings of the Stuttgart Ellipsis Workshop, pp.1~26 (1992), IBM Germany
- Shlonsky, U, "Extended Projection and CP Cartography", Nouveaux Cahiers de Linguistique Française, 27, pp.83~93 (2006)
- Shlonsky, U, "The Cartographic Enterprise in Syntax", Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(6), pp.417~429 (2010)[DOI]
- Tancredi, C., "Deletion, Deaccenting, and Presupposition", Ph. D., pp.1992
- Vanden Wyngaerd, G., "Antecedent-Contained Deletion as Deletion", Linguistics in the Netherlands, 16, pp.203~216 (1999)[DOI]
- Wei, T, "Fragment Question and Ellipsis in Chinese", Studies in Chinese Linguistics, 34, pp.151~198 (2013)
- Weir, A., "Fragments and Clausal Ellipsis", Ph. D., pp.2014
- Zagona, K, "A Parametric Study of English and Spanish 13" (2012), Springer Science & Business Media